Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Looks and Sounds Like a Winner: Perceptions of Competence in Candidates’ Faces and Voices Influences Vote Choice

  • Casey A. Klofstad (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Voters are more likely to support candidates whose faces and voices are perceived as competent. However, what is the simultaneous influence of these two characteristics? Here this question is examined with an observational study and an experiment. In the observational study, subjects rated the facial competence of Members of the U.S. House of Representatives. The most and least competent faces identified were paired with recordings of competent (i.e., lower pitched) and incompetent (i.e., higher pitched) voices to create simulated candidates. For the experiment, a separate set of subjects voted between randomly generated pairs of these simulated candidates. The results show that candidates with competent faces or competent voices won more votes, but the influence of facial competence was nearly three times that of vocal competence.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Abend Peter, Pflüger Lena S., Koppensteiner Markus, Coquerelle Michael, and Grammer Karl. 2015The Sound of Female Shape: A Redundant Signal of Vocal and Facial Attractiveness.” Evolution and Human Behavior 36: 174181.
Anderson Rindy C., and Klofstad Casey A., 2012. “Preference for Leaders with Masculine Voices Holds in the Case of Feminine Leadership Roles.” PLoS One 7: e51216.
Antonakis John, and Dalgas Olaf. 2009. “Predicting Elections: Child's Play! Science 323: 1183.
Atkinson Matthew D., Enos Ryan D., and Hill Seth J.. 2009. “Candidate Faces and Election Outcomes: Is the Face-Vote Correlation Caused by Candidate Selection? Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4: 229249.
Ballew Charles C. II, and Todorov Alexander. 2007. “Predicting Political Elections from Rapid and Unreflective Face Judgments.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 1794817953.
Berggren Niclas, Jordahl Henrik, and Poutvaara Panu. 2010. “The Looks of a Winner: Beauty and Electoral Success.” Journal of Public Economics 94: 815.
Campbell Angus, Converse Phillip, Miller Warren, and Stokes Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Carpinella Colleen M., Hehman Eric, Freeman Jonathan B., and Johnson Kerri L.. 2016. “The Gendered Face of Politics: Consequences of Facial Sex Typicality for Vote Choice.” Political Communication 33: 2138
Chen Fang Fang, Jing Yiming, and Min Lee Jeong. 2014. “The Looks of a Leader: Competent and Trustworthy, But Not Dominant.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 51: 2733.
Chiao Joan Y., Bowman Nicholas E., and Gill Harleen. 2008. “The Political Gender Gap: Gender Bias in Facial Inferences that Predict Voting Behavior.” PLoS One e3666.
Efran Michael G., and Patterson E. W. J..1974. “Voters Vote Beautiful: The Effect of Physical Appearance on a National Election.” Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 6: 352356.
Feinberg David R., Jones Benedict C., Little Anthony C., Burt Doreen Michael T., and Perrett David I. 2005a. “Manipulations of Fundamental and Formant Frequencies Influence the Attractiveness of Human Male Voices.” Animal Behaviour 69: 561568.
Feinberg David R., Jones Benedict C., DeBruine Lisa M., Moore Fhionna R., Law Smith Miriam J., Elisabeth Cornwell R., Tiddemand Bernard P., Boothroyd Lynda G., and Perrett David I.. 2005b. “The Voice and Face of Woman: One Ornament that Signals Quality?Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 398408.
Fink Bernhard, Neave Nick, and Seydel Hanna. 2007. “Male Facial Appearance Signals Physical Strength to Women.” American Journal of Human Biology 19: 8287.
Grammer Karl, and Thornhill Randy. 1994. “Human (Homo sapiens) Facial Attractiveness and Sexual Selection: The Role of Symmetry and Averageness.” Journal of Comparative Psychology 108: 233242.
Gregory Stanford W. and Gallagher Timothy J.. 2002. “Spectral Analysis of Candidates' Nonverbal Vocal Communication: Predicting U.S. Presidential Election Outcomes.” Social Psychology Quarterly 65: 298308.
Hamermersh Daniel S. and Biddle Jeff E.. 2001. “Beauty and the Labor Market.” American Economic Review 84: 11741194.
Jones Benedict C., Feinberg David R., DeBruine Lisa M., Little Anthony C., and Vukovic Jovana. 2010. “A Domain-Specific Opposite-Sex Bias in Human Preferences for Manipulated Voice Pitch.” Animal Behaviour 79: 5762.
Keating Caroline F., Randall David, and Kendrick Timothy. 1999. “Presidential Physiognomies: Altered Images, Altered Perceptions.” Political Psychology 20: 593609.
King Amy and Leigh Andrew. 2009. “Beautiful Politicians.” Kyklos 62: 579593.
Klofstad Casey A. 2016. Candidate voice pitch influences election outcomes. Political Psychology 37: 725738.
Klofstad Casey A., Anderson Rindy C., and Nowicki Stephen. 2015. “Perceptions of Competence, Strength, and Age Influence Voters to Select Leaders with Lower-Pitched Voices.” PLoS One 10: e0133779.
Klofstad Casey A., Anderson Rindy C., and Peters Susan. 2012. “Sounds Like a Winner: Voice Pitch Influences Perception of Leadership Capacity in Both Men and Women.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 297: 26982704.
Kroodsma Donald E. 1990. “Using Appropriate Experimental-Designs for Intended Hypotheses in Song Playbacks, with Examples for Testing Effects of Song Repertoire Sizes.” Animal Behaviour 40: 11381150.
Laustsen Lasse. 2014. “Decomposing the Relationship Between Candidates’ Facial Appearance and Electoral Success.” Political Behavior 36: 777791.
Laustsen Lasse and Petersen Michael Bang. 2016. “Winning Faces Vary by Ideology: How Nonverbal Source Cues Influence Election and Communication Success in Politics.” Political Communication 33: 188211.
Laustsen Lasse, Peterson Michael Bang, and Klofstad Casey A.. 2015. “Vote Choice, Ideology, and Social Dominance Orientation Influence Preferences for Lower-Pitched Voices in Political Candidates.” Evolutionary Psychology 13: 113.
Little Anthony C., Burriss Robert P., Jones Benedict C., and Craig Roberts S.. 2007. “Facial Appearance Affects Voting Decisions.” Evolution and Human Behavior 28: 1827.
Lutz Georg. 2010. “The Electoral Success of Beauties and Beasts.” Swiss Political Science Review 16: 457480.
Machlis L, Dodd P. W. D., and Fentress J. C.. 1985. “The Pooling Fallacy—Problems Arising when Individuals Contribute More than One Observation to the Data Set.” Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 68: 201214.
Mattes Kyle, & Milazzo Caitlin. 2014. “Pretty Faces, Marginal Races: Predicting Election Outcomes Using Trait Assessments of British Parliamentary Candidates.” Electoral Studies 34: 177189.
Miyake Kunitate and Zuckerman Miron. 1993. “Beyond Personality Impressions: Effects of Physical and Vocal Attractiveness on False Consensus, Social Comparison, Affiliation, and Assumed and Perceived Similarity.” Journal of Personality 61: 411437.
O'Connor Jillian J. M., Fraccaro Paul J., Pisanski Katarzyna, Tigue Cara C., and Feinberg David R.. 2013. “Men's Preference for Women's Femininity in Dynamic Cross-Modal Stimuli.” PLoS One 8: e69531.
Puts David A., Apicella Coren L., and Cárdenas Rodrigo A.. 2012. “Masculine Voices Signal Men's Threat Potential in Forager and Industrial Societies.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279: 601609.
Puts David A., Hodges Carolyn R., Cárdenas Rodrigo A., and Gaulin Steven J. C.. 2007. “Men's voices as dominance signals: vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men.” Evolution and Human Behavior 28: 340344.
Rauschecker Josef P. 2015Auditory and Visual Cortex of Primates: A Comparison of Two Sensory Systems.” Eurorpean Journal of Neuroscience 41: 579585.
Re Daniel E., Dzhelyova Milena, Holzleitner Iris J., Tigue Cara C., Feinberg David R., and Perrett David I.. 2012. “Apparent Height and Body Mass Index Influence Perceived Leadership Ability in Three-Dimensional Faces.” Perception 41: 14771485.
Rosar Ulrich, Klein Markus, and Beckers Tilo. 2008. “The Frog Pond Beauty Contest: Physical Attractiveness and Electoral Success of the Constituency Candidates at the North Rhine-Westphalia State Election of 2005.” European Journal of Political Research 47: 6479.
Rosenberg Shawn W., Bohan Lisa, McCafferty Patrick, and Harris Kevin. 1986. “The Image and the Vote: The Effect of Candidate Presentation on Voter Preference.” American Journal of Political Science 30: 108127.
Rosenberg Shawn W. and McCafferty Patrick. 1987. “The Image and the Vote: Manipulating Voters’ Preferences.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 3147.
Rule Nicholas O., Ambady Nalini, Adams Reginald B., Ozono Hiroki, Nakashima Satoshi, Yoshikawa Sakiko, and Watabe Motoki. 2010. “Polling the Face: Prediction and Consensus Across Cultures.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98: 115.
Sigelman Lee, Sigelman Carol K., and Fowler Christopher. 1987. “A Bird of a Different Feather?: An Experimental Investigation of Physical Attractiveness and the Electability of Female Candidates.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 3243.
Spisak Brian R., Dekker Peter H., Krüger Max, and Vugt Mark van. 2012. “Warriors and Peacekeepers: Testing a Biosocial Implicit Leadership Hypothesis of Intergroup Relations Using Masculine and Feminine Faces.” PLoS One e30399.
Spisak Brian R. 2012. “The General Age of Leadership: Older-Looking Presidential Candidates Win Elections During War.” PLoS One e36945.
Spisak Brian R., Homan Astrid C., Grabo Allen, and Vugt Mark van. 2011. “Facing the Situation: Testing a Biosocial Contingency Model of Leadership in Intergroup Relations Using Masculine and Feminine Faces.” Leadership Quarterly 23: 273280.
Surawski Melissa K. and Ossoff Elizabeth P., EP. 2006. “The Effects of Physical and Vocal Attractiveness on Impression Formation of Politicians.” Current Psychology 25: 1527.
Thornhill Randy and Gangestad Steven W.. 1999. “Facial Attractiveness.” Trends in Cognitive Science 12: 452460.
Tigue Cara C., Borak Diana J., O'Connor Jilliam J.M., Schandl Charles, and Feinberg David R.. 2012. “Voice Pitch Influences Voting Behavior.” Evolution and Human Behavior 33: 210216
Alexander Todorov, Mandisodza Anesu N., Amir Goren A, and Hall Crystal C.. 2005Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes.” Science 308: 16231626.
U.S. Government Printing Office. 2013. “One Hundred Thirteenth Congress: Congressional Pictorial Directory. (gpo.gov), accessed December 16, 2015.
White Andrew Edward, Kenrick Douglad T., and Neuberg Steven L.. 2013Beauty at the Ballot Box: Disease Threats Predict Preferences for Physically Attractive Leaders.” Psychological Science 24: 24292436.
Zuckerman Miron, Kunitate Miyake, and Hodgins Holley S.. 1991. “Cross-Channel Effects of Vocal and Physical Attractiveness and their Implications for Interpersonal Perception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60: 545554.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Experimental Political Science
  • ISSN: 2052-2630
  • EISSN: 2052-2649
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-experimental-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 12

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 14

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 8

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 4

 Unknown (35 KB)
35 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 10

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 13

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 23

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 24

 Audio (71 KB)
71 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 25

 Unknown (12 KB)
12 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 1

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 19

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 6

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 21

 Word (85 KB)
85 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 7

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 20

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 16

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 5

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 18

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 9

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 3

 Unknown (3 KB)
3 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 15

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 17

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 22

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 11

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB
AUDIO
Supplementary materials

Klofstad supplementary material
Klofstad supplementary material 2

 Audio (43 KB)
43 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 21 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 166 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 6th November 2017 - 17th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.