Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Consensus and variations in opinions on delirium care: a survey of European delirium specialists

  • A. Morandi (a1) (a2), D. Davis (a3), J. K. Taylor (a4), G. Bellelli (a2) (a5), B. Olofsson (a6), S. Kreisel (a7), A. Teodorczuk (a8), B. Kamholz (a9), W. Hasemann (a10), J. Young (a11), M. Agar (a12) (a13), S. E. de Rooij (a14), D. Meagher (a15), M. Trabucchi (a2) (a16) and A. M. MacLullich (a17)...
Abstract
Background:

There are still substantial uncertainties over best practice in delirium care. The European Delirium Association (EDA) conducted a survey of its members and other interested parties on various aspects of delirium care.

Methods:

The invitation to participate in the online survey was distributed among the EDA membership. The survey covered assessment, treatment of hyperactive and hypoactive delirium, and organizational management.

Results:

A total of 200 responses were collected (United Kingdom 28.6%, Netherlands 25.3%, Italy 15%, Switzerland 9.7%, Germany 7.1%, Spain 3.8%, Portugal 2.5%, Ireland 2.5%, Sweden 0.6%, Denmark 0.6%, Austria 0.6%, and others 3.2%). Most of the responders were doctors (80%), working in geriatrics (45%) or internal medicine (14%). Ninety-two per cent of the responders assessed patients for delirium daily. The most commonly used assessment tools were the Confusion Assessment Method (52%) and the Delirium Observation Screening Scale (30%). The first-line choice in the management of hyperactive delirium was a combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches (61%). Conversely, non-pharmacological management was the first-line choice in hypoactive delirium (67%). Delirium awareness (34%), knowledge (33%), and lack of education (13%) were the most commonly reported barriers to improving the detection of delirium. Interestingly, 63% of the responders referred patients after an episode of delirium to a follow-up clinic.

Conclusions:

This is the first systematic survey involving an international group of specialists in delirium. Several areas of lack of consensus were found. These results emphasise the importance of further research to improve care of this major unmet medical need.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Consensus and variations in opinions on delirium care: a survey of European delirium specialists
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Consensus and variations in opinions on delirium care: a survey of European delirium specialists
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Consensus and variations in opinions on delirium care: a survey of European delirium specialists
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Corresponding author
Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr Alessandro Morandi, MD, MPH Via Aselli 16, Cremona, 26100, Italy. Phone: +39-03725357753; Fax: +39-03725357705. Email: morandi.alessandro@gmail.com.
References
Hide All
Cadogan, F. L.et al. (2009). Current awareness of delirium in the intensive care unit: a postal survey in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Medicine, 67, 296300.
Ceraso, D. H.et al. (2010). Latin American survey on delirium in critical patients. Medicina Intensiva, 34, 495505.
Cole, M. G.et al. (2009). Persistent delirium in older hospital patients: a systematic review of frequency and prognosis. Age Ageing, 38, 1926.
Collins, N.et al. (2010). Detection of delirium in the acute hospital. Age Ageing, 39, 131135.
Davis, D. and MacLullich, A. (2009). Understanding barriers to delirium care: a multicentre survey of knowledge and attitudes amongst UK junior doctors. Age Ageing, 38, 559–63.
Davis, D. H.et al. (2012). Delirium is a strong risk factor for dementia in the oldest-old: a population-based cohort study. Brain 135, 28092816.
Devlin, J. W.et al. (2011). Current perceptions and practices surrounding the recognition and treatment of delirium in the intensive care unit: a survey of 250 critical care pharmacists from eight states. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 45, 12171229.
Ely, E. W. (2001). Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 27032710.
Ely, E. W.et al. (2004). Current opinions regarding the importance, diagnosis, and management of delirium in the intensive care unit: a survey of 912 healthcare professionals. Critical Care Medicine, 32, 106–12.
Fang, C. K.et al. (2008). Prevalence, detection and treatment of delirium in terminal cancer inpatients: a prospective survey. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 38, 5663.
Fong, T. G.et al. (2009). Delirium accelerates cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology, 72, 15701575.
Forsgren, L. M. and Eriksson, M. (2010). Delirium – awareness, observation and interventions in intensive care units: a national survey of Swedish ICU head nurses. Intensive Critical Care Nursing, 26, 296303.
Girard, T. D.et al. (2010). Delirium as a predictor of long-term cognitive impairment in survivors of critical illness. Critical Care Medicine 38, 15131520.
Inouye, S. K., Schlesinger, M. J. and Lydon, T. J. (1999). Delirium: a symptom of how hospital care is failing older persons and a window to improve quality of hospital care. American Journal of Medicine, 106, 565573.
Leentjens, A. F.et al. (2008). A comparison of the phenomenology of pediatric, adult, and geriatric delirium. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64, 219223.
Mac Sweeney, R.et al. (2010). A national survey of the management of delirium in UK intensive care units. QJM, 103, 243251.
Maher, A. R.et al. (2011). Efficacy and comparative effectiveness of atypical antipsychotic medications for off-label uses in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of American Medical Association, 306, 13591369.
Meagher, D. J. (2010). Impact of an educational workshop upon attitudes towards pharmacotherapy for delirium. International Psychogeriatrics, 22, 938946.
Meagher, D. J.et al. (2013). What do we really know about the treatment of delirium with antipsychotics? Ten key issues for delirium pharmacotherapy. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2012.09.008. [Epub ahead of print]
Meyer-Massetti, C.et al. (2010). The FDA-extended warning for intravenous haloperidol and torsades de pointes: how should institutions respond? Journal of Hospital Medicine, 5, E8–16.
Morandi, A.et al. (2010). Neuroimaging in delirious intensive care unit patients: a preliminary case series report. Psychiatry (Edgmont), 7, 2833.
Morgan, D. G.et al. (2009). Improving access to dementia care: development and evaluation of a rural and remote memory clinic. Aging Mental Health, 13, 1730.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2010). Delirium: diagnosis, prevention and managment. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/CG103; last accessed 15 May 2013.
Ouimet, S.et al. (2007). Incidence, risk factors and consequences of ICU delirium. Intensive Care Medicine, 33, 6673.
Partridge, J. S.et al. (2013). The delirium experience: what is the effect on patients, relatives and staff and what can be done to modify this? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28, 804812.
Patel, R. P.et al. (2009). Delirium and sedation in the intensive care unit: survey of behaviors and attitudes of 1384 healthcare professionals. Critical Care Medicine, 37, 825832.
Ryan, D. J.et al. (2013). Delirium in an adult acute hospital population: predictors, prevalence and detection. Britisih Medical Journal Open, e001772, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001772.
Teodorczuk, A., Reynish, E. and Milisen, K. (2012). Improving recognition of delirium in clinical practice, a call for action. BMC Geriatrics, 12, 55.
Van Eijk, M. M., Kesecioglu, J. and Slooter, A. J. (2008). Intensive care delirium monitoring and standardised treatment: a complete survey of Dutch intensive care units. Intensive Critical Care Nursing, 24, 218221.
Witlox, J.et al. (2010). Delirium in elderly patients and the risk of postdischarge mortality, institutionalization, and dementia: a meta-analysis. Journal of American Medical Association, 304, 443451.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Psychogeriatrics
  • ISSN:
  • EISSN:
  • URL: /core/journals/international-psychogeriatrics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Morandi Supplementary Material
Appendix

 Word (70 KB)
70 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Morandi Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Material

 Word (34 KB)
34 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed