Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5959bf8d4d-4p99k Total loading time: 0.349 Render date: 2022-12-09T22:45:29.812Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE, Norms, and the “Construction” of Security in Post–Cold War Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2003

Get access

Extract

The end of the Cold War has profoundly transformed Europe's security situation. Although traditional security issues remain important, the most immediate threats to security since 1989 have originated not from relations between states, but from instability and conflict within states that has threatened to spill over into the interstate arena. States' efforts to shape and control this new security environment have resulted in a unique hybrid arrangement containing elements of traditional alliances, great power concerts, state and community building, and collective security.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, Robert. 1986. An Evolutionary Approach to Norms. American Political Science Review 80 (4):1095111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrington, Lowell. 1995. The Domestic and International Consequences of Citizenship in the Soviet Successor States. Europe-Asia Studies 47 (5):73153.Google Scholar
Beck, Robert, J., Anthony Clark Arend, and Robert D. Vander Lugt, eds. 1996. International Rules: Approaches from International Law and International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Betts, Richard K. 1992. Systems for Peace or Causes ofWar? Collective Security, Arms Control, and the New Europe. International Security 17 (1):543.Google Scholar
Bloed, Arie, ed. 1993. The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe: Analysis and Basic Documents, 1972–1993. 2d ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Bloed, Arie. 1994. The Challenges of Change: The Helsinki Summit of the CSCE and Its Aftermath. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas. 1990. Copenhagen:A Democratic Manifesto. World Affairs 153 (1):58.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1998. The ConstructivistTurn in InternationalRelations Theory. World Politics 50 (2): 32448.Google Scholar
Chigas, Diana, with Elizabeth, McClintock and Christophe, Kamp. 1996. Preventive Diplomacy and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe: Creating Incentives for Dialogue and Cooperation. In Preventing Conflict in the Post–Communist World, edited by Abram, Chayes and Antonia Handler, Chayes, 2597. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Dessler, David. 1989. What's at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate? International Organization 43 (3):44173.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 1986. International Human Rights: A Regime Analysis. International Organization 40 (3):599642.Google Scholar
Farer, Tom J. 1993. Collectively Defending Democracy in a World of Sovereign States: The Western Hemisphere's Prospect. Human Rights Quarterly 15 (4):71650.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1993. International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scienti. c, and Cultural Organization and Science Policy. International Organization 47 (4): 56597.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996a. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996b. Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism. International Organization 50 (2):32547.Google Scholar
FIER (Foundation on Inter-Ethnic Relations). 1997. The Role of the High Commissioner on National Minorities in OSCE Conflict Prevention. The Hague: FIER.Google Scholar
Flynn, Gregory. Forthcoming. Europe After the Cold War: Realism, Idealism, and the Struggle for Order Without Empire. In Altered Strategic Landscapes in the Twentieth Century: Essays on the Making of International Order, edited by William I., Hitchcock and Paul, Kennedy. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, Gregory, and David J., Scheffer. 1990. Limited Collective Security. Foreign Policy 80:77101.Google Scholar
Forbes, Ian, and Mark, Hoffmann, eds. 1993. Political Theory, International Relations, and the Ethics of Intervention. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1992. The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance. American Journal of International Law 86 (1):4691.Google Scholar
Genscher, Hans-Dietrich. 1990. Zur deutschen Einheit im europa¨ischen Rahmen (Speech Before the Tutzing Protestant Academy). Der Bundesminister des Auswa¨rtigen Informiert, Mitteilung fu¨r die Presse, No. 1026/1990. Bonn: Bundespresseamt.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Paul, Diehl. 1992. Toward a Theory of International Norms: Some Conceptual and Measurement Issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (4):63466.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, and Robert O., Keohane, eds. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Haas,, Ernst B. 1983. Regime Decay: Conflict Management and International Organizations, 1945–1981. International Organization 37 (2):189256.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Malvina. 1993. The Copenhagen Document: Intervention in Support of Democracy. Harvard International Law Journal 34 (1):16375.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Helsinki Commission. 1992a. The Helsinki Follow-up Meeting of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe: March 24–July 8, 1992.Washington, D.C.: Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.Google Scholar
