Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

What Is Litigation in the World Trade Organization Worth?

Abstract
Abstract

Conventional wisdom holds that the creation of international, court-like institutions helps countries to peacefully settle trade conflicts, thereby enhancing overall welfare. Many have argued, however, that these institutions remain ultimately ineffective because they merely reflect the distribution of power in the anarchic international system. We argue that international litigation provides economic spillovers that create opportunities for judicial free-riding and explore empirically how litigation in the World Trade Organization affects bilateral trade between countries involved in a trade dispute. We use a matching approach to compare the dynamics of trade flows between countries that experienced a panel ruling with trade relations of observably similar country pairs that did not experience a ruling. Based on this comparison we find that sectoral exports from complainant countries to the defendant increase by about $7.7 billion in the three years after a panel ruling. However, countries that have proactively filed a complaint and carried the main costs of litigation do not systematically gain more than less-active third parties that merely joined an existing trade dispute. This suggests that international judicial institutions can provide positive economic externalities and may thereby lead to a less power-based distribution of the gains from trade.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Kenneth W. Abbott , and Duncan Snidal . 1998. Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1):332.

Kenneth W. Abbott , Robert O. Keohane , Andrew Moravcsik , Anne-Marie Slaughter , and Duncan Snidal . 2000. The Concept of Legalization. International Organization 54 (3):401–19.

Leonardo Baccini , and Soo Yeon Kim . 2012. Preventing Protectionism: International Institutions and Trade Policy. Review of International Organizations 7 (4):369–98.

Chad P. Bown 2004a. Developing Countries as Plaintiffs and Defendants in GATT/WTO Trade Disputes. World Economy 27 (1):5980.

Chad P. Bown 2005a. Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement: Complainants, Interested Parties, and Free Riders. World Bank Economic Review 19 (2):287310.

Marc L. Busch 2000. Democracy, Consultation, and the Paneling of Disputes Under GATT. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (4):425–46.

Marc L. Busch , and Krzysztof J. Pelc . 2010. The Politics of Judicial Economy at the World Trade Organization. International Organization 64 (2):257–79.

Songying Fang . 2008. The Informational Role of International Institutions and Domestic Politics. American Journal of Political Science 52 (2):304–21.

Judith Goldstein , Douglas Rivers , and Michael Tomz . 2007. Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade. International Organization 61 (1):3767.

Andrew Guzman , and Beth A. Simmons . 2002. To Settle or Empanel? An Empirical Analysis of Litigation and Settlement at the World Trade Organization. Journal of Legal Studies 31 (1):205–35.

Emilie M. Hafner-Burton , David G. Victor , and Yonatan Lupu . 2012. Political Science Research on International Law: The State of the Field. American Journal of International Law 106 (1):4797.

Laurence R. Helfer , and Erik Voeten . 2013. International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe. International Organization 68 (1):77110.

Paul K. Huth , Sarah E. Croco , and Benjamin J. Appel . 2013. Bringing Law to the Table: Legal Claims, Focal Points, and the Settlement of Territorial Disputes Since 1945. American Journal of Political Science 57 (1):90103.

Moonhawk Kim . 2008. Costly Procedures: Divergent Effects of Legalization in the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures. International Studies Quarterly 52 (3):657–86.

David A. Lake 2010. Rightful Rules: Authority, Order, and the Foundation of Global Governance. International Studies Quarterly 54 (3):587613.

Giovanni Maggi , and Robert W. Staiger . 2011. The Role of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Trade Agreements. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (1):475515.

Jee-Hyeong Park . 2011. Enforcing International Trade Agreements with Imperfect Private Monitoring. Review of Economic Studies 78 (3):1102–34.

Dennis P. Quinn , and John T. Woolley . 2001. Democracy and National Economic Performance: The Preference for Stability. American Journal of Political Science 45 (3):634–57.

Donald B. Rubin 1979. Using Multivariate Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Control Bias in Observational Studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (366a):318–28.

Thomas Sattler , and Thomas Bernauer . 2011. Gravitation or Discrimination? Determinants of Litigation in the World Trade Organization. European Journal of Political Research 50 (2):143–67.

Beth A. Simmons 2005. Rules Over Real Estate: Trade, Territorial Conflict, and International Borders as Institution. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (6):823–48.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Bechtel and Sattler supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (336 KB)
336 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 204 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 422 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.