Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T03:14:46.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The origins and development of the Northeast Asian political economy: industrial sectors, product cycles, and political consequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Bruce Cumings
Bruce Cumings
Affiliation:
Bruce Cumings is Associate Professor of International Studies at theUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Get access

Extract

Theories of the product cycle, hegemony, and the world system are used to analyze the creation and development of the Northeast Asian political economy in this century. Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan have each developed in a particular relationship with the others; the three taken together form a hierarchical, constantly interacting political-economic unit. During the period of colonial rule Japan was unique in building an imperial economic unit marked by a strong role for the state (whether in Tokyo or Taipei), by a tight, integral Unking of all three nations into a communications and transport network running toward the metropole, and by a strategy of both using the colonies for agricultural surpluses and then locating industries there. After 1945 a diffuse American hegemony replaced Japan's unilateral system, but elements of the prewar model have survived: strong states direct economic development in South Korea and Taiwan (here termed “bureaucratic-authoritarian industrializing regimes”); both countries are receptacles for Japan's declining industries; and both countries develop in tandem, if in competition, with each other. The most recent export-led competition has seen Taiwan succeed where South Korea has (temporarily?) failed, leaving Seoul in an export-led “trap,” burdened with rapidly increasing external debt. Taiwan, furthermore, has industrialized relatively free of social disruption, whereas Korean society resisted its transformation at Japanese hands and remains more rebellious today. There can be one Japan and one Taiwan, but not two or many of either, in the world economy.

Information

Type
Political Consequences of Industrial Change
Information
International Organization , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , Winter 1984 , pp. 1 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Handbook of Economic Statistics 1979 (Washington, D.C.: National Foreign Assessment Center, 1980).Google Scholar

2. Allen, G. C., Japan's Economic Policy (London: Macmillan, 1980), p. 1Google Scholar; see also Ohkawa, Kazushi and Rosovsky, Henry, Japanese Economic Growth: Trend Acceleration in the Twentieth Century (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1973), pp. 74, 82–83.Google Scholar For the comparisons of growth rates with Korea and Taiwan see Umemura, Mataji and Mizoguchi, Toshiyoki, eds., Quantitative Studies on Economic History of Japan Empire [sic], 1890–1940 (Tokyo: Hitotsubashi University, 1981), p. 64.Google Scholar

3. Kojima, Kiyoshi, Japan and a New World Economic Order (Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1977), pp. 150–51.Google Scholar

4. Wade, L. L. and Kim, B. S., Economic Development of South Korea: The Political Economy of Success (New York: Praeger, 1978), p. VI.Google Scholar

5. See Susan Greenhalgh, “Dependency, Distribution and the Taiwan ‘Paradox,’ ” and Simon, Denis, “U.S. Assistance, Land Reform, and Taiwan's Political Economy” (both papers presented at the Taiwan Political Economy Workshop,Columbia University, New York,18–20 December 1980).Google Scholar

6. For a good example of this line of reasoning see chap. 2 in Mason, Edward S. et al. , The Economic and Social Modernization of the Republic of Korea (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. For references, see Calleo, David P. and Rowland, Benjamin M., America and the World Political Economy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1973)Google Scholar, and Viner, Jacob, “Power versus Plenty as Objectives of Foreign Policy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries,” World Politics 1 (10 1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, on mercantilism and neomercantilism; Vernon, Raymond, Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprises (New York: Basic Books, 1971)Google Scholar, on the product cycle and free trade; Wallerstein, Immanuel, “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis,” in Wallerstein, , ed., The Capitalist World-Economy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979),Google Scholar for the world system approach.

8. Kindleberger, Charles P., “Group Behavior and International Trade,” Journal of Political Economy, 02 1951, p. 42.Google Scholar

9. Wallerstein, “Rise and Future Demise.”

10. Like most interesting concepts, these categories of core, semiperiphery, and periphery have problems of definition and scope, but they are useful for locating nations in the world economy. A similar set of categories is Krasner's tripartite distinction between makers, breakers, and takers among nations. See Krasner, Stephen D., “US Commercial and Monetary Policy: Unravelling the Paradox of External Strength and Internal Weakness,” in Katzenstein, Peter J., ed., Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978), pp. 51–52.Google Scholar

11. See Bergsten, C. Fred, Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S. Jr., “International Economics and International Politics: A Framework for Analysis,” in Bergsten, and Krause, Lawrence B., eds., World Politics and International Economics (Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1975), p. 14Google Scholar; also Keohane, and Nye, , Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little, Brown, 1977), pp. 42–46.Google Scholar

12. The “grand area” was a concept used in Council on Foreign Relations planning in the early 1940s for the postwar period. See Shoup, Laurence H. and Minter, William, Imperial Brain Trust: The Council on Foreign Relations and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1977), pp. 135–40.Google Scholar

13. Hirschman, Albert O., National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade (1945; rpt. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980), pp. ix–x;Google Scholar Burke is quoted in Hirschman.

14. Kindleberger, , “Group Behavior,” pp. 43–44, 46.Google Scholar The locus classicus for such reasoning is now Kurth, James R., “The Political Consequences of the Product Cycle: Industrial History and Political Outcomes,” International Organization 33 (Winter 1979), pp. 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Krasner, , “US Commercial and Monetary Policy,” p. 60Google Scholar; Gerschenkron, Alexander, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962)Google Scholar

16. Poulantzas, Nicos, Political Power and Social Classes (London: NLB, 1975), part 4.Google Scholar

17. Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation (New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1944).Google Scholar

18. See Cumings, Bruce, The Origins of the Korean War: Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981),Google Scholar chap. 1. On Taiwan see Ho, Samuel, The Economic Development of Taiwan 1860–1970 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978), pp. 26, 32;Google Scholar he puts a similar emphasis on the role of the colonial state in Taiwan.

19. Lehmann, Jean-Pierre, The Image of Japan: From Feudal Isolation to World Power, 1850–1905 (London: Allen & Unwin, 1978), p. 178;Google ScholarWinter, M., “The Webbs and the Non-White World: A Case of Socialist Racialism,” Journal of Contemporary History 9 (01 1974), pp. 181–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20. Umemura, and Mizoguchi, , Quantitative Studies, pp. 70–77.Google Scholar

21. Landes, David S., “Japan and Europe: Contrasts in Industrialization,” in Lockwood, William W., ed., The State and Economic Enterprise in Japan (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965), p. 182.Google Scholar

22. Cumings, Origins, chaps. 1 and 2; Ho, , Economic Development, pp. 28–57;Google Scholar also Lin, Ching-yuan, Industrialization in Taiwan, 1946–1972: Trade and Import-Substitute Policies for Developing Countries (New York: Praeger, 1973), pp. 13–28.Google Scholar

23. Palais, James B., Politics and Policy in Traditional Korea (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24. Ho, , Economic Development, pp. 43, 57.Google Scholar

25. Cumings, Origins, chaps. 8–10.

26. Stein, Guenther, Made in Japan (London: Methuen, 1935), pp. 181, 191.Google Scholar

27. Ohkawa, and Rosovsky, , Japanese Economic Growth, pp. 180–83, 197.Google Scholar

28. Ho, , Economic Development, pp. 70–90;Google ScholarLin, , Industrialization in Taiwan, pp. 19–22.Google Scholar

29. Mason, et al. , Economic and Social Modernization, pp. 76, 78.Google Scholar

30. Lin, , Industrialization in Taiwan, p. 19.Google Scholar

31. Cumings, Bruce, “Corporatism in North Korea,” Journal of Korean Studies 4 (1983).Google Scholar

32. Cumings, Origins, chaps. 1 and 2.

33. Pempel, T. J., “Japanese Foreign Economic Policy: The Domestic Bases for International Behavior,” in Katzenstein, Between Power and Plenty, pp. 139–90.Google Scholar

34. Johnson, Chalmers, “A Japanese Model?” (Paper presented at the Japan Seminar, University of Washington, School of International Studies, Seattle, 05 1981)Google Scholar; also Johnson, , MITI and the Japanese Miracle (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1982), pp. 305–24.Google Scholar

35. Allen, , Japan's Economic Policy, pp. 42–50, 119–20.Google Scholar

36. Ohkawa, and Rosovsky, , Japanese Economic Growth, pp. 221–23.Google Scholar

37. Allen, , Japan's Economic Policy, pp. 50, 102, 128.Google Scholar

38. Ibid., pp. 51–54.

39. Emmerson, John, The Japanese Thread (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1978), p. 256.Google Scholar I am indebted to Michael Schaller for providing me with this quotation.

40. Halliday, Jon, A Political History of Japanese Capitalism(New York: Pantheon, 1975), pp. 183–84.Google Scholar

41. Iriye, Akira, “Continuities in U.S.-Japanese Relations, 1941–1949,” in Nagai, Yonosuke and Iriye, , eds., The Origins of the Cold War in Asia (Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 1977), pp. 378–407.Google Scholar

42. Viner, , “Power versus Plenty,” p. 91.Google Scholar

43. Roberts, John G., “The ‘Japan Crowd’ and the Zaibatsu Restoration,” Japan Interpretor 12 (Summer 1979), pp. 384–415.Google Scholar

44. Maier, Charles S., “The Politics of Productivity: Foundations of American International Economic Policy after World War II,” in Katzenstein, Between Power and Plenty, p. 45.Google Scholar

45. Halliday, , Political History, p. 183.Google Scholar

46. See Kennan's, remarks in “Transcript of Roundtable Discussion,” U.S. Department of State, 6, 7, and 8 10 1949, pp. 25, 47,Google Scholar in Carrollton Press Declassified Documents Series, 1977, 316B.

47. U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, ORE 43–48, 24 May 1948, in HST/PSF file, Memos 1945–49, box 255, Harry S. Truman Library, Independence, Missouri.

48. Economic Cooperation Administration, unsigned memorandum of 3 November 1948, in Dean Acheson Papers, box 27, Harry S. Truman Library.

49. Central Intelligence Agency, ORE 69–49, “Relative US Security Interest in the European-Mediterranean Area and the Far East,” 14 July 1949, in HST/PSF file, Memos 1945–49, box 249, Harry S. Truman Library.

50. Calleo, and Rowland, , America and the World Political Economy, pp. 198–202.Google Scholar

51. Draft paper, NSC 48, 26 October 1949, in NSC materials, box 207, Harry S. Truman Library. For a fuller elaboration see Cumings, Bruce, “Introduction: The Course of American Policy toward Korea, 1945–53,” in Cumings, , ed., Child of Conflict: The Korean-American Relationship, 1945–1953 (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1983)Google Scholar.

52. Krasner, , “US Commercial and Monetary Policy,” pp. 63–66Google Scholar; Hirschman, National Power, passim.

53. Halliday, Jon, “Japan's Changing Position in the Global Political Economy” (Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Asian Studies, 1979, Los Angeles).Google Scholar

54. See ibid.; also Caldwell, Martha, “Petroleum Politics in Japan: State and Industry in a Changing Policy Context” (Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin, 1980),Google Scholar chap. 2.

55. Vogel, Ezra F., “Growing Japanese Economic Capabilities and the U.S.-Japan Relationship” (Summary of the 1st meeting of the American Discussion Group on U.S. Policy toward Japan, Harvard University, 13 12 1979;Google Scholar hereafter cited as Harvard Seminar 1979).

56. Johnson, , “A Japan Model?” Also Allen, Japan's Economic Policy, pp. 108–9.Google Scholar

57. Pempel, , “Japanese Foreign Economic Policy,” pp. 163–64;Google ScholarHalliday, , “Japan's Changing Position”; Halliday, Political History, p. 283.Google Scholar

58. Ohkawa, and Rosovsky, , Japanese Economic Growth, pp. 118,235–36Google Scholar; Pempel, , “Japanese Foreign Economic Policy,” pp. 149–55.Google Scholar

59. Ho, , Economic Development, p. 103Google Scholar; Lin, , Taiwan's Industrialization, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar

60. Ho, , Economic Development, p. 104.Google Scholar

61. CIA, , Handbook 1979, also Ho, Economic Development, pp. 108–11;Google Scholar also Mason, et al. , Economic and Social Modernization, p. 165.Google Scholar

62. CIA, Handbook 1979.

63. Allen, , Japan's Economic Policy, p. 130.Google Scholar

64. Ho, , Economic Development, p. 237.Google Scholar

65. Immanuel Wallerstein, “Dependence in an Interdependent World,” in Wallerstein, Capitalist World-Economy.

66. Ohkawa, and Rosovsky, , Japanese Economic Development, p. 92.Google Scholar

67. On Korea, see Mason, et al. , Economic and Social Modernization, pp. 7–8;Google Scholar also Kuznets, Paul W., Economic Growth and Structure in the Republic of Korea (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977), pp. 48–71Google Scholar; on Taiwan see Lin, , Taiwan's Industrialization, pp. 3–4Google Scholar, and Ho, , Economic Development, p. 106.Google Scholar

68. Amsden, Alice H., “Taiwan's Economic History: A Case of Etatisme and a Challenge to Dependency Theory,” Modern China 5 (07 1979), p. 362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

69. Simpson, Paul B., “Report on the University of Oregon Advisory Mission,” mimeo. (Eugene: University of Oregon, 1961), p. 49.Google Scholar I am indebted to Tony Michel for bringing this quotation to my attention.

70. O'Donnell, Guillermo A., Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism in South American Politics (Berkeley: University of California Institute for International Studies, 1973)Google Scholar; see also the articles by O'Donnell, FernandoCardoso, Henrique, Kaufman, Robert, Kurth, James, Hirschman, Albert, and Serra, Jose in Collier, David, ed., The New Authoritarianism in Latin America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar Serra, Hirschman, and, in part, Kaufman challenge the O'Donnell theses.

71. Mason, et al. , Economic and Social Modernization, p. 47Google Scholar; Little, Ian M. D., “An Economic Renaissance,” in Galenson, Walter, ed., Economic Growth and Structural Change in Taiwan (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1979), p. 474.Google Scholar See also Ho, , Economic Development, p. 195.Google Scholar

72. Mason, et al. , Economic and Social Modernization, pp. 96, 129–32Google Scholar; Kuznets, , Economic Growth, pp. 73, 96–97Google Scholar; Lin, , Taiwan's Industrialization, pp. 83–93.Google Scholar

73. Kuznets, , Economic Growth, p. 103Google Scholar; Wade, and Kim, , Economic Development, p. 100Google Scholar; Chul, Suh Sang, “Development of a New Industry through Exports: The Electronics Industry in Korea,” in Hong, Wontack and Krueger, Anne O., eds., Trade and Development in Korea (Seoul: Korea Development Institute, 1975)Google Scholar.

74. Lin, , Taiwan's Industrialization, p. 134.Google Scholar

75. Huntington, Samuel, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968), pp. 7, 25, 258–61.Google Scholar

76. Mason, et al. , Economic and Social Modernization, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar

77. Kuznets, , Economic Growth, p. 85; see also pp. 105–7.Google Scholar

78. Mason, et al. , Economic and Social Modernization, pp. 16, 263, 485.Google Scholar

79. Ibid., p. 277.

80. Ibid., pp. 19, 486.

81. Ho, , Economic Development, p. 251.Google Scholar

82. Mason, et al. , Economic and Social Modernization, p. 22.Google Scholar

83. Lin, , Taiwan's Industrialization, pp. 139–44Google Scholar; Choe Boum Jong, “An Economic Study of the Masan Free Trade Zone,” in Hong and Krueger, Trade and Development.

84. Kuznets, , Economic Growth, p. 67Google Scholar; Mason, et al. , Economic and Social Modernization, p. 99Google Scholar; Greenhalgh, , “Dependency, Distribution”; seminar paper by Michel, Anthony, University of Washington, Seattle, 5 05 1983.Google Scholar

85. Kuznets, , Economic Growth, p. 152Google Scholar; Lin, , Taiwan's Industrialization, p. 137.Google Scholar

86. Chirot, Daniel, Social Change in the Twentieth Century (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977), pp. 218–20.Google Scholar

87. Cole, David C. and Lyman, Princeton N., Korean Development: The Interplay of Politics and Economics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar; also Kuznets, , Economic Growth, p. 71.Google Scholar

88. Greenhalgh, “Dependency, Distribution.”

89. Lin, , Taiwan's Industrialization, pp. 131–32.Google Scholar

90. Wade, and Kim, , Economic Development, p. 10Google Scholar; Kuznets, , Economic Growth, p. 103.Google Scholar

91. Hirschman, , National Power, pp. 34–35.Google Scholar

92. Ibid., p. 30.

93. Mason, et al. , Economic and Social Modernization, pp. 138, 497Google Scholar; Kuznets, , Economic Growth, p. 73.Google Scholar

94. Kuznets, , Economic Growth, p. 85.Google Scholar

95. Lin, , Taiwan's Industrialization, p. 173.Google Scholar

96. Vogel, , Harvard Seminar 1979.Google Scholar

97. Lin, , Taiwan's Industrialization, p. 134.Google Scholar

98. A good summary of the recent economic problems of the ROK's export-led program can be found in Park, Yung Chul, “Recent Economic Developments in Korea” (Paper presented to the Columbia University Seminar on Korea, 24 04 1981).Google Scholar

99. See “South Korea's New Leaden Off and Running,” Far Eastern Economic Review, 30 01-5 02 1981Google Scholar; Christian Science Monitor, 5 01 1982Google Scholar; Tonga Ilbo (East Asia Daily), 26 12 1981.Google Scholar

100. World Bank, Korea: A World Bank Country Economic Report, Hasan, Parvez and Rao, D. C., co-ordinators (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univesity Press, 1979), pp. 8–9, 47.Google Scholar This is also a good source on World Bank criticism of Korea's deepening industrialization strategy during the Third Five Year Plan.

101. Lecture by Thorpe, Norman, Seoul correspondent for the Asian Wall Street Journal, Seattle, Wash., 8 01 1982Google Scholar; also Marcom, John Jr, “Korea Dents Japanese Dominance in Steel,” Asian Wall Street Journal, 28 12 1981.Google Scholar

102. Raymond Vernon, in Harvard Seminar 1979, Halliday, Jon, “The Struggle for East Asia,” New Left Review no. 124 (12 1980), pp. 3–24.Google Scholar

103. Vogel in Harvard Seminar 1979.

104. Vernon in ibid.