Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T07:41:31.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ideal and Reality: Apprentice-Master Relationships in Seventeenth Century London

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Steven R. Smith
Steven R. Smith*
Affiliation:
Savannah State College, Savannah, Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Seventeenth century England, like the rest of western Europe in the early modern period, was a patriarchal society. It had been such for a long time and would remain so until industrialization and the concept of greater individualism began to upset traditional values. The notion of family was quite different then from what it is now: the family included all persons living in a household whether they were related or not. Thus, servants, apprentices, and live-in employees were part of the employer's family and the head of the household was its absolute master, serving as surrogate father to those not actually his children. His relationship with the younger members of the family was similar to the relationship between the absolute monarchs of the era and their subjects. Of course, not all subjects were dutiful and obedient sons or daughters of the father figure, either in the state or in the family, but the ideal was patriachalism in every social unit. This ideal was perhaps nowhere better illustrated than in the institution of apprenticeship. This essay will concentrate on the apprentices of London during the early seventeenth century and will describe both the ideal and the reality of apprentice-master relationships.

Type
Articles
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , Winter 1981 , pp. 449 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Thomas, Keith, “Age and Authority in Early Modern England,” Proceedings of the British Academy (London, 1976) 5. 62, pp. 214–215.Google Scholar

2. For a discussion of domestic literature, see Powell, Chilton Latham, English Domestic Relations, 1487–1653. A Study of Matrimony and Family Life in Theory and Practice as Revealed by the Literature, Law and History of the Period. Columbia University Studies in English and Comparative Literature, no. 61 (New York, 1917). For the history of apprenticeship, see Dunlop, Olive Jocelyn and Denman, Richard D., English Apprenticeship and Child Labour, a History (London, 1912) and Davies, Margaret Gay, The Enforcement of English Apprenticeship, a Study in Applied Mercantilism, 1563–1642 (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1956).Google Scholar

3. Dod, John, A Plain and Familiar Exposition of the Ten Commandments (London, 1604), p. 184.Google Scholar

4. Stone, Lawrence, “The Rise of the Nuclear Family in Early Modern England: The Patriarchal Stage,” in The Family in History, ed. by Rosenberg, Charles E. (Philadelphia, 1975), p. 36; Hunt, David, Parents and Children in History, The Psychology of Family Life in Early Modern France (New York, 1970), pp. 152–155. See also, Thomas, , “Age and Authority.” Google Scholar

5. Ames, William, Conscience with the Power and Cases Thereof (London, 1630), p. 161; Dod, John and Cleaver, Robert, A Godly Form of Household Government(London, 1630), sig. Aa4r-Aa4v; Abbot, Robert, A Christian Family Builded by God, Directing all Governors of Families How to Act (London, 1635), p. 60; Bunyan, John, Christian Behavior; Being the Fruits of True Christianity in The Complete Works of John Bunyan ed. by Stebbling, Henry (reprint, New York, 1970), v. 2 p. 173.Google Scholar

6. Schochet, Gordon J., “Patriarchalism, Politics, and Mass Attitudes in Stuart England,” Historical Journal, v. 12 (September, 1969): 413–441. Quote is from Dod, and Cleaver, , Household Government, p. 1.Google Scholar

7. Hilder, Thomas, Conjugal Counsel, or Seasonable Advice both to Married and Unmarried Persons (London, 1653), p. 164; Ames, , Conscience, pp. 159–160; Herbert, George, A Priest to the Temple (London, 1671), p. 36; Bunyan, , Christian Behavior, p. 177.Google Scholar

8. Kirkman, Francis, The Unlucky Citizen Experimentally Described in the Various Misfortunes of an Unlucky Londoner (London, 1673), pp. 146–148.Google Scholar

9. Newcome, Henry, The Autobiography of Henry Newcome, Chetham Society, Remains (Manchester, 1852), vols. 26–27 pp. 172–178, pp. 181–184.Google Scholar

10. Smith, Steven R. “Religion and the Conception of Youth in Seventeenth Century England,” History of Childhood Quarterly, vol. 2 (4) (Spring, 1975): 493–516.Google Scholar

11. Norwood, Richard, The Journal of Richard Norwood, Surveyor of Bermuda (New York, 1945), p. 16; Disney, Gervase, Some Remarkable Passages in the Holy Life and Death of Gervase Disney (London, 1692). pp. 36–48.Google Scholar

12. Kirkman, and Head, Richard, The English Rogue Described in the Life of Meriton Latroon (London, new ed., 1935).Google Scholar

13. The title of the play refers to the eastern end of London in contrast to the western part where business was concentrated. See Harris, Julia Hamlet, Eastward Ho by Chapman, Jonson, and Martson , Yale Studies in English, v. 73 (New Haven, Connecticut, 1926).Google Scholar

14. Mackay, Charles, ed., A Collection of Songs and Ballads Relative to the London Prentices and Trades, The Percy Society Publications, Vol. I (London, 1841), pp. 51–53. The Roxburgh Ballads, Publications of the Ballad Society (London, 1845), v. 3, part 1, 38–41, 23–28, 1–3.Google Scholar

15. Mackay, , Ballads, pp. 35–50.Google Scholar

16. Green, Robert, A Notable Discovery of Cousnage (London, 1591). The Second and Last Part of Conny-Catching (London, 1593). Thieves Falling Out; True Men Come By Their Goods (1637 ed. of A Disputation Between A He Conny Catcher and a She Conny Catcher).Google Scholar

17. Pepys, Samuel, The Diary of Samuel Pepys, M.A., F.R.S., ed. by Wheatley, Henry B. (London, 1876), v. 7, 373–3.Google Scholar

18. For a description of Shrove Tuesday customs, see Brand, John, Observations of the Popular Antiquities of Great Britain, revised by Ellis, Henry Sir (London, 1902), v. 1 63–94. See also Thompson, F. P., “‘Rough Music,’ Le Charivari anglais,” Annales, (March–April, 1972) v. 27, pp. 285–312. Youthful rebelliousness was also institutionalized in rituals in early modern schools; see Thomas, Keith, Rule and Misrule in the Schools of Early Modern England. The Stenton Lecture (Reading, 1975).Google Scholar

19. Smith, , “Almost Revolutionaries: the London Apprentices During the Civil Wars,” Huntington Library Quarterly, v. 42 4 (Autumn, 1979), pp. 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20. Clark, Arthur Melville, Thomas Heywood, Playwright and Miscellanist (Oxford, 1931), pp. 47, 93–95; Beaumont, Francis and Fletcher, John, The Knight of the Burning Pestle by Beaumont and Fletcher, ed. by Murch, Herbert S., Yale Studies in English, v. 33 (New York, 1908), xiv–xviii, lix, lxxxii–lxxxvi; Deloney, Thomas, The Novels of Thomas Deloney , ed. by Lawlis, Merritt E. (Bloomington, Indiana, 1961) pp. 115–139; Rowley, William, A Shoemaker, a Gentleman , ed. by Wharton, Charles, Publications of the University of Pennsylvania Series in Philology and Literature, vol. 13 (Philadelphia, 1910).Google Scholar

21. J.S., London's Glory; or the History of the Famous and Valiant London Prentices (London, ca. 1700). A slightly different version is told in a ballad; see Mackay, , Ballads , pp. 22–28.Google Scholar

22. The Honour of London Prentices Exemplified in a Brief Historical Narration (London, 1647).Google Scholar

23. Middlesex Sessions of the Peace (Middlesex Record Office): Session Books 70/19, 32, 126/34; 137/30; 148/41; 126/34, 43; 70/32; 148/50.Google Scholar

24. Schochet, , “Patriachalism,” pp. 421–422. Goody, Jack and Watt, Ian, “The Consequences of Literacy,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5 (April, 1963): 325–326.Google Scholar

25. Smith, , “The London Apprentices as Seventeenth-Century Adolescents,” Past & Present, no. 61 (November, 1973): 149–161; Fox, Vivian C., “Is Adolescence a Phenomenon of Modern Times?” Journal of Psychohistory, V. 2, (Fall, 1972): 271–290.Google Scholar