Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Taiwan's State and Social Movements Under the DPP Government, 2000–2004

  • Ming-sho Ho
Abstract

This article explores the evolution of social movement politics under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government (2000–2004) by using the perspective of political opportunity structure. Recent “contentious politics” in Taiwan is analyzed in terms of four changing dimensions of the opportunity structure. First, the DPP government opens some policy channels, and social movement activists are given chances to work within the institution. Yet other features of the political landscape are less favorable to movement activists. Incumbent elites' political orientation shifts. As the economic recession sets in, there is a conservative policy turn. Political instability incurs widespread countermoblization to limit reform. Last, the Pan-Blue camp, now in opposition, devises its own social movement strategy. Some social movement issues gain political salience as a consequence of the intervention of the opposition parties, but its excessive opportunism also encourages the revolt of antireform forces. As a result of these countervailing factors, social movements have made only limited gains from the recent turnover of power.

Copyright
References
Hide All

Notes

This study is in part supported by Taiwan's National Science Council (NSC93-2413-H-343-007-FG). I would like to thank Stephan Haggard, Tieh-chih Chang, and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

1. Hsiao, Michael Hsin-huang, “Emerging Social Movements and the Rise of a Demanding Civil Society in Taiwan,” Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 24 (1990): 163179.

3. Rucht, David, “The Strategies and Action Repertoires of New Movements.” In Dalton, Russell J. and Kuechler, Manfred, eds., Challenging the Political Order: New Social and Political Movements in Western Democracies (Oxford: Polity Press, 1990), pp. 156175.

4. Einsinger, Peter K., “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities,” American Political Science Review 67, No. 1 1973): 1128.

5. Tarrow, Sidney, Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy 1965–1975 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).

6. McAdam, Doug, Political Process and Development of Black Insurgency 1930–1970 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).

7. McAdam, Doug, “Conceptual Origins, Problems, Future Directions.” In McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer, eds., Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 2629.

8. Marks, Gary and McAdam, Doug, “On the Relationship of Political Opportunity Structure to the Form of Collective Action: The Case of the European Union.” In della Porta, Donatella et al., eds., Social Movements in a Globalizing World (London: Macmillan, 1999), p. 99; Tarrow, Sidney, “States and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements.” In McAdam, McCarthy, and Zald, , Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, pp. 41–61.

9. Kitschelt, Herbert, “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies,” British Journal of Political Science 16 (1986): 5785.

10. Kriesi, Hanspeter et al., New Social Movements in Western Europe (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995), pp. 3334.

11. Tarrow, Sidney G., Power in Movement, 2nd ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 87.

12. Piven, Frances Fox and Cloward, Richard, Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail (New York: Vintage Books, 1977).

13. Goodwin, Jeff and Jasper, James M., “Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory,” Sociological Forum 14 (1999): 2755.

14. Gamson, William A. and Meyer, David S., “Framing Political Opportunity.” In McAdam, , McCarthy, , and Zald, , Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, p. 283.

15. Chang, Mau-kuei et al., Minkuo ch'ishih nientai taiwan tich'u tzulichiuchi shihchien chih yenchiu [A study on Taiwan's “self-help” actions in the 1980s] (Taipei: Research, Evaluation, Development Commission of Executive Yuan, 1992), p. 26.

16. Reardon-Anderson, James, Pollution, Politics, and Foreign Investment in Taiwan: The Lukang Rebellion (Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1992).

17. Chang, Mau-kuei, Shehui yüntung yü chengchih chuanhua [Social movement and political transition] (Taipei: Institute of National Policy Research, 1989).

18. Chu, Yun-han, Crafting Democracy in Taiwan (Taipei: Institute of National Policy Research, 1992); Wu, Jie-min, Fantui yüntung yü shehui k'angyi te hutung“ [The interaction of opposition movement and social protests], Chungkuo Lunt'an [China Tribune] 335 (1989): 29–40.

19. Tarrow, , Power in Movement, pp. 9699.

20. Hsieh, Frank Chang-ting, Sheyünpu tutao ch'uangwei hsiehch'uangt'ing paokaoshu“ [Report of supervisor of Department of Social Movement], Hsintaits ungshu [New Taiwan Series] 36 (1987): 1221.

21. Chiu, Yi-jen and Yeh, Li-ssu, Fanliuch'in, fanhossu, fantuts' ai: hsinch' aoliu te kungtsomupiao” [Against sixth naphtha cracker and fourth nuclear power plant: The short-term goal of New Tide], Hsinch' aoli [New Tide] 18 (1991): 47.

22. Kuo, Cheng-liang, Minchintang chuahsing chih t'ung [The pains of DPP's transition] (Taipei: T'ienhsia, 1998).

23. China Times, May 29, 1993, p. 3. For the DPP's calculative instrumentalism, see Jie-min Wu, “Chiehch'u k'olaosaiweitz'u te mochou: Fenhsi tangch'ien shehui kaiko yüntung te k'unching“ [Disenchanting of Clausewitz's charm: The tactical dilemma of Taiwan's reform social movements], Taiwanese Sociology 4 (2002): 159–198.

24. Fan, Yun, Lienchieh yüntung yu pientung te chengchih chihuichiengo“ [Linking activists to the changing political opportunity structure]. In Chang, Mau-kuei and Cheng, Yung-nien, Liangan shehui yüntung fanhsi [Social movements on both sides of Taiwan straits] (Taipei: Shihtzujanchuyi, 2003) pp. 137173.

25. In 1987, a moderate center-left Worker's Party was formed, and one year later, its left-wing faction walked out and built a Labor Party. Both failed to meet the electoral challenge and remained organizationally minuscule and politically invisible. Labor activists continued to embrace the idea of organizing a left-wing party, but a bona fide effort was not forthcoming. As late as 1998, as the independent unions joined together to form a new national federation, the idea of a new party was again brought into the agenda.

26. Though environmentalists did form a green party in 1996, it failed as a viable political alternative. See Ho, Ming-sho, “The Politics of Anti-nuclear Protest in Taiwan: A Case of Party-Dependent Movement (1980–2000),” Modern Asian Studies 37, No. 3 2003): 701706.

27. Hsung, Ray-May and Chi, Chin-Shan, Shihtzup'eiyüfa hsingch'eng te chengch'e fanch' ou yinghsiangli chichih“ [The influence mechanism of policy domain in the teacher education law], Taiwanese Sociology 4 (2002): 199246.

28. Chen, Li-ju, T'aiwan chiaoshih jench'üan yüntung te hsingch'i yü chengch'e yinghsiang [The rise and policy impact of Taiwan's schoolteachers movement], (Nanhua University, Chiayi, Taiwan, 2004).

29. Ho, Ming-sho, “Contested Governance between Politics and Professionalism in Taiwan,” Journal of Contemporary Asia 34, No. 2 2004): 238253.

30. Such was the case of Wu Li-feng, general secretary of Humanistic Education Foundation. She had been active in the education reform movement for a decade before she was invited to the position of privy secretary to the minister of education in May 2000. She worked in the Ministry of Education for one and a half years. During her tenure, she was very instrumental in pushing through the curriculum reform. After her tenure, she went back to work in the original education reform organization. Interview, February 13, 2004.

31. Interview with Hsu Chiung-tan, assistant to the Environmental Protection Administration director, December 21, 2001.

32. Interview with Yu-cheng, Hong, assistant to the Society for Promoting Sustainable Development, December 21, 2001.

33. Ho, Ming-sho, “Weakened State and Social Movement: The Paradox of Taiwanese Environmental Politics After the Power Transfer,” Journal of Contemporary China 14 (2005): 339352.

34. China Times, April 8, 2001, p. 5.

35. Fu, Chien-wen, Ts'ung ts'aiwu laiyüan k'an NGO te tzuchuhsing“ [NGO's autonomy: A perspective of financing sources], E-south paper (September 6, 2002). See the website http://tw.egroups.com/group/esouth-community (accessed November 2, 2004).

36. Chu, Yu-bin, “Don't Sacrifice the Civil Society for Political Reconciliation.” China Times, January 7, 2005, p. 15.

37. Interview with Chung-hong, Lin, former secretary of communication, Taiwan Confederation of Trade Unions, January 31, 2004.

38. Solinger, Dorothy J., “Ending One-party Dominance: Korea, Taiwan, Mexico,” Journal of Democracy 12, No. 1 2001): 36.

39. For example, during the 1996 presidential election, one labor union leader published an article in which he asked candidates to address the question of “prevalent black gold and growing gap between the rich and the poor.” China Times, March 8, 1996, p. 15.

40. See Huang's, Chang-ling analysis, “The Politics of Reregulation: Globalization, Democratization, and Taiwanese Labor Movement,” Developing Economies 40, No. 3 2002): 305326.

41. Ho, , “Weakened State and Social Movement.

42. China Times, May 17, 2002, p. 3.

43. United Daily, May 31, 2004, p. 3.

44. Rigger, Shelley, “Taiwan in 2002: Another Year of Political Droughts and Typhoons,” Asian Survey 43, No. 1 2002): 4148.

45. China Times, November 18, 1993.

46. Central Daily, December 21, 1993.

47. China Times, September 19, 2003, p. C1.

48. See http://www.president.gov.tw/1_epaper/92/920710.html (accessed February 10, 2004).

49. See http://www.president.gov.tw/1_epaper/92/920717.html (accessed February 10, 2004).

50. United Daily, June 17, 2004, p. 6.

51. United Daily, June 20, 2004, p. 2.

52. Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row, 1957).

53. China Times, February 12, 2001, p. 2.

54. For the detailed minutes of these conferences, see the website of the National Policy Foundation, http://www.npf.org.tw/main.htm (accessed November 7, 2004).

55. China Times, June 19, 2003, p. A2.

56. United Daily, August 30, 2003, p. 11.

57. China Times, June 19, 2003, p. A2.

58. China Evening Post, September 12, 2003, p. 2.

59. China Evening Post, May 3, 2002, p. 2.

60. Both sides' explanation regarding this unhappy incident can be found in E-south paper, July 29–30, 2003, available at http://tw.egroups.com/group/esouth-community (accessed November 1, 2004).

61. Diamond, Larry, “Toward Democratic Consolidation.” In Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F., eds., The Global Resurgence of Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996), p. 227.

62. Tilly, Charles, Stories, Identities and Political Changes (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002), p. 194.

63. Schmitter, Phillippe C., “The Consolidation of Democracy and Representation of Social Groups,” American Behavioral Scientist 36 (1992): 430436.

64. Reinhelt, Claire, “Moving onto the Terrain of State: The Battered Women's Movement and the Politics of Engagement.” In Ferree, Myra Marx and Martin, Patricia Yancey, eds., Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women's Movement (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1995), p. 85.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of East Asian Studies
  • ISSN: 1598-2408
  • EISSN: 2234-6643
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-east-asian-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed