Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-79b67bcb76-pclkk Total loading time: 0.261 Render date: 2021-05-13T13:46:59.523Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Sabotaging the Peace: The Politics of Extremist Violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2003

Get access

Abstract

Why are extremists able to sabotage peace processes in some cases but not others? And under what conditions will the public respond to such provocation and return to unpopular wars? We seek to show that extremist violence is not indiscriminate or irrational as many people have assumed but quite strategic. We argue that extremist violence intentionally plays on the uncertainty that exists between the more moderate groups who are attempting to negotiate a peace agreement. Using a game-theoretic model of the interaction of extremist violence and mistrust, we identify the conditions under which extremists will succeed and fail. We find that extremists are most likely to succeed in derailing a peace process when the targeted side believes that opposition moderates are strong. At these times, the public perceives moderates as best able to control and suppress extremists within their own ranks. When moderates are viewed as weak and unable to crack down on extremists, terrorism is more likely to fail. We discuss this finding, as well as a number of additional implications of the model, in connection with the Israeli–Palestinian case.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Arian, Asher. 1995. Security Threatened: Surveying Israeli Opinion on Peace and War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Robert H., Grief, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, and Weingast, Barry R.. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cetinyan, Rupen, and Stein, Arthur A.. 1997. Rational Extremism. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
De Figueiredo, Rui, and Weingast, Barry R.. 1998. Vicious Cycles: Endogenous Political Extremism and Political Violence. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1998. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization 52 (2):269305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 1996. Explaining Interethnic Cooperation. American Political Science Review 90 (4):715–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua A., Pevehouse, Jon C., Gerner, Deborah J., and Telhami, Shibley. 2000. Reciprocity, Triangularity, and Cooperation in the Middle East, 1979–1997. Unpublished manuscript. Available at ⟨www.american.edu/academic.depts/sis/goldtext/me98papr.htm⟩.Google Scholar
Güth, Werner, and Kliemt, Hartmut. 1994. Competition or Co-Operation: On the Evolutionary Economics of Trust, Exploitation, and Moral Attitudes. Metroeconomica 45 (2):155–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kass, Ilana, and O'Neill, Bard. 1997. The Deadly Embrace: The Impact of Israeli and Palestinian Rejectionism on the Peace Process. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Kydd, Andrew. 2000. Trust, Reassurance, and Cooperation. International Organization 54 (2):325–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishal, Shaul, and Sela, Avraham. 2000. The Palestinian Hamas: Vision, Violence, and Coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Benny. 1999. Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist–Arab Conflict, 1881–1999. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1994. Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2002. Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Sabotaging the Peace: The Politics of Extremist Violence
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Sabotaging the Peace: The Politics of Extremist Violence
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Sabotaging the Peace: The Politics of Extremist Violence
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *