Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 62
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Allee, Todd and Elsig, Manfred 2016. Why do some international institutions contain strong dispute settlement provisions? New evidence from preferential trade agreements. The Review of International Organizations, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 89.

    Cormier, Ben 2016. Empowered borrowers? tracking the World Bank’s Program-for-Results. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 209.

    Duruji, Moses Metumara and Urenma, Duruji-Moses Favour 2016. Handbook of Research on Global Indicators of Economic and Political Convergence.

    Panke, Diana 2016. Speech is silver, silence is golden? Examining state activity in international negotiations. The Review of International Organizations,

    Zawahri, Neda A. Dinar, Ariel and Nigatu, Getachew 2016. Governing international freshwater resources: an analysis of treaty design. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 307.

    Berger, Ron 2015. Technological Solutions for Sustainable Business Practice in Asia.

    Keil, Kathrin 2015. Spreading Oil, Spreading Conflict? Institutions Regulating Arctic Oil and Gas Activities. The International Spectator, Vol. 50, Issue. 1, p. 85.

    Lipscy, Phillip Y. 2015. Explaining Institutional Change: Policy Areas, Outside Options, and the Bretton Woods Institutions. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 2, p. 341.

    Rosen, Amanda M. 2015. The Wrong Solution at the Right Time: The Failure of the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change. Politics & Policy, Vol. 43, Issue. 1, p. 30.

    Hastings, Jesse Guite 2014. The rise of Asia in a changing Arctic: a view from Iceland. Polar Geography, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 215.

    Panke, Diana 2014. Is Bigger Better? Activity and Success in Negotiations in the United Nations General Assembly. Negotiation Journal, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 367.

    Mayer, Claude-Hélène and Van Zyl, Llewellyn E. 2013. Perspectives of female leaders on sense of coherence and mental health in an engineering environment. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, Vol. 39, Issue. 2,

    Sprungk, Carina 2013. Legislative Transposition of Directives: Exploring the Other Role of National Parliaments in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 51, Issue. 2, p. 298.

    Hofmann, Stephanie C. 2012. Explaining the EU's Common Security and Defence Policy.

    Kropatcheva, Elena 2012. Russia and the role of the OSCE in European security: a ‘Forum’ for dialog or a ‘Battlefield’ of interests?. European Security, Vol. 21, Issue. 3, p. 370.

    PHELAN, WILLIAM 2012. What IsSui GenerisAbout the European Union? Costly International Cooperation in a Self-Contained Regime. International Studies Review, Vol. 14, Issue. 3, p. 367.

    Chafer, Tony 2011. The AU: a new arena for Anglo-French cooperation in Africa?. The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 49, Issue. 01, p. 55.

    Eccleston, Richard 2011. The OECD and global economic governance. Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 65, Issue. 2, p. 243.

    Kearn, David W. 2011. The hard truths about soft power. Journal of Political Power, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 65.

    Phelan, William 2011. Open international markets without exclusion: encompassing domestic political institutions, international organization, and self-contained regimes. International Theory, Vol. 3, Issue. 02, p. 286.


Interests, power, and multilateralism

  • Lisa L. Martin (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 May 2009

Multilateralism characterizes, to varying degrees, patterns of interaction among states and the formal organizations they construct. The utility of multilateral norms or organizations varies with the type of cooperation problem states confront. Thus, the functional logic of international cooperation leads to hypotheses about the conditions under which the institution of multilateralism may be a feasible and efficient solution, as in coordination problems, and those under which it will not, as in collaboration problems. Within these constraints, powerful states choose institutions that will serve their interests, with multilateral arrangements becoming more attractive as the future is valued more highly. Multilateral institutions should be stable in circumstances of changing distributions of power, relative to more hierarchical institutions. The vulnerability of patterns of international cooperation to various exogenous changes depends on the type of strategic interaction underlying state behavior.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Geoffrey Garrett , “International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community's Internal Market,” International Organization 46 (Spring1992), pp. 533–60;

John Gerard Ruggie , “Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution,” International Organization 46 (Summer1992), pp. 561–98;

James A. Caporaso , “International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: The Search for Foundations,” International Organization 46 (Summer1992), pp. 599632;

Steve Weber , “Shaping the Postwar Balance of Power: Multilateralism in NATO,” International Organization 46 (Summer1992), pp. 633–80;

Miles Kahler , “Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers,” International Organization 46 (Summer1992), pp. 681708;

Robert O. Keohane , “Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research,” International Journal 45 (Autumn1990), pp. 731–64.

Beth V. Yarbrough and Robert M. Yarbrough , “Cooperation in the Liberalization of International Trade: After Hegemony, What?International Organization 41 (Winter1987), p. 4

Duncan Snidal , “Coordination Versus Prisoners ‘Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes,” American Political Science Review 79 (121985), pp. 923–42;

Michael Laver , “Political Solutions to the Collective Action Problem,” Political Studies 28 (061980), pp. 195209

Dilip Abreu , “On the Theory of Infinitely Repeated Games with Discounting,” Econometrica 56 (031988), pp. 383–96;

James Friedman , “A Noncooperative Equilibrium for Supergames,” Review of Economic Studies 38 (011971), pp. 112;

Robert O. Keohane , “Reciprocity in International Relations,” International Organization 40 (Winter1986), pp. 127

Richard P. McKelvey , “Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting: Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control,” Journal of Economic Theory 12 (061976), pp. 472–82

Barry R. Weingast and William J. Marshall , “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets,” Journal of Political Economy 96 (021988), pp. 132–63

Arthur A. Stein , “The Hegemon's Dilemma: Great Britain, the United States, and the International Economic Order,” International Organization 38 (Spring1984), pp. 355–86

Beth V. Yarbrough and Robert M. Yarbrough , “Reciprocity, Bilateralism, and Economic ‘Hostages’: Self-enforcing Agreements in International Trade,” International Studies Quarterly 30 (031986), pp. 721

Stephen D. Krasner , “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier,” World Politics 43 (041991), pp. 336–66

Peter F. Cowhey , “The International Telecommunications Regime: The Political Roots of Regimes for High Technology,” International Organization 44 (Spring1990), pp. 169–99

Michael Mastanduno , “Trade as a Strategic Weapon: American and Alliance Export Control Policy in the Early Postwar Period,” International Organization 42 (Winter1988), pp. 121–50;

James K. Sebenius , “Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties,” International Organization 37 (Spring1983), pp. 281316

Arthur A. Stein , “The Politics of Linkage,” World Politics 33 (101980), pp. 62–81

Michael D. McGinnis , “Issue Linkage and the Evolution of Cooperation,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 30 (031986), pp. 14170.

Robert Jervis , “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics 30 (011978), pp. 5879

Reinhard Selten , “Re-examination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games,” International Journal of Game Theory, vol. 4, no. 1, 1975, pp. 2555

Joanne Gowa , “Rational Hegemons, Excludable Goods, and Small Groups: An Epitaph for Hegemonic Stability Theory?World Politics 41 (041989), pp. 307–24

Glenn H. Snyder , “The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics,” World Politics 36 (071984), pp. 461–95

Joanne Gowa , “Bipolarity, Multipolarity, and Free Trade,” American PoliticalScience Review 83 (121989), pp. 1245–56

Mancur Olson and Richard Zeckhauser , “An Economic Theory of Alliances,” Review of Economics and Statistics 48 (081966), pp. 266–79

John R. Oneal , “Testing the Theory of Collective Action: NATO Defense Burdens, 1950–1984,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 34 (091990), pp. 426–48

Duncan Snidal , “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory,” International Organization 39 (Autumn1985), pp. 579–614

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *