Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 9
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Carmignani, Fabrizio and Kler, Parvinder 2016. The spillover of war in time and space: exploring some open issues. Applied Economics, p. 1.

    Haynes, Kyle 2016. Diversity and Diversion: How Ethnic Composition Affects Diversionary Conflict. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 60, Issue. 2, p. 258.

    Linke, Andrew M. Schutte, Sebastian and Buhaug, Halvard 2015. Population Attitudes and the Spread of Political Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Studies Review, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 26.

    Tollefsen, Andreas Forø and Buhaug, Halvard 2015. Insurgency and Inaccessibility. International Studies Review, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 6.

    Bakke, Kristin M. 2014. Help Wanted?. International Security, Vol. 38, Issue. 4, p. 150.

    Černy, Hannes 2014. Ethnic Alliances Deconstructed: The PKK Sanctuary in Iraqi Kurdistan and the Internationalization of Ethnic Conflict Revisited. Ethnopolitics, Vol. 13, Issue. 4, p. 328.

    Dixon, Jeffrey S. 2014. What Causes Civil Conflicts? Back to “Grievance vs. Greed”. International Studies Review, Vol. 16, Issue. 4, p. 668.

    Juan Masullo, J. and Jone Lauzurika, Bajo 2014. Bringing the ‘New Wars’ Debate Back on Track: Building on Critiques, Identifying Opportunities, and Moving Forward. Global Policy, p. n/a.

    Pang, Xun 2014. Bayesian Inference in the Social Sciences.


Transborder Ethnic Kin and Civil War

  • Lars-Erik Cederman (a1), Kristian Skrede Gleditsch (a2), Idean Salehyan (a3) and Julian Wucherpfennig (a4)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 16 April 2013

A series of studies has shown that civil wars are caused not only by factors inside countries, but also by effects operating across state borders. Whereas a first wave of quantitative studies demonstrated that such effects make the “closed-polity” assumption untenable, more recently researchers have identified particular causal mechanisms driving conflict. Despite these recent advances, a central puzzle remains unresolved, namely why ethnic groups that at least in theory could count on support from large transborder ethnic kin (TEK) groups often have remained surprisingly peaceful, such as the stranded Russian populations in the “near abroad.” We propose a theoretical framework that extends the analysis from the primary dyad between the incumbent and the challenger group by adding a secondary dyad that pits the incumbent against the TEK group. We postulate a curvilinear effect of the TEK group's relative size on conflict onset. Using a new data set on transnational ethnic links, we find that that the risk of conflict increases within the middle range of the size spectrum, consistent with our main hypothesis. This means that large TEK groups have a conflict-dampening effect, provided that they control their own state. Excluded TEK groups, however, are not associated with lower conflict probabilities.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Nathaniel Beck , Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard M. Tucker. 1998. Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 42 (4):1260–88.

Geoffrey Blainey . 1973. The Causes of War. New York: Free Press.

Rogers Brubaker . 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lars-Erik Cederman , Halvard Buhaug, and Jan Ketil Rød. 2009. Ethno-Nationalist Dyads and Civil War: A GIS-Based Analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (4):496525.

Paul Collier , and Anke Hoeffler. 2004. Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers 56 (4):563–95.

David R. Davis , and Will H. Moore. 1997. Ethnicity Matters: Transnational Ethnic Alliances and Foreign Policy Behavior. International Studies Quarterly 41 (1):171–84.

Mustafa Emirbayer , and Chad Alan Goldberg. 2005. Pragmatism, Bourdieu, and Collective Emotions in Contentious Politics. Theory and Society 34 (5-6):469518.

Daniel S. Geller 1993. Power Differentials and War in Rival Dyads. International Studies Quarterly 37 (2):173–93.

Kristian Skrede Gleditsch . 2007. Transnational Dimensions of Civil War. Journal of Peace Research 44 (3):293309.

Nils Petter Gleditsch , Peter Wallensteen, Mikael Eriksson, Margareta Sollenberg, and Håvard Strand. 2002. Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 39 (5):615–37.

Jack A. Goldstone 2001. Toward a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 4:139–87.

Roger V. Gould 1991. Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871. American Sociological Review 56 (6):716–29.

Lindsay Heger , and Idean Salehyan. 2007. Ruthless Rulers: Coalition Size and the Severity of Civil Conflict. International Studies Quarterly 51 (2):385403.

Kalevi J. Holsti 1996. The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stathis N. Kalyvas 2008. Ethnic Defection in Civil War. Comparative Political Studies 41 (8):1043–68.

Charles King , and Neil J. Melvin. 1999/2000. Diaspora Politics: Ethnic Linkages, Foreign Policy, and Security in Eurasia. International Security 24 (3):108–38.

Douglas Lemke , and Suzanne Werner. 1996. Power Parity, Commitment to Change, and War. International Studies Quarterly 40 (2):235–60.

Roger D. Petersen 2002. Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, and Resentment in Twentieth-Century Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stephen M. Saideman 2001. The Ties That Divide: Ethnic Politics, Foreign Policy, and International Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.

Stephen M. Saideman , and R. William Ayres. 2000. Determining the Causes of Irredentism: Logit Analyses of Minorities at Risk Data from the 1980s and 1990s. Journal of Politics 62 (4):1126–44.

Stephen M. Saideman , and R. William Ayres. 2008. For Kin or Country: Xenophobia, Nationalism, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.

Idean Salehyan , and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch. 2006. Refugees and the Spread of Civil War. International Organization 60 (2):335–66.

Nicholas Sambanis . 2001. Do Ethnic and Nonethnic Civil Wars Have the Same Causes? A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry (Part 1). Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (3):259–82.

Yossi Shain , and Aharon Barth. 2003. Diasporas and International Relations Theory. International Organization 57 (3):449–79.

Clayton L. Thyne 2006. Cheap Signals with Costly Consequences: The Effect of Interstate Relations on Civil War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (6):937–61.

Stephen Van Evera . 1994. Hypotheses on Nationalism and War. International Security 18 (4):539.

R. Harrison Wagner . 2000. Bargaining and War. American Journal of Political Science 44 (3):469–84.

Barbara F. Walter 2009. Bargaining Failures and Civil War. Annual Review of Political Science 12:243–61.

Nils B. Weidmann , Jan Ketil Rød, and Lars-Erik Cederman. 2010. Representing Ethnic Groups in Space: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 47 (4):491–99.

Douglas Woodwell . 2004. Unwelcome Neighbors: Shared Ethnicity and International Conflict During the Cold War. International Studies Quarterly 48 (1):197223.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *