Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 62
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Anderson, Christopher C. Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin and Schilling, Emily U. 2016. Kantian Dynamics Revisited: Time-Varying Analyses of Dyadic IGO-Conflict Relationships. International Interactions, Vol. 42, Issue. 4, p. 644.

    Bertacchini, Enrico Liuzza, Claudia Meskell, Lynn and Saccone, Donatella 2016. The politicization of UNESCO World Heritage decision making. Public Choice, Vol. 167, Issue. 1-2, p. 95.

    Choi, Seung-Whan and Piazza, James A. 2016. Ethnic groups, political exclusion and domestic terrorism. Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 27, Issue. 1, p. 37.

    Grigorescu, Alexandru and Melin, Molly M. 2016. Multilateral Institutions and Conflict Resolution. Conflict Resolution Quarterly,

    Xiang, Jun 2016. Dyadic Effects, Relevance, and the Empirical Assessment of the Kantian Peace. International Interactions, p. 1.

    Hwang, Wonjae Sanford, Amanda G. and Lee, Junhan 2015. Does Membership on the UN Security Council Influence Voting in the UN General Assembly?. International Interactions, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 256.

    Kamel, Amir M. 2015. The Political Economy of EU Ties with Iraq and Iran.

    Castro, Paula Hörnlein, Lena and Michaelowa, Katharina 2014. Constructed peer groups and path dependence in international organizations: The case of the international climate change negotiations. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 25, p. 109.

    Drury, A. Cooper James, Patrick and Peksen, Dursun 2014. Neo-Kantianism and Coercive Diplomacy: The Complex Case of Economic Sanctions. International Interactions, Vol. 40, Issue. 1, p. 25.

    Rathbun, Brian 2014. Wedges and Widgets: Liberalism, Libertarianism, and the Trade Attitudes of the American Mass Public and Elites. Foreign Policy Analysis, p. n/a.

    Choi, Seung-Whan and Luo, Shali 2013. Economic Sanctions, Poverty, and International Terrorism: An Empirical Analysis. International Interactions, Vol. 39, Issue. 2, p. 217.

    Laks Hutnick, Jennifer A. 2013. Implemented Institutional Design and Conflict. International Studies Review, Vol. 15, Issue. 3, p. 438.

    Stroup, Sarah S. and Murdie, Amanda 2012. There’s no place like home: Explaining international NGO advocacy. The Review of International Organizations, Vol. 7, Issue. 4, p. 425.

    Ungerer, Jameson Lee 2012. Assessing the Progress of the Democratic Peace Research Program. International Studies Review, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Dafoe, Allan 2011. Statistical Critiques of the Democratic Peace: Caveat Emptor. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 55, Issue. 2, p. 247.

    GEIS, ANNA and WAGNER, WOLFGANG 2011. How far is it from Königsberg to Kandahar? Democratic peace and democratic violence in International Relations. Review of International Studies, Vol. 37, Issue. 04, p. 1555.

    Rosato, Sebastian and Schuessler, John 2011. A Realist Foreign Policy for the United States. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 9, Issue. 04, p. 803.

    Zhang, Jianhong van Witteloostuijn, Arjen and Elhorst, J. Paul 2011. China's Politics and Bilateral Trade Linkages. Asian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 25.

    Chapman, Terrence L. and Wolford, Scott 2010. International Organizations, Strategy, and Crisis Bargaining. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 72, Issue. 1, p. 227.

    Fausett, Elizabeth and Volgy, Thomas J. 2010. Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs) and Interstate Conflict: Parsing Out IGO Effects for Alternative Dimensions of Conflict in Postcommunist Space. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 54, Issue. 1, p. 79.


The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950–85


Immanuel Kant believed that democracy, economic interdependence, and international law and organizations could establish the foundations for “perpetual peace.” Our analyses of politically relevant dyads show that each of the three elements of the Kantian peace makes a statistically significant, independent contribution to peaceful interstate relations. These benefits are evident even when the influence of other theoretically interesting factors—such as relative power, alliances, geographic contiguity, and economic growth—is held constant. Increasing the number of shared memberships in intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) by one standard deviation reduces the incidence of militarized disputes by about 23 percent from the baseline rate for a typical pair of bordering states. If both members of a dyad are democratic, conflict is 35 percent less likely than the baseline; increasing both the dyadic trade–GDP ratio and the trend in trade by a standard deviation reduces the chance of conflict by 38 percent. Together, all the Kantian variables lower the probability of a dispute by 72 percent. We check for reverse causation and find reason to believe that a feedback system is at work, with IGOs reducing conflict and low-conflict dyads joining IGOs. Democracies and interdependent states are more likely to join IGOs with one another, bringing together the three elements of a system for Kantian peace.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *