Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 9
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bartelson, Jens 2014. From Empire to Sovereignty—and Back?. Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 28, Issue. 02, p. 251.

    Hosein, Yacoob and Bowen-Chang, Portia 2014. Map cataloguing training at the University of the West Indies, St. Augustine. Library Review, Vol. 63, Issue. 4/5, p. 340.

    Johnson, Dominic D.P. and Toft, Monica Duffy 2014. Grounds for War: The Evolution of Territorial Conflict. International Security, Vol. 38, Issue. 3, p. 7.

    MacKay, Joseph Levin, Jamie de Carvalho, Gustavo Cavoukian, Kristin and Cuthbert, Ross 2014. Before and after borders: The nomadic challenge to sovereign territoriality. International Politics, Vol. 51, Issue. 1, p. 101.

    Zarakol, Ayşe 2014. What made the modern world hang together: socialisation or stigmatisation?. International Theory, Vol. 6, Issue. 02, p. 311.

    Clark, Julian and Jones, Alun 2013. The great implications of spatialisation: Grounds for closer engagement between political geography and political science?. Geoforum, Vol. 45, p. 305.

    Crampton, Jeremy W. 2013. The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Cultural Geography.

    Barnett, Gabrielle 2012. Moving North: engaging community with place through dance. Polar Geography, Vol. 35, Issue. 3-4, p. 291.

    Bukovansky, Mlada 2011. Imagine: Universalism without Empire. International Studies Review, Vol. 13, Issue. 4, p. 654.


Mapping the Sovereign State: Technology, Authority, and Systemic Change

  • Jordan Branch (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 2011

This article examines the effect of cartography on the development of the modern state system. I argue that new mapping technologies in early modern Europe changed how actors thought about political space, organization, and authority, thus shaping the creation of sovereign states and international relations. In particular, mapping was fundamental to three key characteristics of the medieval-to-modern shift: the homogenization of territorial authority, the linearization of political boundaries, and the elimination of nonterritorial forms of organization. Although maps have been interpreted as epiphenomenal to political change, each of these three transformations occurred first in the representational space of maps and only subsequently in the political practices of rulers and states. Based on evidence from the history of cartographic technologies and their use by political actors, the practices and texts of international negotiations, and the practical implementation of linearly bounded territoriality by states, this article argues that changes in the representational practices of mapmaking were constitutive of the early-modern transformation of the authoritative structure of politics. This explanation of the international system's historical transformation suggests useful new directions for investigations into the possibility of fundamental political change due to the economic, social, and technological developments of globalization.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Thomas J. Bassett 1994. Cartography and Empire Building in Nineteenth-Century West Africa. Geographical Review 84 (3):316–35.

Michael Biggs . 1999. Putting the State on the Map: Cartography, Territory, and European State Formation. Comparative Studies in Society and History 41 (2):374405.

Neil Brenner . 1999. Beyond State-Centrism? Space, Territoriality, and Geographic Scale in Globalization Studies. Theory and Society 28 (1):3978.

Hedley Bull . 1977. The Anarchical Society. New York: Columbia University Press.

Walter Carlsnaes . 1992. The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis. International Studies Quarterly 36 (3):245–70.

Jeremy W. Crampton 2009. Cartography: Maps 2.0. Progress in Human Geography 33 (1):91100.

Roxanne Lynn Doty . 1997. Aporia: A Critical Exploration of the Agent-Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations 3 (3):365–92.

R. J. W. Evans 1992. Essay and Reflection: Frontiers and National Identities in Central Europe. International History Review 14 (3):480502.

Michael F. Goodchild 2007. Citizens as Sensors: The World of Volunteered Geography. GeoJournal 69 (4):211–21.

Philip S. Gorski 2003. The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

J. B. Harley 2001. The New Nature of Maps: Essays in the History of Cartography, edited by Paul Laxton . Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Ron E. Hassner 2003. ‘To Halve and to Hold’: Conflicts over Sacred Space and the Problem of Indivisibility. Security Studies 12 (4):133.

Ron E. Hassner 2006/2007. The Path to Intractability: Time and the Entrenchment of Territorial Disputes. International Security 31 (3):107–38.

Geoff King . 1996. Mapping Reality: An Exploration of Cultural Cartographies. London: MacMillan.

Josef W. Konvitz 1990. The Nation-State, Paris and Cartography in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century France. Journal of Historical Geography 16 (1):316.

David A. Lake 2003. The New Sovereignty in International Relations. International Studies Review 5 (3):303–23.

James Mahoney . 1999. Nominal, Ordinal and Narrative Appraisal in Macrocausal Analysis. American Journal of Sociology 104 (4):1154–96.

Christopher C. Miller 2006. A Beast in the Field: The Google Maps Mashups as GIS/2. Cartographica 41 (3):187–99.

Chandra Mukerji . 2006. Printing, Cartography, and Conceptions of Place in Renaissance Europe. Media, Culture & Society 28 (5):651–69.

Thomas Munck . 1990. Seventeenth Century Europe: State, Conflict and the Social Order in Europe, 1598–1700. New York: St. Martin's.

Mark Neocleous . 2003. Off the Map: On Violence and Cartography. European Journal of Social Theory 6 (4):409–25.

Andreas Osiander . 1994. The States System of Europe, 1640–1990: Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

Andreas Osiander . 2007. Before the State: Systemic Political Change in the West from the Greeks to the French Revolution. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Monique Pelletier . 1998. Cartography and Power in France During the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Cartographica 35 (3/4):4153.

Peter Sahlins . 1990. Natural Frontiers Revisited: France's Boundaries Since the Seventeenth Century. American Historical Review 95 (5):1423–51.

Quentin Skinner . 1978. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hendrik Spruyt . 1998. Historical Sociology and Systems Theory in International Relations. Review of International Political Economy 5 (2):340–53.

Philip E. Steinberg 2005. Insularity, Sovereignty, and Statehood: The Representation of Islands on Portolan Charts and the Construction of the Territorial State. Geografiska Annaler 87 (4):253–65.

Jeppe Strandsbjerg . 2008. The Cartographic Production of Territorial Space: Mapping and State Formation in Early Modern Denmark. Geopolitics 13 (2):335–58.

Peter J. Taylor 1995. Beyond Containers: Internationality, Interstateness, Interterritoriality. Progress in Human Geography 19 (1):115.

Peter J. Taylor 2005. New Political Geographies: Global Civil Society and Global Governance through World City Networks. Political Geography 24 (6):703–30.

Colin Wight . 1999. They Shoot Dead Horses Don't They? Locating Agency in the Agent-Structure Problematique. European Journal of International Relations 5 (1):109–42.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *