Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Capital Rules: The Domestic Politics of International Regulatory Harmonization

  • David Andrew Singer (a1)

In the past fifteen years, financial regulators from the developed world have attempted to create international regulatory standards in a variety of financial issue areas. Their negotiations are notable for the stark variation in the preferences of regulators toward international regulatory harmonization. Certain regulators actively resist any attempts at regulatory harmonization, while others are vocal in their advocacy for an international agreement. When will regulators seek to harmonize their rules with their foreign counterparts? I propose a principal-agent framework for analyzing regulator behavior that views international harmonization as a means of satisfying domestic political pressures. The framework predicts that regulators are more likely to seek international regulatory harmonization when confidence in the stability of financial institutions is declining, and when competitive pressures are increasing from foreign firms facing less stringent regulations. I explore the consistency of the framework with two important cases in the history of international financial regulation: the negotiations among bank regulators leading up to the 1988 Basel Accord on bank capital adequacy, and the negotiations among securities regulators over capital adequacy for securities firms between 1988 and 1992.I thank Gabe Aguilera, David Bach, Ethan Bueno de Mesquita, Dan Carpenter, Bill Clark, Mark Copelovitch, Jeff Frieden, Dan Gingerich, Dan Ho, Devesh Kapur, Joseph N. R. Sanberg, Ross Schaap, Allan Stam, Matt Stephenson, two anonymous reviewers, and the editors of IO for helpful comments, discussions, and feedback. I am also indebted to the thirty current and former regulators and financial industry executives who participated in interviews to advance this project. Finally, I thank the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs and the Center for European Studies for research funding.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Ferejohn, John, and Charles R.Shipan. 1990. Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization6 (Special Issue):121.

Garrett, Geoffrey, and DeborahMitchell. 2001. Globalization, Government Spending, and Taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research39 (2):14577.

Ho, Daniel E.2002. Compliance and International Soft Law: Why Do Countries Implement the Basle Accord?Journal of International Economic Law5 (3):64788.

Kapstein, Ethan B.1989. Resolving the Regulator's Dilemma: International Coordination of Banking Regulations. International Organization43 (2):32347.

Moe, Terry M.1987. An Assessment of the Positive Theory of Congressional Dominance. Legislative Studies Quarterly12 (4):475520.

Oatley, Thomas, and RobertNabors. 1998. Redistributive Cooperation: Market Failure, Wealth Transfers, and the Basle Accord. International Organization52 (1):3554.

Putnam, Robert D.1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization42 (3):42760.

Simmons, Beth. 2001. The International Politics of Harmonization: The Case of Capital Market Regulation. International Organization55 (3):589620.

Weingast, Barry R.1984. The Congressional-Bureaucratic System: A Principal-Agent Perspective (with Applications to the SEC). Public Choice44 (1):14791.

Weingast, Barry R., and Mark J.Moran. 1983. Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. Journal of Political Economy91 (51):765800.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 74 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 361 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.