Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Looks and Sounds Like a Winner: Perceptions of Competence in Candidates’ Faces and Voices Influences Vote Choice

  • Casey A. Klofstad (a1)
Abstract

Voters are more likely to support candidates whose faces and voices are perceived as competent. However, what is the simultaneous influence of these two characteristics? Here this question is examined with an observational study and an experiment. In the observational study, subjects rated the facial competence of Members of the U.S. House of Representatives. The most and least competent faces identified were paired with recordings of competent (i.e., lower pitched) and incompetent (i.e., higher pitched) voices to create simulated candidates. For the experiment, a separate set of subjects voted between randomly generated pairs of these simulated candidates. The results show that candidates with competent faces or competent voices won more votes, but the influence of facial competence was nearly three times that of vocal competence.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Abend, Peter, Pflüger, Lena S., Koppensteiner, Markus, Coquerelle, Michael, and Grammer, Karl. 2015The Sound of Female Shape: A Redundant Signal of Vocal and Facial Attractiveness.” Evolution and Human Behavior 36: 174181.
Anderson, Rindy C., and Klofstad, Casey A., 2012. “Preference for Leaders with Masculine Voices Holds in the Case of Feminine Leadership Roles.” PLoS One 7: e51216.
Antonakis, John, and Dalgas, Olaf. 2009. “Predicting Elections: Child's Play! Science 323: 1183.
Atkinson, Matthew D., Enos, Ryan D., and Hill, Seth J.. 2009. “Candidate Faces and Election Outcomes: Is the Face-Vote Correlation Caused by Candidate Selection? Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4: 229249.
Ballew, Charles C. II, and Todorov, Alexander. 2007. “Predicting Political Elections from Rapid and Unreflective Face Judgments.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 1794817953.
Berggren, Niclas, Jordahl, Henrik, and Poutvaara, Panu. 2010. “The Looks of a Winner: Beauty and Electoral Success.” Journal of Public Economics 94: 815.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Carpinella, Colleen M., Hehman, Eric, Freeman, Jonathan B., and Johnson, Kerri L.. 2016. “The Gendered Face of Politics: Consequences of Facial Sex Typicality for Vote Choice.” Political Communication 33: 2138
Chen, Fang Fang, Jing, Yiming, and Min Lee, Jeong. 2014. “The Looks of a Leader: Competent and Trustworthy, But Not Dominant.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 51: 2733.
Chiao, Joan Y., Bowman, Nicholas E., and Gill, Harleen. 2008. “The Political Gender Gap: Gender Bias in Facial Inferences that Predict Voting Behavior.” PLoS One e3666.
Efran, Michael G., and Patterson, E. W. J..1974. “Voters Vote Beautiful: The Effect of Physical Appearance on a National Election.” Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 6: 352356.
Feinberg, David R., Jones, Benedict C., Little, Anthony C., Burt, Doreen Michael T., and Perrett, David I. 2005a. “Manipulations of Fundamental and Formant Frequencies Influence the Attractiveness of Human Male Voices.” Animal Behaviour 69: 561568.
Feinberg, David R., Jones, Benedict C., DeBruine, Lisa M., Moore, Fhionna R., Law Smith, Miriam J., Elisabeth Cornwell, R., Tiddemand, Bernard P., Boothroyd, Lynda G., and Perrett, David I.. 2005b. “The Voice and Face of Woman: One Ornament that Signals Quality?Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 398408.
Fink, Bernhard, Neave, Nick, and Seydel, Hanna. 2007. “Male Facial Appearance Signals Physical Strength to Women.” American Journal of Human Biology 19: 8287.
Grammer, Karl, and Thornhill, Randy. 1994. “Human (Homo sapiens) Facial Attractiveness and Sexual Selection: The Role of Symmetry and Averageness.” Journal of Comparative Psychology 108: 233242.
Gregory, Stanford W. and Gallagher, Timothy J.. 2002. “Spectral Analysis of Candidates' Nonverbal Vocal Communication: Predicting U.S. Presidential Election Outcomes.” Social Psychology Quarterly 65: 298308.
Hamermersh, Daniel S. and Biddle, Jeff E.. 2001. “Beauty and the Labor Market.” American Economic Review 84: 11741194.
Jones Benedict, C., Feinberg, David R., DeBruine, Lisa M., Little, Anthony C., and Vukovic, Jovana. 2010. “A Domain-Specific Opposite-Sex Bias in Human Preferences for Manipulated Voice Pitch.” Animal Behaviour 79: 5762.
Keating, Caroline F., Randall, David, and Kendrick, Timothy. 1999. “Presidential Physiognomies: Altered Images, Altered Perceptions.” Political Psychology 20: 593609.
King, Amy and Leigh, Andrew. 2009. “Beautiful Politicians.” Kyklos 62: 579593.
Klofstad, Casey A. 2016. Candidate voice pitch influences election outcomes. Political Psychology 37: 725738.
Klofstad, Casey A., Anderson, Rindy C., and Nowicki, Stephen. 2015. “Perceptions of Competence, Strength, and Age Influence Voters to Select Leaders with Lower-Pitched Voices.” PLoS One 10: e0133779.
Klofstad, Casey A., Anderson, Rindy C., and Peters, Susan. 2012. “Sounds Like a Winner: Voice Pitch Influences Perception of Leadership Capacity in Both Men and Women.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 297: 26982704.
Kroodsma, Donald E. 1990. “Using Appropriate Experimental-Designs for Intended Hypotheses in Song Playbacks, with Examples for Testing Effects of Song Repertoire Sizes.” Animal Behaviour 40: 11381150.
Laustsen, Lasse. 2014. “Decomposing the Relationship Between Candidates’ Facial Appearance and Electoral Success.” Political Behavior 36: 777791.
Laustsen, Lasse and Petersen, Michael Bang. 2016. “Winning Faces Vary by Ideology: How Nonverbal Source Cues Influence Election and Communication Success in Politics.” Political Communication 33: 188211.
Laustsen, Lasse, Peterson, Michael Bang, and Klofstad, Casey A.. 2015. “Vote Choice, Ideology, and Social Dominance Orientation Influence Preferences for Lower-Pitched Voices in Political Candidates.” Evolutionary Psychology 13: 113.
Little, Anthony C., Burriss, Robert P., Jones, Benedict C., and Craig Roberts, S.. 2007. “Facial Appearance Affects Voting Decisions.” Evolution and Human Behavior 28: 1827.
Lutz, Georg. 2010. “The Electoral Success of Beauties and Beasts.” Swiss Political Science Review 16: 457480.
Machlis, L, Dodd, P. W. D., and Fentress, J. C.. 1985. “The Pooling Fallacy—Problems Arising when Individuals Contribute More than One Observation to the Data Set.” Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 68: 201214.
Mattes, Kyle, & Milazzo, Caitlin. 2014. “Pretty Faces, Marginal Races: Predicting Election Outcomes Using Trait Assessments of British Parliamentary Candidates.” Electoral Studies 34: 177189.
Miyake, Kunitate and Zuckerman, Miron. 1993. “Beyond Personality Impressions: Effects of Physical and Vocal Attractiveness on False Consensus, Social Comparison, Affiliation, and Assumed and Perceived Similarity.” Journal of Personality 61: 411437.
O'Connor, Jillian J. M., Fraccaro, Paul J., Pisanski, Katarzyna, Tigue, Cara C., and Feinberg, David R.. 2013. “Men's Preference for Women's Femininity in Dynamic Cross-Modal Stimuli.” PLoS One 8: e69531.
Puts, David A., Apicella, Coren L., and Cárdenas, Rodrigo A.. 2012. “Masculine Voices Signal Men's Threat Potential in Forager and Industrial Societies.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279: 601609.
Puts David, A., Hodges, Carolyn R., Cárdenas, Rodrigo A., and Gaulin, Steven J. C.. 2007. “Men's voices as dominance signals: vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men.” Evolution and Human Behavior 28: 340344.
Rauschecker, Josef P. 2015Auditory and Visual Cortex of Primates: A Comparison of Two Sensory Systems.” Eurorpean Journal of Neuroscience 41: 579585.
Re, Daniel E., Dzhelyova, Milena, Holzleitner, Iris J., Tigue, Cara C., Feinberg, David R., and Perrett, David I.. 2012. “Apparent Height and Body Mass Index Influence Perceived Leadership Ability in Three-Dimensional Faces.” Perception 41: 14771485.
Rosar, Ulrich, Klein, Markus, and Beckers, Tilo. 2008. “The Frog Pond Beauty Contest: Physical Attractiveness and Electoral Success of the Constituency Candidates at the North Rhine-Westphalia State Election of 2005.” European Journal of Political Research 47: 6479.
Rosenberg, Shawn W., Bohan, Lisa, McCafferty, Patrick, and Harris, Kevin. 1986. “The Image and the Vote: The Effect of Candidate Presentation on Voter Preference.” American Journal of Political Science 30: 108127.
Rosenberg, Shawn W. and McCafferty, Patrick. 1987. “The Image and the Vote: Manipulating Voters’ Preferences.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 3147.
Rule, Nicholas O., Ambady, Nalini, Adams, Reginald B., Ozono, Hiroki, Nakashima, Satoshi, Yoshikawa, Sakiko, and Watabe, Motoki. 2010. “Polling the Face: Prediction and Consensus Across Cultures.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98: 115.
Sigelman, Lee, Sigelman, Carol K., and Fowler, Christopher. 1987. “A Bird of a Different Feather?: An Experimental Investigation of Physical Attractiveness and the Electability of Female Candidates.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 3243.
Spisak, Brian R., Dekker, Peter H., Krüger, Max, and Vugt, Mark van. 2012. “Warriors and Peacekeepers: Testing a Biosocial Implicit Leadership Hypothesis of Intergroup Relations Using Masculine and Feminine Faces.” PLoS One e30399.
Spisak, Brian R. 2012. “The General Age of Leadership: Older-Looking Presidential Candidates Win Elections During War.” PLoS One e36945.
Spisak, Brian R., Homan, Astrid C., Grabo, Allen, and Vugt, Mark van. 2011. “Facing the Situation: Testing a Biosocial Contingency Model of Leadership in Intergroup Relations Using Masculine and Feminine Faces.” Leadership Quarterly 23: 273280.
Surawski, Melissa K. and Ossoff, Elizabeth P., EP. 2006. “The Effects of Physical and Vocal Attractiveness on Impression Formation of Politicians.” Current Psychology 25: 1527.
Thornhill, Randy and Gangestad, Steven W.. 1999. “Facial Attractiveness.” Trends in Cognitive Science 12: 452460.
Tigue, Cara C., Borak, Diana J., O'Connor, Jilliam J.M., Schandl, Charles, and Feinberg, David R.. 2012. “Voice Pitch Influences Voting Behavior.” Evolution and Human Behavior 33: 210216
Alexander, Todorov, Mandisodza, Anesu N., Amir Goren, A, and Hall, Crystal C.. 2005Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes.” Science 308: 16231626.
U.S. Government Printing Office. 2013. “One Hundred Thirteenth Congress: Congressional Pictorial Directory. (gpo.gov), accessed December 16, 2015.
White, Andrew Edward, Kenrick, Douglad T., and Neuberg, Steven L.. 2013Beauty at the Ballot Box: Disease Threats Predict Preferences for Physically Attractive Leaders.” Psychological Science 24: 24292436.
Zuckerman, Miron, Kunitate, Miyake, and Hodgins, Holley S.. 1991. “Cross-Channel Effects of Vocal and Physical Attractiveness and their Implications for Interpersonal Perception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60: 545554.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Experimental Political Science
  • ISSN: 2052-2630
  • EISSN: 2052-2649
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-experimental-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 12

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 14

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 8

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 4

 Unknown (35 KB)
35 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 10

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 13

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 23

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 24

 Audio (71 KB)
71 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 25

 Unknown (12 KB)
12 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 1

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 19

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 6

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 21

 Word (85 KB)
85 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 7

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 20

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 16

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 5

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 18

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 9

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 3

 Unknown (3 KB)
3 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 15

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 17

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 22

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 11

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 2

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 27
Total number of PDF views: 158 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 511 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 6th November 2017 - 16th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.