Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Power in International Politics

  • Michael Barnett (a1) and Raymond Duvall (a2)
Abstract

The concept of power is central to international relations. Yet disciplinary discussions tend to privilege only one, albeit important, form: an actor controlling another to do what that other would not otherwise do. By showing conceptual favoritism, the discipline not only overlooks the different forms of power in international politics, but also fails to develop sophisticated understandings of how global outcomes are produced and how actors are differentially enabled and constrained to determine their fates. We argue that scholars of international relations should employ multiple conceptions of power and develop a conceptual framework that encourages rigorous attention to power in its different forms. We first begin by producing a taxonomy of power. Power is the production, in and through social relations, of effects that shape the capacities of actors to determine their circumstances and fate. This general concept entails two crucial, analytical dimensions: the kinds of social relations through which power works (in relations of interaction or in social relations of constitution); and the specificity of social relations through which effects are produced (specific/direct or diffuse/indirect). These distinctions generate our taxonomy and four concepts of power: compulsory, institutional, structural, and productive. We then illustrate how attention to the multiple forms of power matters for the analysis of global governance and American empire. We conclude by urging scholars to beware of the idea that the multiple concepts are competing, and instead to see connections between them in order to generate more robust understandings of how power works in international politics.This article was first presented at a conference, “Who Governs in Global Governance?” at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. We thank the participants at the conference, including Emanuel Adler, Alex Wendt, Neta Crawford, Kathryn Sikkink, Helen Kinsella, Martha Finnemore, Jutta Weldes, Jon Pevehouse, Andrew Hurrell, John Ruggie, and especially Duncan Snidal, Robert Keohane, and Charles Kupchan. Other versions were presented at the University of Minnesota and the International Studies Association meetings in Budapest, Hungary in June, 2003. We also want to thank Kurt Burch, Thomas Diez, Tom Donahue, William Duvall, Ayten Gundogdu, Stefano Guzzini, Colin Kahl, Amit Ron, Latha Varadarajan, Michael Williams, Anne-Marie Slaughter, the editors of the journal, and two anonymous reviewers. We also acknowledge the bibliographic assistance of Emilie Hafner-Burton and Jonathan Havercroft.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Abbott, Kenneth, and Duncan Snidal. 1998. Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1):332.

Bachrach, Peter, and Morton Baratz. 1962. Two Faces of Power. American Political Science Review 56 (4):94752.

Bachrach, Peter, and Morton Baratz. 1963. Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytic Framework. American Political Science Review 57 (3):63242.

Baldwin, David. 1980. Interdependence and Power: A Conceptual Analysis. International Organization 34 (4):471506.

Benton, Ted. 1981. Objective Interests and the Sociology of Power. Sociology 15 (2):16184.

Brass, Paul. 2000. Foucault Steals Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science 3:30530.

Caporaso, James. 1978. Dependence, Dependency, and Power in the Global System: A Structural and Behavioral Analysis. International Organization 32 (1):1343.

Checkel, Jeffrey. 2001. Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55 (3):55388.

Clark, Anne Marie, E. Friedman, and Kathryn Hochstetler. 1998. The Sovereign Limits of Global Civil Society: A Comparison of NGO Participation in UN World Conferences on the Environment, Human Rights, and Women. World Politics 51 (1):135.

Cox, Robert. 1992. Multilateralism and World Order. Review of International Studies 18 (2):16180.

Dahl, Robert. 1957. The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science 2 (3):20115.

Digeser, Peter. 1992. The Fourth Face of Power. Journal of Politics 54 (4):9771007.

Emerson, Richard. 1962. Power-Dependence Relations. American Sociological Review 27 (1):3141.

Finnemore, Martha. 1996. Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism. International Organization 50 (2):32547.

Gallie, W. B. 1956. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56:16798.

Garrett, Geoffrey, and George Tsebelis. 1999. Why Resist the Temptation to Apply Power Indices to the European Union? Journal of Theoretical Politics 11 (3):291308.

Gill, Stephen, and David Law. 1989. Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly 33 (4):47599.

Glassman, Jim. 1999. State Power Beyond the ‘Territorial Trap’: The Internationalization of the State. Political Geography 18 (6):66996.

Goldstein, Judith. 1989. The Impact of Ideas on Trade Policy: The Origins of U.S. Agricultural and Manufacturing Policies. International Organization 43 (1):3171.

Gowan, Peter. 2003. U.S. Hegemony Today. Monthly Review 55 (3):3050.

Guzzini, Stefano. 1993. Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis. International Organization 47 (3):44378.

Harrell-Bond, Barbara. 2002. Can Humanitarian Work with Refugees Be Humane? Human Rights Quarterly 24 (1):5185.

Hay, Colin. 1997. Divided by a Common Language: Political Theory and the Concept of Power. Politics 17 (1):4552.

Hurrell, Andrew, and Ngaire Woods. 1993. Globalization and Inequality. Millennium 24 (3):44770.

Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. American Power and the Empire of Capitalist Democracy. Review of International Studies 27 (5):191212.

Ikenberry, G. John. 2002. America's Imperial Ambition. Foreign Affairs 81 (September/October):4460.

Ikenberry, G. John, and Charles A. Kupchan. 1990. Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization 44 (3):283315.

Joachim, Jutta. 2003. Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women's Rights. International Studies Quarterly 47 (2):24774.

Johnstone, Ian. 2003. Security Council Deliberations: The Power of the Better Argument. European Journal of International Law 14 (3):43780.

Jupille, Joseph, James Caporaso, and Jeffrey Checkel. 2003. Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 36 (1–2):740.

Keohane, Robert, and Lisa Martin. 1995. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security 20 (1):3951.

Krasner, Stephen. 1991. Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics 43 (3):33666.

Litwak, Robert. 2002. The New Calculus of Pre-emption. Survival 44 (4):5380.

Mallaby, Sebastian. 2002. The Reluctant Imperialist: Terrorism, Failed States, and the Case for American Empire. Foreign Affairs 81 (2):27.

Mansfield, Edward. 1993. Concentration, Polarity, and the Distribution of Power. International Studies Quarterly 37 (1):10528.

Mehta, Pratap Bhanu. 2003. Empire and Moral Identity. Ethics and International Affairs 17 (2):4962.

Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51 (4):51354.

Neumann, Iver, and Jennifer Welsh. 1991. The Other in European Self-Definition: An Addendum to the Literature on International Society. Review of International Studies 17 (4):32748.

Nye, Joseph. 2003. U.S. Power and Strategy After Iraq. Foreign Affairs 82 (4):6073.

Pierson, Paul. 2000. The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change. Governance 13 (4):47599.

Price, Richard. 1998. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization 52 (3):61344.

Ray, James Lee, and J. David Singer. 1973. Measuring the Concentration of Power in the International System. Sociological Methods & Research 1 (4):40337.

Shaw, Martin. 2002. Post-Imperial and Quasi-Imperial: State and Empire in the Global Era. Millennium 31 (2):32736.

Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1995. International Law in a World of Liberal States. European Journal of International Law 6 (4):50338.

Wendt, Alexander. 1998. On Constitution and Causation in International Relations. Review of International Studies 24 (special issue):10118.

Williams, Michael. 1996. Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration. International Organization 50 (2):21336.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score