Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Baxi, Pratiksha 2014. Sexual Violence and Its Discontents*. Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 43, Issue. 1, p. 139.


    Pande, Ishita 2013. Phulmoni's body: the autopsy, the inquest and the humanitarian narrative on child rape in India. South Asian History and Culture, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 9.


    Hale, Matthew Raymond, Graham and Wright, Catherine 2011. List of publications on the economic and social history of Great Britain and Ireland published in 2010. The Economic History Review, Vol. 64, Issue. 4, p. 1336.


    ×

The Rule of Colonial Indifference: Rape on Trial in Early Colonial India, 1805–57

Abstract

This article explores the history of intraracial (Indian-on-Indian) rape in early colonial India. Though at times uneven and unpredictable in their rulings, British judges created a set of evidentiary requirements and a body of legal decisions that were as harsh on rape victims as the precolonial Islamic system was presumed to be. Despite the colonial promise of a more modern and humane criminal law, the gradual displacement of Islamic law did little to widen rape victims' path to legal remedy. English common law presumptions about the frequency of false charges and a suspicion of women's claims combined with a colonial insistence on the peculiarity of Indian culture to make it difficult for victims of rape to prevail in court. The colonial legal treatment of the “unsensational” crime of rape was rather unsensational. It largely reflected contemporary trends in England, which raises the important question of what was distinctively colonial about it. 

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Catherine Burns . 2005. Sexual Violence and the Law in Japan. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.

Laurie Edelstein . 1998. “An Accusation Easily to Be Made? Rape and Malicious Prosecution in Eighteenth-Century England.American Journal of Legal History 42 (4): 351–90.

Elizabeth Kolsky . 2010. “‘The Body Evidencing the Crime’: Rape on Trial in Colonial India, 1860–1947.Gender & History 22 (1): 109–30.

Tanika Sarkar . 2000. “A Prehistory of Rights: The Age of Consent Debate in Colonial Bengal.Feminist Studies 26 (3): 601–22.

Radhika Singha . 1996. “Making the Domestic More Domestic: Criminal Law and the ‘Head of the Household,’ 1772–1843.” Indian Economic and Social History Review 33 (3): 309–44.

Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak . 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, eds. Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg , 271313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Asian Studies
  • ISSN: 0021-9118
  • EISSN: 1752-0401
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-asian-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×