Skip to main content Accessibility help

The legal appearances of dementia in court rulings: mapping the terrain

  • Israel (Issi) Doron (a1), Perla Werner (a2), Benny Spanier (a3) and Ori Lazar (a4)



Individuals with dementia may appear before the court in different roles: as victims, as witnesses, and as those standing up for their rights. While there is growing interest in the rights of older persons with dementia, relatively little empirical data exists regarding their actual interactions in courts. Therefore, the goal of this study was to empirically map this legal terrain.


This study used a descriptive quantitative method. A computerized search of a national legal database limited to the period 2004–2014 and a screening process for the results were used to establish a sample of 280 court rulings that directly addressed dementia. All cases were analyzed and categorized into the following four criteria groups: characteristics of the person with dementia; characteristics of the legal procedure; the legal substance of the case; and the legal outcome.


The majority of cases involved a single, very-elderly (i.e. over 80 years) woman, living in the community, with unspecified dementia. The majority of cases were heard and decided in lower level courts, addressing a broad range of primarily non-criminal legal issues. Finally, in the majority of non-criminal cases, the person with dementia was found to be legally capable, whereas in the majority of criminal cases, the person with dementia was found incapable.


The legal needs and rights of persons with dementia are much broader than issues of legal capacity or social protection. Deeper knowledge and more research is needed in order to fully understand the contexts in which dementia is constructed under the law.


Corresponding author

Correspondence should be addressed to: Prof. Israel (Issi) Doron, Head of the Department of Gerontology, University of Haifa, 31905, Haifa, Israel. Phone: +972-4-8240815; Fax: +972-4-8240573. Email:


Hide All
Boyle, G. (2008). The Mental Capacity Act 2005: promoting the citizenship of people with dementia?. Health and Social Care in the Community, 16, 529537. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00775.x.
Boyle, G. (2010). Social policy for people with dementia in England: promoting human rights? Health and Social Care in the Community, 18, 511519. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00928.x
Brookmeyer, R., Johnson, E., Ziegler-Graham, K. and Arrighi, H. M. (2007). Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's and Dementia, 3, 186191. doi:
Clifford, J. (2011). The UN disability convention and its impact on European equality law. The Equal Rights Review, 6, 1125.
Donnelly, M. (2014). A legal overview. In Foster, C., Herring, J. and Doron, I. (eds.), The Law and Ethics of Dementia (pp. 271281). Oxford: Hart.
Doron, I. (2002). A perspective on ontario's adult guardianship law: the role of law in adjudicating disputes caused by old men marrying young women. The Elder Law Review, 1, 4354.
Doron, I. (2004). Ageing in the shadow of law: elder guardianship in Israel. Journal of Ageing and Social Policy, 16, 5977. doi:10.1300/J031v16n04_04.
Doron, I. (2006). Elder law: current issues and future frontiers. European Journal on Ageing,3, 6066. doi: 10.1007/s10433-006-0019-z.
Doron, I. (2012). A judicial rashomon: on ageism and narrative justice. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology,27, 1728. doi:10.1007/s10823-012-9160-7
Doron, I. (2013). Older Europeans and the European court of justice. Age and Ageing, 42, 604608. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft053.
Doron, I. (2014). The socio-demographics of dementia. In Foster, C., Herring, J., and Doron, I. (eds.), Dementia, Law and Ethics (pp. 1524). Oxford: Hart.
Doron, I. and Apter, I. (2010). The debate around the need for an international convention on the rights of older persons. The Gerontologist, 50, 586593. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq016
Doron, I. and Foster, C. (2016). Is there a duty to respect 'Historical' faith? Christian proselytism of an older Jewish woman with dementia. Journal of Law and Religion, 31, 118129. doi:
Doron, I. and Hoffman, A. (2005). Time for law: legal literacy and gerontological education. Journal of Gerontological Education, 31, 627642. doi:10.1080/03601270591003373
Doron, I. and Meenan, H. (2012). Time for geriatric jurisprudence. Gerontology, 58, 193196. doi:10.1159/000335324
Doyle, S. and Flynn, E. (2013). Ireland's ratification of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: challenges and opportunities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 171180. doi: 10.1111/bld.12050
Estes, C. L. (2001). Social Policy and Aging. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fellows, L. K. (1998). Competency and consent in dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46, 922926. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02734.x
Ferri, C. P. et al. (2006). Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. The Lancet, 366, 21122117. doi:
Foster, C., Herring, J. and Doron, I. (eds.) (2014). The Law and Ethic of Dementia. Oxford: Hart.
Harpur, P. and Bales, R. (2010). The positive impact of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: a case study on the South Pacific and lessons from the U.S. experience. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 37, 363388.
Jacoby, R. (2010). Legal issues and dementia. In Ames, D., Burns, A. and O'Brien, J. T. (eds.), Dementia, 4th edn. (pp. 279283). BocaRaton, FL: CRC Press.
Kane, M. N. (2001). Legal guardianship and other alternatives in the care of elders with Alzheimer's disease. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and other Dementias, 16, 8996. doi: 10.1177/153331750101600208
Kanter, A. S. (2009). The United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and its implications for the rights of elderly people under international law. Georgia State University Law Review, 527–573.
Kapp, M. B. (2008). Legal issues in dementia. International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine, 20, 91104. doi: 10.3233/JRS-2008-0429
Kapp, M. (2002). Legal standards for the medical diagnosis and treatment of dementia. Journal of Legal Medicine, 23, 359402. doi: 10.1080/01947640290050256
Kapp, M. (2003). The Law and Older Persons: Is Geriatric Jurisprudence Therapeutic?. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Kelly, F. and Innes, A. (2013). Human rights, citizenship and dementia care nursing. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 8, 6170. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2011.00308.x
King, L. and Series, H. (2014). Assessing capacity. In Foster, C., Herring, J. and Doron, I. (eds.), The Law and Ethics of Dementia (pp. 283300). Oxford, UK: Hart.
Larson, J. E. and Corrigan, P. (2008). The stigma of families with mental illness. Academic Psychiatry, 32, 8791. doi:10.1176/appi.ap.32.2.87
Lee, T. S. and Krishnan, K. R. (2010). Alzheimer's disease – the inexorable epidemic. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, 39, 505506.
Liptzin, B., Peisah, C., Shulman, K. and Finkel, S. (2010). Testamentary capacity and delirium. International Psychogeriatrics, 22, 950956. doi: 10.1017/S1041610210000712.
Lo, B. (1990). Assessing decision-making capacity. Law, Medicine and Health Care, 18, 193201. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.1990.tb00022.x.
Love, H., Kelly, F. and Doron, I. (2013). Age and ageism in sentencing practices: outcomes from a case law review. Canadian Criminal Law Journal, 17, 253280.
Low, L. F. et al. (2010). Recognition, attitudes, and causal beliefs regarding dementia in Italian, Greek and Chinese Australians. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 30, 499508. doi:10.1159/000321667.
Mäki-Petäjä-Leinonen, A. (2016). Protecting a person with dementia through restrictions of freedom? Notions of autonomy in the theory and practice of elder care. In Griffiths, A., Mustasaari, S. and Mäki-Petäjä-Leinonen, A. (eds.), Subjectivity, Citizenship and Belonging in Law: Identities and Intersections (chapter 8). Oxford: Routledge.
Manthrope, J., Samsi, K. and Rapaport, J. (2012). More of a leg to stand on: view and usage of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 among staff of local Alzheimer's society and carer organizations. Aging and Mental Health, 16, 102109. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.628971
Marson, D. C., Ingram, K. K., Cody, H. A. and Harrell, L. E. (1995). Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer's disease under different legal standards: a prototype instrument. Archives of Neurology, 52, 949954. doi:10.1001/archneur.1995.00540340029010.
McLeod, R., Philpin, C., Sweeting, A., Joyce, L. and Evans, R. (2010). Court Experience of Adults with Mental Health Conditions, Learning Disabilities, and Limited Mental Capacity – Report 3: At Court. London: Ministry of Justice. Available at:; last accessed 10 October 2016.
Monaghan, C. and Begley, A. (2004). Dementia diagnosis and disclosure: a dilemma in practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13, 2229. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00922.x
Navot, S. (2007). The Constitutional Law of Israel. The Netherlands: Kluwer.
O'Neill, N. and Peisah, C. (2011). Capacity and the Law. Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press.
Peng, F. C. (2003). Is dementia a disease?. Gerontology, 49, 384391. doi: 10.1159/000073767.
Prince, M. and Jackson, J. (2009). World Alzheimer Report. London, UK: Alzheimer's Disease International.
Quinn, G. and Doyle, S. (2012). Taking the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities seriously – the past and future of the EU structural funds as a tool to achieve community living. The Equal Rights Review, 9, 6994.
Román, G. C. (2002). Vascular dementia may be the most common form of dementia in the elderly. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 203, 710.
Shulman, K., Peisah, C., Jacoby, R., Heinik, J. and Finkel, S. (2009). Contemporaneous assessment of testamentary capacity. International Psychogeriatrics, 21, 433–9. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209008874.
Spanier, B., Doron, I. and Milman, F. (2013). Older persons and the European court of human rights. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 28, 407. doi: 420.10.1007/s10823-013-9212-7
Swaffer, K. (2014). Dementia: stigma, language, and dementia-friendly. Dementia, 13, 709716. doi: 10.1177/1471301214548143
Wagner, W. E. (2010). Using SPSS for Social Statistics and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Welsh, S., Hassiotis, A., O'mahoney, G. and Deahl, M. (2003). Big brother is watching you – the ethical implications of electronic surveillance measures in the elderly with dementia and in adults with learning difficulties. Aging and Mental Health, 7, 372375. doi: 10.1080/1360786031000150658
Werner, P. and Doron, I. (2016). Alzheimer's disease and the law: positive and negative consequences of structural stigma and labeling in the legal system. Aging and Mental Health. Epub ahead of print, doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1211989
Werner, P. and Heinik, J. (2008). Stigma by association and Alzheimer's disease. Aging and Mental Health, 12, 9299. doi: 10.1080/13607860701616325
Woods, B. and Pratt, R. (2005). Awareness in dementia: ethical and legal issues in relation to people with dementia. Aging and Mental Health, 9, 423429. doi: 10.1080/13607860500143125.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The legal appearances of dementia in court rulings: mapping the terrain

  • Israel (Issi) Doron (a1), Perla Werner (a2), Benny Spanier (a3) and Ori Lazar (a4)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.