Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T03:10:40.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inventive Activity in the British Textile Industry, 1700–1800

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Trevor Griffiths ,
Philip A. Hunt  and
Patrick K. O'Brien
Trevor Griffiths
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Oxford OX1 3BH
Philip A. Hunt
Affiliation:
Research Assistant at the Institute of Historical Research, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU
Patrick K. O'Brien
Affiliation:
Director of the Institute of Historical Research, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An analysis of innovations in the eighteenth-century British textile industry is the basis for an evaluation of aggregate studies of invention during the Industrial Revolution, derived from patent evidence alone. Disaggregation of the data challenges recent generalizations concerning the pace and pattern of technical change over the period. Discontinuities in the nature of invention, promoting an acceleration in total factor productivity growth, are traced to the 1790s. Prior to that date, industrial development conformed to a pattern of Smithian growth, as manufacturers diversified their output in response to an expanding domestic market for consumer goods.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 881 - 906
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, John N., “Intellectual Property Cases in Lord Mansfield's Court Notebooks,” Journal of Legal History, 8 (05 1987), pp. 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, John N., and Averley, Gwen, “The Patent Specification: The Role of Liardet v. Johnson,” Journal of Legal History, 7 (09 1986), pp. 156–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, David G. C., “The Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce: Organization, Membership and Objectives in the First Three Decades, 1755–84: An Example of Voluntary Economic and Social Policy in the Eighteenth Century” (Ph.D. diss., University of London, 1979).Google Scholar
Allan, David G. C., William Shipley: Founder of the Royal Society of Arts (London, 1979).Google Scholar
Apletre, John [and Barham, Henry], The Produce of India, Italy, and France, Raised in England, by the Silk Manufactures (London, 1720).Google Scholar
A Register of the Premiums and Bounties Given by the Society Instituted at London for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, from the Original Institution in the Year 1754, to the Year 1776 Inclusive (London, 1778).Google Scholar
Ashton, Thomas S., “Some Statistics of the Industrial Revolution,” The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 16 (05 1948), pp. 214–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspin, Christopher, “New Evidence on James Hargreaves and the Spinning Jenny,” Textile History, 1 (1968), pp. 119–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axon, William E. A., ed., The Annals of Manchester (Manchester, 1886).Google Scholar
Baines, Edward Jr., History of the Cotton Manufacture in Great Britain (London, 1835).Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine, The Age of Manufactures (London, 1985).Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine, “Markets, Trade and European Manufacture,” in Berg, Maxine, ed., Markets and Manufactures in Early Industrial Europe (London, 1991), pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Bremner, David, The Industries of Scotland: Their Rise, Progress and Present Condition (Edinburgh, 1869).Google Scholar
Broadbridge, Seymour R., ed., “British Industry in 1767: Extracts from a Travel Journal of Joseph Banks,” in A. Rupert Hall and Norman Smith, eds., History of Technology (1980), vol. 5, pp. 119–42.Google Scholar
Chapman, Stanley D., “The Pioneers of Worsted Spinning by Power,” Business History, 7 (07 1965), pp. 87–116.Google Scholar
Chapman, Stanley D., “Enterprise and Innovation in the British Hosiery Industry, 1750–1850,” Textile History, 5 (1974), pp. 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Stanley D., and Chassagne, Serge, European Textile Printers in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1981).Google Scholar
Coleman, Donald C., “An Innovation and Its Diffusion: The ‘New Draperies,’” Economic History Review, 2nd series 22 (12 1969), pp. 417–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Donald C., “Textile Growth,” in Harte, Negley B. and Ponting, Kenneth G., eds., Textile History and Economic History: Essays in Honour of Miss Julia de Lacy Mann (Manchester, 1973), pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Comanor, William S., and Scherer, Frank M., “Patent Statistics As a Measure of Technical Change,” Journal of Political Economy, 77 (05/06 1969), pp. 392–98.Google Scholar
Cornish, William R., Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trademarks and Allied Rights (London, 1981).Google Scholar
Crafts, Nicholas F. R., “British Economic Growth, 1700–1831: A Review of the Evidence,” Economic History Review, 2nd series 36 (05 1983), pp. 177–99.Google Scholar
Crafts, Nicholas F. R., British Economic Growth during the Industrial Revolution (Oxford, 1985).Google Scholar
Crafts, Nicholas F. R., “Entrepreneurship and a Probabilistic View of the British Industrial Revolution: Reply,” in Mokyr, Joel, ed., The Economics of the Industrial Revolution (London, 1985), pp. 135–36.Google Scholar
Crompton, Samuel, “Petition ‘To the Merchants, Manufacturers, Spiners [sic], Printers & c. Engaged in the Cotton Trade in the United Kingdom,’ April 22, 1811,” Crompton Papers, Bolton Reference Library, ZCR/1/12b.Google Scholar
Deane, Phyllis, The First Industrial Revolution (Cambridge, 1965).Google Scholar
Deny, Thomas K., and Williams, Trevor I., A Short History of Technology (London, 1960).Google Scholar
Doran, Edward, To the Honourable Knights, Citizens and Burgesses in Parliament Assembled, the Humble Petition of Edward Doran, of the City of Dublin, Silk Dyer (Dublin?, 1760).Google Scholar
Durie, Alastair J., “The Fine Linen Industry in Scotland, 1707–1822,” Textile History, 7 (1976), pp. 173–85.Google Scholar
Durie, Alastair J., The Scottish Linen Industry in the Eighteenth Century (Edinburgh, 1979).Google Scholar
Dutton, Harold I., The Patent System and Inventive Activity during the Industrial Revolution, 1750–1852 (Manchester, 1984).Google Scholar
Edwards, Michael M., The Growth of the British Cotton Trade, 1780–1815 (Manchester, 1967).Google Scholar
Eversley, David E. C., “The Home Market and Economic Growth in England, 1750–80,” in Jones, Eric L. and Mingay, Gordon E., eds., Land, Labour and Population in the Industrial Revolution (London, 1967), pp. 206–59.Google Scholar
Felkin, William, History of the Machine-Wrought Hosiery and Lace Manufactures (Newton Abbot, 1967 reprint).Google Scholar
Fine, Ben, and Leopold, Ellen, “Consumerism and the Industrial Revolution,” Social History, 15 (05 1990), pp. 151–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitton, Robert S., The Arkwrights: Spinners of Fortune (Manchester, 1989).Google Scholar
Floud, Peter C., “The English Contribution to the Development of Copper-Plate Printing,” Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists, 76 (07 1960), pp. 425–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floud, Peter C., “The English Contribution to the Chemistry of Calico Printing before Perkin,” Ciba Review (1961, no. 1), pp. 8–14.Google Scholar
Gauldie, Enid, “Water–Powered Beetling Machines,” Transactions of the Newcomen Society, 39 (1966–1967), pp. 125–28.Google Scholar
The Gentleman's Magazine, vols. 1–70 (1731–1800).Google Scholar
George, Dorothy M., London Life in the Eighteenth Century (Harmondsworth edn., 1966).Google Scholar
Gilboy, Elizabeth W., “Demand As a Factor in the Industrial Revolution,” in Hartwell, R. Max, ed., The Causes of the Industrial Revolution in England (London, 1967), pp. 121–38.Google Scholar
Gill, Conrad, The Rise of the Irish Linen Industry (Oxford, 1925).Google Scholar
Gittins, Lawrence, “Innovations in Textile Bleaching in Britain in the Eighteenth Century,” Business History Review, 53 (Summer 1979), pp. 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomme, Allan A., Patents of Invention: Origin and Growth of the Patent System in Britain (London, 1946).Google Scholar
Gribbon, H. D., “The Irish Linen Board, 1711–1828,” in Cullen, Louis M. and Smout, T. Christopher, eds., Comparative Aspects of Scottish and Irish Economic and Social History, 1600–1900 (Edinburgh, 1977), pp. 77–87.Google Scholar
Guest, Richard, The British Cotton Manufactures, and a Reply to an Article on the Spinning Machinery Contained in a Recent Number of the Edinburgh Review (Manchester, 1828).Google Scholar
Guest, Richard, A Compendious History of the Cotton Manufacture. With a Disproval of the Claim of Sir Richard Arkwright to the Invention of Its Ingenious Machinery (Manchester, 1823).Google Scholar
Hamilton, Henry, The Industrial Revolution in Scotland (London, 1966).Google Scholar
Hayward, Peter A., Hayward's Patent Cases, 1600–1883: A Compilation of the English Patent Cases for Those Years, 11 vols. (Abingdon, 1987), vol. 1, pp. 222–311.Google Scholar
Hellot, Jean, The Art of Dying Wool and Woollen Stuffs (Dublin edn., 1767).Google Scholar
Henderson, William O., Britain and Industrial Europe, 1750–1870 (Leicester, 1972).Google Scholar
Henson, Gravenor, History of the Framework Knitters (Newton Abbot, 1970 reprint).Google Scholar
Hertz, Gerald B., “The English Silk Industry in the Eighteenth Century,” English Historical Review, 24 (10 1909), pp. 710–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Sydney H., A History of Bleaching (London, 1924).Google Scholar
Hill, Bridget, Eighteenth-Century Women: An Anthology (London, 1984).Google Scholar
Hill, Georgina, A History of English Dress from the Saxon Period to the Present Day, 2 vols. (London, 1893).Google Scholar
Humphries, Andrew B., Twelve Bobbins Spinning: The Story Surrounding a Horizontal, Flax Wheel Invented by Bernard Barton c. 1766 (Ivegill, 1983).Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Terence W., Before Adam Smith: The Emergence of Political Economy (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
Inikori, Joseph E., “Slavery and the Revolution in Cotton Textile Production in England,” Social Science History, 14 (1990), pp. 343–79.Google Scholar
James, John, History of the Worsted Manufacture in England (London, 1857).Google Scholar
John, Arthur H., “Agricultural Productivity and Economic Growth in England, 1700–60,” this Journal, 25 (03 1965), pp. 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Journals of the House of Commons, vols. 13–55 (1700–1800).Google Scholar
Kelly, Francis M., and Schwabe, Randolph, Historic Costume: A Chronicle of Fashion in Western Europe, 1490–1790 (2nd edn., London, 1929).Google Scholar
Kennedy, John, A Brief Memoir of Samuel Grampian: With a Description of His Machine Called the Mule and of the Subsequent Improvement of the Machine by Others (Manchester, 1830).Google Scholar
Kerridge, Eric, Textile Manufactures in Early Modern England (Manchester, 1985).Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon, “Inventive Activity: Problems of Definition and Measurement” in National Bureau of Economic Research, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton, 1962), pp. 19–43.Google Scholar
Langford, Paul, A Polite and Commercial People: England, 1727–1783 (Oxford, 1989).Google Scholar
Lemire, Beverley M., “Developing Consumerism and the Ready-made Clothing Trade in Britain, 1750–1800,” Textile History, 15 (1984), pp. 21–44.Google Scholar
Lemire, Beverley M., “The British Cotton Industry and the Domestic Market: Trade and Fashion in an Early Industrial Society, 1750–1800” (D.Phil, diss., University of Oxford, 1984).Google Scholar
Lipson, Ephraim, The History of the Woollen and Worsted Industries (London, 1965 reprint).Google Scholar
Longfield, Ada K., “History of the Irish Linen and Cotton Printing Industry in the 18th Century,” Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland, 67 (1937), pp. 26–56.Google Scholar
McKendrick, Neil, Brewer, John, and Plumb, John H., The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England (London, 1982).Google Scholar
MacLeod, Christine, Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The English Patent System, 1660–1800 (Cambridge, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Christine, “The 1690s Patent Boom: Invention or Stock-jobbing?,” Economic History Review, 2nd series 39 (11 1986), pp. 549–71.Google Scholar
Macquer, Pierre J., Art de la Teinture en Soie (Academie des Sciences, Paris, 1763).Google Scholar
Manchester Magazine (1743–1748).Google Scholar
Marsden, Richard, Cotton Weaving: Its Development, Principles, and Practice (London, 1895).Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel, “Demand vs. Supply in the Industrial Revolution,” this Journal, 37 (12 1977), pp. 981–1008.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel, The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress (Oxford, 1990).Google Scholar
Montgomery, Florence M., “English Textile Swatches of the Mid-Eighteenth Century,” The Burlington Magazine, 102 (06 1960), pp. 240–43.Google Scholar
Mukerji, Chandra, From Graven Images: Patterns of Modern Materialism (New York, 1983).Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R., “Introduction,” in National Bureau of Economic Research, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton, 1962), pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Albert, “Lieutenant John Holker,” Transactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Antiquarian Society, 9 (1891), pp. 147–54.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Patrick K., “Agriculture and the Home Market for English Industry, 1660–1820,” English Historical Review, 100 (10 1985), pp. 773–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Patrick K., “The Mainsprings of Technological Progress in Western Europe, 1750–1850,” in Mathias, Peter and Davis, John A., eds., Innovation and Technology in Europe from the Eighteenth Century to the Present Day (Oxford, 1991), pp. 6–17.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Patrick K., and Engerman, Stanley L., “Exports and the Growth of the British Economy from the Glorious Revolution to the Peace of Amiens,” in Solow, Barbara, ed., Slavery and the Rise of the Atlantic System (Cambridge, 1991), pp. 177–210.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Patrick K., Griffiths, Trevor, and Hunt, Philip A., “Political Components of the Industrial Revolution: Parliament and the English Cotton Textile Industry, 1660–1774,” Economic History Review, 2nd series 44 (08 1991), pp. 395–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, James, A Description of Manchester by a Native of the Town (Manchester, 1783).Google Scholar
Plan by the Commissioners and Trustees for Improving Fisheries and Manufactures in Scotland, for the Application of Their Funds (Edinburgh, 1727).Google Scholar
Plant, Arnold, “The Economic Theory Concerning Patents for Invention,” Economica, new series 1 (02 1934), pp. 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Premiums for Inventions in Mechanicks,” Transactions of the Society, Instituted at London, for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, 1 (1783), pp. 217–18.Google Scholar
Randall, Adrian J., “The Shearmen and the Wiltshire Outrages of 1802: Trade Unionism and Industrial Violence,” Social History, 7 (10 1982), pp. 283–304.Google Scholar
Remond, Andre, John Holker, manufacturier et grand fonctionnaire en France au XVIIIme siècle, 1719–86 (Paris, 1946).Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Aileen, A Visual History of Costume: The Eighteenth Century (London, 1983).Google Scholar
Roehl, Richard, “French Industrialization: A Reconsideration,” Explorations in Economic History, 2nd series 13 (07 1976), pp. 233–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Alan, “Rural Industries and Social Structure: The Framework Knitting Industry of South Nottinghamshire, 1670–1840,” Textile History, 12 (1981), pp. 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Michael E., “Samuel Crompton (1753–1827), Inventor of the Spinning Mule: A Reconsideration,” Transactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Antiquarian Society, 75–76, (1965–1966), pp. 11–32.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan, Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
Royal Society of Arts, Ad Hoc Committee Minutes, 1758–1760.Google Scholar
Royal Society of Arts, “An Historical Register of the Transactions of the Society Instituted at London for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce” (Dr. Templeman's Transactions, ca. 1760–1761).Google Scholar
Royal Society of Arts, Subject Index to Society Minutes, 1754–1850.Google Scholar
Royal Society of Arts, Minutes, 1754–1800.Google Scholar
Royal Society of Arts, Minutes of Standing Premium Committees, 1760–1800.Google Scholar
Royal Society of London, Philosophical Transactions, vols. 22–90 (1700–1800).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Gerry R., and Sugarman, David, “Introduction: Towards a New History of Law and Material Society, 1750–1914,” in Rubin, Gerry R. and Sugarman, David, eds., Law, Economy and Society, 1750–1914: Essays in the History of English Law (Abingdon, 1984), pp. 1–123.Google Scholar
Sanders, Barkev S., “Some Difficulties in Measuring Inventive Activity,” in National Bureau of Economic Research, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton, 1962), pp. 53–77.Google Scholar
Saville, Richard V., “Some Aspects of the Role of Government in the Industrial Development of England, 1686–1720” (Ph.D. diss., University of Sheffield, 1979), pp. 422–33.Google Scholar
Schachar, Ari Y. Ben, “Demand vs. Supply in the Industrial Revolution: A Comment,” this Journal, 44 (09 1984), pp. 801–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, G., “The History of Turkey Red Dyeing,” Ciba Review, no. 39 (05 1941), pp. 1407–16.Google Scholar
Schmookler, Jacob, “Comment on Barkev S. Sanders, ‘Some Difficulties in Measuring Inventive Activity,’” in National Bureau of Economic Research, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton, 1962), pp. 78–83.Google Scholar
Schmookler, Jacob, Invention and Economic Growth (Harvard, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Elizabeth B., English Overseas Trade Statistics, 1697–1808 (Oxford, 1960).Google Scholar
Shammas, Carole, The Pre-Industrial Consumer in England and America (Oxford, 1990).Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L., “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence from Patent Records, 1790–1846,” this Journal, 48 (12 1988), pp. 813–50.Google Scholar
Strickland, Mary, A Memoir of the Life, Writings and Mechanical Inventions of Edmund Cartwright, D.D., F.R.S. (London, 1843).Google Scholar
Sullivan, Richard J., “England's ‘Age of Invention’: The Acceleration of Patents and Patentable Invention during the Industrial Revolution,” Explorations in Economic History, 26 (10 1989), pp. 424–52.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Richard J., “The Revolution of Ideas: Widespread Patenting and Invention During the English Industrial Revolution,” this Journal, 50 (06 1990), pp. 349–62.Google Scholar
“The Royal Society of Arts,” The Burlington Magazine, 96 (05 1954), pp. 133–34.Google Scholar
The Trial of a Cause Instituted by Richard Pepper Ardern, Esq., His Majesty's Attorney General, by Writ ofScire Facias, to Repeal a Patent Granted on the Sixteenth of December 1775, to Mr Richard Arkwright (London, 1785).Google Scholar
Turner, Thomas, New Methods of Improving Flax and Flax Seed and Bleaching Cloth (Dublin, 1715).Google Scholar
Wadsworth, Alfred P., and Mann, Julia de Lacy, The Cotton Trade and Industrial Lancashire, 1600–1780 (Manchester, 1931).Google Scholar
Waller, John, An Appeal to the Nobility and Gentry in Regard to Gold and Silver Lace, Brocades, Embroidery and Gold and Silver Ribbon (London, 1755).Google Scholar
Warden, Alexander J., The Linen Trade, Ancient and Modern (London, 1864).Google Scholar
Warner, Sir Frank, The Silk Industry of the United Kingdom: Its Origin and Development (London, 1921).Google Scholar
Weatherill, Lorna, Consumer Behaviour and Material Culture in Britain, 1660–1760 (London, 1988).Google Scholar
Wescher, H., “John Holker, a Promoter of the French Textile Industry,” Ciba Review, 12, no. 135 (12 1959), pp. 10–13.Google Scholar
Wescher, H., “Turkey Red Dyeing,” Ciba Review, 12, no. 135 (12 1959), pp. 21–26.Google Scholar
White, George, A Practical Treatise on Weaving, by Hand and Power Looms (Manchester, 1851).Google Scholar
Wilson, John, An Essay on Light and Colours, and What Colouring Matters Are That Dye Cotton and Linen (Manchester, 1786).Google Scholar
Woodcroft, Bennet, ed., Titles of Patents of Invention, Chronologically Arranged from March 2, 1617 (14 James 1) to Oct. 1, 1852 (16 Victoriae) (London, 1854).Google Scholar
Woodcroft, Bennet, ed., Patents for Invention, Abridgements of Specifications Relating to Bleaching, Dyeing, and Printing Calico and other Fabrics, and Yarns (London, 1859).Google Scholar
Woodcroft, Bennet, ed., Patents for Invention, Abridgement of Specifications Relating to Weaving (London, 1861).Google Scholar
Woodcroft, Bennet, ed., Patents for Invention, Abridgements of Specifications Relating to Lace, and other Looped and Netted Fabrics (London, 1866).Google Scholar
Woodcroft, Bennet, ed., Patents for Invention, Abridgements of Specifications Relating to Acids, Alkalies, Oxides, and Salts (London, 1869).Google Scholar
Yarwood, Doreen, English Costume from the Second Century B.C. to 1952, with Introductory Chapters on the Ancient Civilisations (London, 1952).Google Scholar