Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Hostname: page-component-54cdcc668b-mmx8t Total loading time: 0.192 Render date: 2021-03-08T22:37:15.729Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }
EnglishFrançais
Hypatia Hypatia

Article contents

Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

María Lugones
Corresponding
E-mail address:
marialugones@hotmail.com
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The coloniality of power is understood by Anibal Quijano as at the constituting crux of the global capitalist system of power. What is characteristic of global, Eurocentered, capitalist power is that it is organized around two axes that Quijano terms “the coloniality of power” and “modernity.” The coloniality of power introduces the basic and universal social classification of the population of the planet in terms of the idea of race, a replacing of relations of superiority and inferiority established through domination with naturalized understandings of inferiority and superiority. In this essay, Lugones introduces a systemic understanding of gender constituted by colonial/modernity in terms of multiple relations of power. This gender system has a light and a dark side that depict relations, and beings in relation as deeply different and thus as calling for very different patterns of violent abuse. Lugones argues that gender itself is a colonial introduction, a violent introduction consistently and contemporarily used to destroy peoples, cosmologies, and communities as the building ground of the “civilized” West.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 22 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Writing Against Heterosexism , Winter 2007 , pp. 186 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

Alexander, M. Jacqui, and Mohanty, Chandra, eds. 1997. Feminist genealogies, colonial legacies, democratic futures. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Allen, Paula Gunn. 1986/1992. The sacred hoop: Recovering the feminine in American Indian traditions. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Amos, Valerie, and Parmar, Pratibha. 1984. Challenging imperial feminism. In Feminism and ‘race,’ ed. Bhavnani, Kum‐Kum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands/la Frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute.Google Scholar
Brown, Elsa Barkley. 1991. Polyrhythms and Improvisations. In History Workshop 31.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1995. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In Critical race theory, ed. Crenshaw, Kimberlé, Gotanda, Neil, Peller, Gary, and Thomas, Kendall. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Espiritu, Yen Le. 1997. Race, class, and gender in Asian America. In Making more waves, ed. Kim, Elaine H., Villanueva, Lilia V., and Asian Women United of California. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Julie. A. 2002. Definitional dilemmas: Male or female? Black or white? The law's failure to recognize intersexuals and multiracials. In Gender nonconformity, race, and sexuality: Charting the connections, ed. Lester, Toni. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Horswell, Michael. Toward an Andean theory of ritual same‐sex sexuality and third‐gender subjectivity. In Infamous desire: Male homosexuality in colonial Latin America, ed. Sigal, Pete. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1984. The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house. In Sister outsider. Trumansburg, N.Y.: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2005. Radical multiculturalism and women of color feminisms. Revista Internarional de Filosofia Poltica.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2003. Pilgrimages/peregrinajes: Theorizing coalitions against multiple oppressions. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
McClintock, Anne. 1995. Imperial leather: Race, gender, and sexuality in the colonial contest. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oyewùmí, Oyéronké. 1997. The invention of women: Making an African sense of Western gender discourses. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Quijano, Anibal. 1991. Colonialidad, modernidad/racionalidad. Peru Indigena 13 (29): 11–29.Google Scholar
Quijano, Anibal. 2000a. Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y America Latina. In Colonialidad del saber, eurocentrismo y ciencias sicales. CLACSO‐UNESCO 2000, Buenos Aires, Argentina .Google Scholar
Quijano, Anibal. 2000b. Colonialidad del Poder y Clasificacion Social. In Festschrift for Immanuel Wallerstein. Special issue, Journal of World Systems Research 5, no. 2 (summer/fall).Google Scholar
Quijano, Anibal. 2001/2002. Colonialidad del poder, globalización y democracia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León 4, nos. 7–8 (September 2001–April 2002): 1–23.Google Scholar
Sigal, Pete. 2003. Gendered power, the hybrid self, and homosexual desire in late colonial Yucatan. In Infamous desire: Male homosexuality in colonial Latin America, ed. Sigal, Pete. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth. 1988. Inessential woman. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Takaki, Ronald. 1993. A different mirror. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 37
Total number of PDF views: 684 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 25th March 2020 - 8th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

20 Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *