Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T22:35:19.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do Women Make More Credible Threats? Gender Stereotypes, Audience Costs, and Crisis Bargaining

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2020

Get access


As more women attain executive office, it is important to understand how gender dynamics affect international politics. Toward this end, we present the first evidence that gender stereotypes affect leaders’ abilities to generate audience costs. Using survey experiments, we show that female leaders have political incentives to combat gender stereotypes that women are weak by acting “tough” during international military crises. Most prominently, we find evidence that female leaders, and male leaders facing female opponents, pay greater inconsistency costs for backing down from threats than male leaders do against fellow men. These findings point to particular advantages and disadvantages women have in international crises. Namely, female leaders are better able to tie hands—an efficient mechanism for establishing credibility in crises. However, this bargaining advantage means female leaders will also have a harder time backing down from threats. Our findings have critical implications for debates over the effects of greater gender equality in executive offices worldwide.

Research Note
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Alexander, Deborah, and Andersen, Kristi. 1993. Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits. Political Research Quarterly 46 (3):527–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., and O'Brien, Diana Z.. 2018. Defending the Realm: The Appointment of Female Defense Ministers Worldwide. American Journal of Political Science 62 (2):355–68.10.1111/ajps.12337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashevkin, Sylvia. 2018. Women as Foreign Policy Leaders: National Security and Gender Politics in Superpower America. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baturo, Alexander, and Gray, Julia. 2018. When Do Family Ties Matter? The Duration of Female Suffrage and Women's Path to High Political Office. Political Research Quarterly 71 (3):695709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2015. Who Stereotypes Female Candidates? Identifying Individual Differences in Feminine Stereotype Reliance. Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (1):94110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2017. The Effects of Counterstereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations. Political Psychology 38 (2):279–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brutger, Ryan, and Kertzer, Joshua D.. 2018. A Dispositional Theory of Reputation Costs. International Organization 72 (3):693724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Diana, and Borgida, Eugene. 1999. Who Women Are, Who Women Should Be: Descriptive and Prescriptive Gender Stereotyping in Sex Discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 5 (3):665–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprioli, Mary, and Boyer, Mark A.. 2001. Gender, Violence, and International Crisis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (4):503–18.10.1177/0022002701045004005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Ryan E., Carreras, Miguel, and Love, Gregory J.. 2019. Presidents’ Sex and Popularity: Baselines, Dynamics and Policy Performance. British Journal of Political Science: 121. doi:10.1017/S0007123418000364Google Scholar
Cialdini, Robert B., and Trost, Melanie R.. 1998. Social Influence: Social Norms, Conformity, and Compliance. In The Handbook of Social Psychology edited by Gilbert, Daniel Todd, Fiske, Sustain T., Lindzey, Gardner, 151–92. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Clayton, Amanda, O'Brien, Diana Z., and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2019. All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy. American Journal of Political Science 62 (1):113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisman-Cox, Casey, and Gibilisco, Michael. 2018. Audience Costs and the Dynamics of War and Peace. American Journal of Political Science 62 (3):566–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croco, Sarah E., and Gartner, Scott Sigmund. 2014. Flip-Flops and High Heels: An Experimental Analysis of Elite Position Change and Gender on Wartime Public Support. International Interactions 40 (1):124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dafoe, Allan, Zhang, Baobao, and Caughey, Devin. 2018. Information Equivalence in Survey Experiments. Political Analysis 26 (4):399416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. When Does Gender Matter? Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dube, Oeindrila, and Harish, S.P.. Forthcoming. Queens. Journal of Political Economy.Google Scholar
Ellemers, Naomi. 2018. Gender Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology 69 (1):275–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enloe, Cynthia. 1990. Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Falk, Erika, and Kenski, Kate. 2006. Issue Saliency and Gender Stereotypes: Support for Women as Presidents in Times of War and Terrorism. Social Science Quarterly 87 (1):118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3):577–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1995. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 49 (3):379414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1997. Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands Versus Sinking Costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1):6890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, Geraldine, and Francke, Linda Bird. 2004. My Story. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Antonia. 1990. Warrior Queens: The Legends and the Lives of the Women Who Have Led Their Nations in War. Random House.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1998. Women and the Evolution of World Politics. Foreign Affairs 77 (5):2440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, Caitlin C. 2018. Boudica: Warrior Woman of Roman Britain. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, Henk E., Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Chiozza, Giacomo. 2009. Introducing Archigos: A Dataset of Political Leaders. Journal of Peace Research 46 (2):269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. 2001. War and Gender. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth. 2013. Gendered News: Media Coverage and Electoral Politics in Canada. University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2011. When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution. Politics and Gender 7 (2):133–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, Madeline E. 1995. Sex Stereotypes and Their Effects in the Workplace: What We Know and What We Don't Know. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10 (6):326.Google Scholar
Heilman, Madeline E. 2001. Description and Prescription: How Gender Stereotypes Prevent Women's Ascent Up the Organizational Ladder. Journal of Social Issues 57 (4):657–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, Madeline E. 2012. Gender Stereotypes and Workplace Bias. Research in Organizational Behavior 32:113–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., Merolla, Jennifer, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2011. Sex, Stereotypes, and Security: A Study of the Effects of Terrorist Threat on Assessments of Female Leadership. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 32 (3):173–92.10.1080/1554477X.2011.589283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., Merolla, Jennifer L., Zechmeister, Elizabeth J., and Wang, Ding. 2019. Terrorism, Gender, and the 2016 US Presidential Election. Electoral Studies 61:18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Michael C., Stam, Allan C., and Ellis, Cali M.. 2015. Why Leaders Fight. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37 (1):119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalalzai, Farida. 2013. Shattered, Cracked, or Firmly Intact? Women and the Executive Glass Ceiling Worldwide. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1978. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics 30 (2):167214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1992. Does Being Male Help? An Investigation of the Effects of Candidate Gender and Campaign Coverage on Evaluations of US Senate Candidates. Journal of Politics 54 (2):497517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karim, Sabrina, Gilligan, Michael J., Blair, Robert, and Beardsley, Kyle. 2018. International Gender Balancing Reforms in Postconflict Countries: Lab-in-the-Field Evidence from the Liberian National Police. International Studies Quarterly 62 (3):618–31.10.1093/isq/sqy009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D., and Brutger, Ryan. 2016. Decomposing Audience Costs: Bringing the Audience Back into Audience Cost Theory. American Journal of Political Science 60 (1):234–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, Samara. 2018. When Common Identities Decrease Trust: An Experimental Study of Partisan Women. American Journal of Political Science 62 (3):610–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2000. Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates' Ideological Orientations? Journal of Politics 62 (2):414–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Michael T., and Fulton, Sarah A.. 2011. In the Defense of Women: Gender, Office Holding, and National Security Policy in Established Democracies. Journal of Politics 73 (1):116.10.1017/S0022381610000824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kromer, Mileah, and Parry, Janine A.. 2019. The Clinton Effect? The (Non)Impact of a High-Profile Candidate on Gender Stereotypes. Social Science Quarterly 100 (6):2134–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer. 2004. Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era. Political Research Quarterly 57 (3):479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S., and Horowitz, Michael C.. 2012. When Backing Down Is the Right Decision. Journal of Politics 74 (2):323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Bing. 2015. Sentiment Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNell, Lillian, Driscoll, Adam, and Hunt, Andrea N.. 2015. What's in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching. Innovative Higher Education 40 (4):291303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, Inder. 1991. Indira Gandhi: A Personal and Political Biography. Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary US Elections. American Journal of Political Science 41 (1):270–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2015. Sex and Death: Gender Differences in Aggression and Motivations for Violence. International Organization 69 (3):753–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose, Johnson, Dominic, Cowden, Jonathan, and Rosen, Stephen. 2007. Testosterone and Aggression in a Simulated Crisis Game. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614 (1):1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarty, Craig, Yzerbyt, Vincent Y., and Spears, Russell. 2002. Stereotypes as Explanations: The Formation of Meaningful Beliefs About Social Groups. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlen, Nancy E., and Sarkees, Meredith Reid. 1993. Women in Foreign Policy: The Insiders. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mummolo, Jonathan, and Petersen, Erik. 2019. Demand Effects in Survey Experiments: An Empirical Assessment. American Political Science Review 113 (2):517–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naurin, Daniel, Naurin, Elin, and Alexander, Amy. 2019. Gender Stereotyping and Chivalry in International Negotiations: A Survey Experiment in the Council of the European Union. International Organization 73 (2):469–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomikos, William G., and Sambanis, Nicholas. 2019. What Is the Mechanism Underlying Audience Costs? Incompetence, Belligerence, and Inconsistency. Journal of Peace Research 56 (4):575–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 2011. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. Penguin.Google Scholar
Post, Abigail S., and Sen, Paromita. 2020. Why Can't a Woman Be More Like a Man? Female Leaders in Crisis Bargaining. International Interactions 46 (1):127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Phillip B.K., and Baum, Matthew A.. 2010. Democratic Peace, Domestic Audience Costs, and Political Communication. Political Communication 27 (4):453–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Patrick M., and Paskeviciute, Aida. 2003. Women's Access to Politics and Peaceful States. Journal of Peace Research 40 (3):287302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, Dan. 2014. The Positivist Study of Gender and International Relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (7):1301–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., Tingley, Dustin, Lucas, Christopher, Leder-Luis, Jetson, Gadarian, Shana Kushner, Albertson, Bethany, and David G, Rand. 2014. Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses. American Journal of Political Science 58 (4):1064–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenwasser, Shirley Miller, and Dean, Norma G.. 1989. Gender Role and Political Office: Effects of Perceived Masculinity/Femininity of Candidate and Political Office. Psychology of Women Quarterly 13 (1):7785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, Jacob E., Howat, Adam J., Shafranek, Richard M., and Busby, Ethan C.. 2019. Pigeonholing Partisans: Stereotypes of Party Supporters and Partisan Polarization. Political Behavior 41 (2):423–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudman, Laurie A., and Glick, Peter. 2001. Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women. Journal of Social Issues 57 (4):743–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice. American Journal of Political Science 46 (1):2034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schramm, Madison, and Stark, Alexandra. 2020. Peacemakers or Iron Ladies? A Cross National Study of Gender and International Conflict. Security Studies. DOI: 10.1080/09636412.2020.1763450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 1998. Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises. American Political Science Review 92 (4):829–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura, and Tickner, J. Ann. 2011. Feminism and International Relations: Conversations About the Past, Present and Future. Routledge.Google Scholar
Stiehm, Judith Hicks. 1982. The Protector, the Protected, the Defender. Women's Studies International Forum 5 (3–4):367–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swim, Janet K., and Sanna, Lawrence J.. 1996. He's Skilled, She's Lucky: A Meta-Analysis of Observers’ Attributions for Women's and Men's Successes and Failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (5):507–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teele, Dawn Langan, Kalla, Joshua, and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2018. The Ties That Double Bind: Social Roles and Women's Underrepresentation in Politics. American Political Science Review 112 (3):525–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1992. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1994. Why Women Can't Run the World: International Politics According to Francis Fukuyama. International Studies Review 1 (3):311.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael. 2007. Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach. International Organization 61 (4):821–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trager, Robert F., and Vavreck, Lynn. 2011. The Political Costs of Crisis Bargaining: Presidential Rhetoric and the Role of the Party. American Journal of Political Science 55 (3):526–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Jessica L. 2008. Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve. International Organization 62 (1):3564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarhi-Milo, Keren, Joshua, D. Kertzer, and Jonathan Renshon, . 2018. Tying Hands, Sinking Costs, and Leader Attributes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 62 (10):2150–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Schwartz and Blair Dataset

Supplementary material: File

Schwartz and Blair supplementary material

Schwartz and Blair supplementary material

Download Schwartz and Blair supplementary material(File)
File 507.8 KB