Helsinki Commission. 1992b. Statement of Sherwood McGinnis, U.S. Delegation to the Helsinki Follow-up Meeting Working Group III (17 June 1992). Washington, D.C.: Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.Google Scholar
Helsinki Commission. 1992c. Statement of Ambassador J. Kenneth Blackwell, U.S. Delegation to the Helsinki Follow- up Meeting,Working Group III (26 May 1992).Washington, D.C.: Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.Google Scholar
Helsinki Commission. 1993. Update on Peaceful Settlement of Disputes in the CSCE Process. Washington, D.C.: Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.Google Scholar
Helsinki Commission. 1994. Max van der Stoel, Controlling Ethnic Tensions: The Experience of the CSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities (remarks at the annual conference of the European Research Centre on Migration and Ethnic Relations (ERCOMER), Utrecht University, 19 September 1994). Washington, D.C.: Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.Google Scholar
Heraclides, Alexis. 1993a. Security and Cooperation in Europe: The Human Dimension, 1972–1992. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Heraclides, Alexis. 1993b. Helsinki II and Its Aftermath: The Making of the CSCE into an International Organization. New York: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Ho¨ynck, Wilhelm. 1994. CSCE Missions in the Field as an Instrument of Preventive DiplomacyTheir Origin and Development. In The Challenge of Preventive Diplomacy, edited by Staffan Carlsson, 5572. Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 1993. International Society and the Study of Regimes: A Reflective Approach. In Regime Theory and International Relations, edited by Volker Rittberger, 4972. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Robert L. 1997. American Diplomacy and the End of the Cold War: An Insider's Account of U.S. Policy in Europe, 1989–1992. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, and Charles A., Kupchan. 1990. Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization 44 (3):283315.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. 1990. Quasi-states: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H.. 1993. The Weight of Ideas in Decolonialization: Normative Change in InternationalRelations. In Ideas and Foreign Policy, edited by Judith, Goldstein and Robert, O. Keohane, 11138. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jepperson, Ronald L., Alexander, Wendt, and Peter J., Katzenstein. 1996. Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security. In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by Peter J., Katzenstein, 3375. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1983. Security Regimes. In InternationalRegimes, edited by Stephen D., Krasner, 17394. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O.. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder, Colo.:Westview Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie. 1995a. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie. 1995b. Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. SanctionsAgainst South Africa. International Organization 49 (3):45178.Google Scholar
Kocs, Stephen A. 1994. Explaining the Strategic Behavior of States: International Law as System Structure. International Studies Quarterly 38 (4):53556.Google Scholar
Korey, William. 1993. The Promises We Keep: Human Rights, the Helsinki Process, and American Foreign Policy. New York: St.Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Kovacs, La´szlo. 1995. The OSCE: Present and Future Challenges. Helsinki Monitor 6 (3):710.Google Scholar
Kowert, Paul, and Jeffrey W., Legro. 1996. Norms, Identity, and Their Limits: A Theoretical Reprise. In The Culture of National Security, edited by Peter J. Katzenstein, 45197. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in InternationalRelations and Domestic Affairs. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, and John Gerard, Ruggie. 1986. International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. International Organization 40 (4):75375.Google Scholar
Lahelma, Timo. 1994. The Role of the CSCE Missions in Preventive DiplomacyThe Case of Estonia: August 1993–June 1994. In The Challenge of Preventive Diplomacy, edited by Staffan, Carlsson, 8799. Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
Lapidus, Gail W. 1998. Contested Sovereignty: The Tragedy of Chechnya. International Security 23 (1):549.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W. 1997. Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the Failure of Internationalism. International Organization 51 (1):3163.Google Scholar
Lehne, Stefan. 1991. The CSCE in the 1990s: Common European House or Potemkin Village? Vienna: Braumu¨ller.Google Scholar
Lyons, Gene M., and Michael, Mastanduno, eds. 1995. Beyond Westphalia?: State Sovereignty and International Intervention. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mans, eld, Edward, D., Jack, Snyder, and Alexander|Wendt. 1995. Democratization and the Danger of War. International Security 20 (1):538.Google Scholar
Maresca, John J. 1985. To Helsinki: The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1973–1975. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 1990. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security 15 (1):556.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. 1990. Democracy and the Rule of Law. World Affairs 153 (1):2327.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51 (4):51353.Google Scholar
Nevers, Rene´e de. 1993. Democratization and Ethnic Conflict. Survival 35 (2): 3148.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 1994. The States System of Europe, 1640–1990: Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
OSCE. 1995. Annual Report 1994 on OSCE Activities. Vienna: OSCE.Google Scholar
OSCE. 1996. Annual Report 1995 on OSCE Activities. Vienna: OSCE.Google Scholar
OSCE. 1997a. Annual Report 1996 on OSCE Activities. Vienna: OSCE.Google Scholar
OSCE. 1997b. Annual Report 1997 on OSCE Activities. Vienna: OSCE.Google Scholar
Rittberger, Volker, ed. 1993. Regime Theory and International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Harold S. 1976. The Helsinki Declaration: Brobdingnagor Lilliput? American Journal of International Law 70 (2):24272.Google Scholar
Schlager, Erika. 1991. The Procedural Framework of the CSCE: From the Helsinki Consultations to the Paris Charter, 1972–90. Human Rights Law Journal 12:22136.Google Scholar
Scho¨pfl in, George. 1996. Nationalism and EthnicMinorities in Post–Communist Europe. In Europe's New Nationalism: States and Minorities in Conflict, edited by Richard, Caplan and John, Feffer, 15168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Paul. 1994. The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shehadi, Kamal S. 1993. Ethnic Self-determination and the Break-up of States. Adelphi Papers No. 283. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
Sheltema, Gajus. 1994. CSCE Peacekeeping Operations. In The Challenges of Change, edited by Arie Bloed, 2345. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Thomson, Janice E. 1993. Norms in International Relations: A Conceptual Analysis. InternationalJournal of Group Tensions 23 (1): 6783.Google Scholar
To¨rnudd, Klaus. 1994. The Role of the CSCE Missions in Preventive DiplomacyThe Case of Estonia. In The Challenge of Preventive Diplomacy, edited by Staffan, Carlsson, 7399. Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
Ugglas, Margarethaaf. 1994. Conditions for Successful Preventive Diplomacy. In The Challenges of Preventive Diplomacy, edited by Staffan, Carlsson, 1132. Stockholm:Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
Weller, Marc. 1992. The International Response to the Dissolution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. American Journal of International Law 86 (3):569607.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1987. The Agent–Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization 41 (3):33570.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46 (2):391425.Google Scholar
Woodward, Susan L. 1995. Balkan Tragedy: Chaos and Dissolution After the Cold War. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Zaagman, Rob. 1994. The CSCE Commissioner on National Minorities: An Analysis of the Mandate and the Institutional Context. In The Challenges of Change, edited by Arie Bloed, 113175. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Zaagman, Rob, and Hannie, Zaal. 1994. The CSCE High Commissioner on NationalMinorities: Prehistory and Negotiations. In The Challenges of Change, edited by Arie Bloed, 95111. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Zelikow, Philip, and Condoleeza, Rice. 1995. Germany United, and Europe Transformed: A Study in Statecraft. Boston, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
47
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE, Norms, and the “Construction” of Security in Post–Cold War Europe
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE, Norms, and the “Construction” of Security in Post–Cold War Europe
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE, Norms, and the “Construction” of Security in Post–Cold War Europe
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *