Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T05:46:23.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HISTORICAL MEMORIES OF A CHINESE ADVENTURER IN A TAY CHRONICLE; USURPATION OF THE THRONE OF A TAY POLITY IN YUNNAN, 1573–1584

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2006

Christian Daniels
Affiliation:
Tokyo University of Foreign Studies E-mail cdani@aa.tufs.ac.jp

Abstract

By analysing a Tay chronicle and Chinese sources about a case of usurpation in the Tay (Shan) polity of Mäng: Wan: located in southwest Yunnan on the border with Burma (Myanmar) in 1573, this article offers an alternative approach to the use of chronicles as sources for the history of the Tay Cultural Area. It argues that Tay chronicles are media for the creation and transmission of historical memories, and that they can be utilized to redress the excessive subjectivity of Chinese sources precisely because they show how the Tay interpreted events. Analyses of these interpretations in turn reveal the principal concepts underlying Tay political and social organization, thereby allowing historians to establish benchmarks for ascertaining the changes that took place in Tay polities. This study emphasizes that the memory of the usurpation was generated by the realities of Mäng: Wan:'s power relations with China and Burma, and demonstrates that apart from elucidating the role of royal succession, these memories also throw light on some of the larger recurring themes in the history of Tay relations with China, such as the role of Han Chinese migrants in polity building and administration and land alienation by contractual transactions.

Type
CONCEPT OF THE BORDER: NATIONS, PEOPLES AND FRONTIERS IN ASIAN HISTORY (2)
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This a revised and expanded version of Daniels 2004 published in Japanese. I am grateful to the two anonymous referees of the International Journal of Asian Studies for helpful suggestions and constructive comments in the process of revision.