Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Beyond Institutional Design: Explaining the Performance of International Organizations

Abstract
Abstract

International organizations (IOs) have long been a central focus of scholarship in international relations, yet we know remarkably little about their performance. This article offers an explanation for differences in the performance of IOs and tests it using the first quantitative data set on the topic. I argue that the primary obstacle to effective institutional performance is not deviant behavior by IO officials—as conventional “rogue-agency” analyses suggest—but the propensity of states to use IOs to promote narrow national interests rather than broader organizational objectives. IOs that enjoy policy autonomy vis-à-vis states will thus exhibit higher levels of performance. However, in the international context policy autonomy cannot be guaranteed by institutional design. Instead, it is a function of (1) the existence of (certain types of) institutionalized alliances between IOs and actors above and below the state; and (2) the technical complexity of IO activities. I provide empirical evidence for the argument by constructing and analyzing a cross-sectional data set on IO performance—based in part on a new wave of official government evaluations of IOs and in part on an original survey of IO staff—and conducting a comparative case study in the realm of global food security.

Copyright
References
Hide All
AbbottKenneth W., and Snidal Duncan. 1998. Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1):332.
AbbottKenneth W., and Snidal Duncan. 2000. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54 (3):421–56.
AbbottKenneth W., Genschel Philipp, Snidal Duncan, and Zangl Bernhard, eds. 2015. International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
AlesinaAlberto, Baqir Reza, and Easterly William. 1999. Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (4):1243–84.
AndrewsRhys, Boyne George A., Law Jennifer, and Walker Richard M.. 2005. External Constraints on Local Service Standards: The Case of Comprehensive Performance Assessment in English Local Government. Public Administration 83 (3):639–56.
AscherWilliam. 1983. New Development Approaches and the Adaptability of International Agencies: The Case of the World Bank. International Organization 37 (3):415–39.
Australian Agency for International Development. 2012. Australian Multilateral Assessment. Canberra, Australia. Available at <http://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Pages/australian-multilateral-assessment-ama-full-report.aspx>. Accessed 18 August 2015.
BarnettMichael N. 1997. The UN Security Council, Indifference, and Genocide in Rwanda. Cultural Anthropology 12 (4):551–78.
BarnettMichael N., and Finnemore Martha. 1999. The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization 53 (4):699732.
BarrettChristopher B., and Heisey Kevin C.. 2002. How Effectively Does Multilateral Food Aid Respond to Fluctuating Needs? Food Policy 27 (5):477–91.
BarrettChristopher B., and Maxwell Daniel G.. 2005. Food Aid After Fifty Years: Recasting Its Role. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
BoyneGeorge A. 2002. Concepts and Indicators of Local Authority Performance: An Evaluation of the Statutory Frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money and Management 22 (2):1724.
BoyneGeorge A., Meier Kenneth J., O'Toole Laurence J.Jr. and Walker Richard M. eds. 2006. Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
BuchananAllen, and Keohane Robert O.. 2006. The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions. Ethics and International Affairs 20 (4):405–37.
CameronKim S. 1978. Measuring Organizational Effectiveness in Institutions of Higher Education. Administrative Science Quarterly 23 (4):604–32.
CusackThomas R. 1999. Social Capital, Institutional Structures, and Democratic Performance: A Comparative Study of German Local Governments. European Journal of Political Research 35 (1):134.
Department for International Development (United Kingdom). 2011. Multilateral Aid Review: Ensuring Maximum Value for Money for UK Aid through Multilateral Organisations. London, UK. <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/multilateral-aid-review>. Accessed 20 May 2013.
DreherAxel, and Vaubel Roland. 2004. The Causes and Consequences of IMF Conditionality. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 40 (3):2654.
EasterlyWilliam, and Williamson Claudia R.. 2011. Rhetoric Versus Reality: The Best and Worst of Aid Agency Practices. World Development 39 (11):1930–49.
EtzioniA. 1964. Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hill.
Food and Agriculture Organization. 2007. Report of the Independent External Evaluation of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Conference document C 2007/7A.1-Rev.1, 34th Session. Rome, Italy. Available at <ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/meeting/012/k0827erev1.pdf>. Accessed 14 November 2016.
Food and Agriculture Organization. 2011. Basic Texts of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2011 Edition). Available at <http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/022/k8024e.pdf>. Accessed 14 January 2016.
GutnerTamar, and Thompson Alexander. 2010. The Politics of IO Performance: A Framework. The Review of International Organizations 5 (3):227–48.
HaftelYoram Z., and Thompson Alexander. 2006. The Independence of International Organizations Concept and Applications. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (2):253–75.
HawkinsDarren G., Lake David A., Nielson Daniel L., and Tierney Michael J. eds. 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
HoogheLiesbet, Marks Gary, Lenz Tobias, Bezuijen Jeanine, Ceka Besir, and Derderyan Svet. 2017. Measuring International Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance. Volume 3. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
HopkinsRaymond F. 1992. Reform in the International Food Aid Regime: The Role of Consensual Knowledge. International Organization 46 (1):225–64.
International Labour Organization. 2000. Possible Improvements in the Standard-setting Activities of the ILO, Addendum: Statistics on the Ratification of Conventions. Governing Body Document GB.277.LILS/2(Add.1), 277th Session. Geneva, Switzerland.
JohnsonTana. 2014. Organizational Progeny: Why Governments Are Losing Control over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
KatzensteinPeter J., Keohane Robert O., and Krasner Stephen D.. 1998. International Organization and the Study of World Politics. International Organization 52 (4):645–85.
KnackStephen. 2002. Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the States. American Journal of Political Science 46 (4):772–85.
KoremenosBarbara, Lipson Charles, and Snidal Duncan. 2001. The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization 55 (4):761–99.
Porta La, RafaelFlorencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer Andrei, and Vishny Robert. 1999. The Quality of Government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (1):222–79.
MathiasonJohn. 2007. Invisible Governance: International Secretariats in Global Politics. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
MattliWalter, and Seddon Jack. 2015. Orchestration Along the Pareto Frontier: Winners and Losers. In International Organizations as Orchestrators, edited by Abbott Kenneth W., Genschel Philipp, Snidal Duncan, and Zangl Bernhard, 315–48. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
MillerGary J., and Andrew B.Whitford. 2016. Above Politics: Bureaucratic Discretion and Credible Commitment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Denmark). 2012. Denmark's Engagement in Multilateral Development and Humanitarian Organizations. Copenhagen. Available at <http://um.dk/~/media/UM/Danish-site/Documents/Udenrigspolitik/Nyheder_udenrigspolitik/2012/120709%20Multilateral%20Analysis%202012%20-%20English%20Version.pdf>. Accessed 15 October 2013.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Netherlands). 2013. Scorecards of International Institutions. Available at <http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/rapporten/2013/08/30/scorecards-van-internationale-instellingen.html>. Accessed 15 October 2013.
Ministry for Foreign Affairs (Sweden). 2013. Swedish Assessment of Multilateral Organizations. Available at <http://www.regeringen.se>. Accessed 15 October 2013.
MoeTerry M. 1990. The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy. In Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, edited by Williamson Oliver E., 116–53. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
NeumayerEric. 2005. Is the Allocation of Food Aid Free from Donor Interest Bias? The Journal of Development Studies 41 (3):394411.
PevehouseJon, Nordstrom Timothy, and Warnke Kevin. 2004. The Correlates of War 2 International Governmental Organizations Data Version 2.0. Conflict Management and Peace Science 21 (2):101–19.
PriceJames L. 1972. The Study of Organizational Effectiveness. The Sociological Quarterly 13 (1):315.
PutnamRobert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
QuinnRobert E., and Rohrbaugh John. 1981. A Competing Values Approach to Organizational Effectiveness. Public Productivity Review 5 (2):122–40.
RogoffKenneth. 1985. The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Monetary Target. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 100 (4):1169–89.
StoneRandall W. 2011. Controlling Institutions: International Organizations and the Global Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Union of International Associations. 2015. Yearbook of International Organizations 2015–2016. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Available at <http://www.uia.org/yearbook>. Accessed 8 October 2015.
VaubelRoland. 1986. A Public Choice Approach to International Organization. Public Choice 51 (1):3957.
World Food Programme. 2010. General Regulations, General Rules, Financial Regulations, Rules of Procedure of the Executive Board (November 2010 Edition). Available at <http://www.wfp.org/about/general-regulations>. Accessed 10 June 2014.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Lall supplementary material S1
Lall supplementary material

 Unknown (47 KB)
47 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Lall supplementary material S3
Lall supplementary material

 Unknown (27 KB)
27 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Lall supplementary material S2
Appendix

 Word (891 KB)
891 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 563 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1123 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 30th March 2017 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.