Hostname: page-component-6b88cc9666-vmb8t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-14T15:01:54.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Unlisted Targets Sell at Discounts?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2018

Jeffrey F. Jaffe ,
Jan Jindra ,
David J. Pedersen  and
Torben Voetmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Academic literature, practitioners, courts, and regulators routinely assert that both private and subsidiary targets sell at discounts relative to public targets. However, the empirical evidence to support this conclusion is thin. Our work alters the methodology from prior research to avoid biases due to both one-sided sample truncation and Jensen’s inequality. Following these changes, we find no evidence that unlisted targets sell at discounts. Our results hold under a number of different approaches and after controlling for known determinants of acquisition pricing.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 1371 - 1401
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

1

We also thank Micah Officer for his detailed and thoughtful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper. Additionally, we thank Audra Boone, Natasha Burns, Jean Helwege, John McConnell, Rene Stulz, Ralph Walkling, and seminar participants at Drexel University, Rutgers University, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for helpful comments and discussions. Gerard Hoberg graciously shared with us the financial constraint data from Hoberg and Maksimovic (2015). Pedersen acknowledges partial financial support from the David Whitcomb Center for Research in Financial Services of Rutgers University. The SEC, as a matter of policy, disclaims responsibility for any private publication or statement by any of its employees. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the SEC or of the authors’ colleagues upon the staff of the SEC. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors, who are responsible for the content, and do not necessarily represent the views of The Brattle Group.

References

Agha, M., and Faff, R.. “An Investigation of the Asymmetric Link between Credit Re-Ratings and Corporate Financial Decisions: ‘Flicking the Switch’ with Financial Flexibility.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 29 (2014), 37–57.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, E.“Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy.” Journal of Finance, 23 (1968), 589–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargeron, L.; Schlingemann, F.; Stulz, R.; and Zutter, C.. “Why Do Private Acquirers Pay So Little Compared to Public Acquirers?” Journal of Financial Economics, 89 (2008), 375–390.10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, R.; Riffe, S.; and Thompson, R.. “The Method of Comparables and Tax Court Valuations of Private Firms: An Empirical Investigation.” Accounting Horizons, 13 (1999), 177–199.10.2308/acch.1999.13.3.177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, R. Applied Mergers and Acquisitions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2004).Google Scholar
Burch, T.“Locking Out Rival Bidders: The Use of Lockup Options in Corporate Mergers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 60 (2001), 103–141.10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00041-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capron, L., and Shen, J.-C.. “Acquisitions of Private vs. Public Firms: Private Information, Target Selection, and Acquirer Returns.” Strategic Management Journal, 28 (2007), 891–911.10.1002/smj.612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S.“Takeovers of Privately Held Targets, Methods of Payment, and Bidder Returns.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 773–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooney, J.; Moeller, T.; and Stegemoller, M.. “The Underpricing of Private Targets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 93 (2009), 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faccio, M.; McConnell, J.; and Stolin, D.. “Returns to Acquirers of Listed and Unlisted Targets.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41 (2006), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, F.; Lin, L.; and Officer, M.. “Acquisitions Driven by Stock Overvaluation: Are They Good Deals?” Journal of Financial Economics, 109 (2013), 24–39.10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.02.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, K.; Netter, J.; and Stegemoller, M.. “What Do Returns to Acquiring Firms Tell Us? Evidence from Firms That Make Many Acquisitions.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 1763–1793.10.1111/1540-6261.00477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaughan, P. A. Mergers, Acquisitions, and Corporate Restructurings. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2015).Google Scholar
Hadlock, C., and Pierce, J.. “New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 1909–1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, R.“A Theory for the Choice of Exchange Medium in Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Business, 60 (1987), 75–95.10.1086/296386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, R., and Lott, J.. “Externalities and Corporate Objectives in a World with Diversified Shareholder/Consumers.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (1996), 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoberg, G., and Maksimovic, V.. “Redefining Financial Constraints: A Text-Based Analysis.” Review of Financial Studies, 28 (2015), 1312–1352.10.1093/rfs/hhu089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, J.; Jindra, J.; Pedersen, D.; and Voetmann, T.. “Returns to Acquirers of Public and Subsidiary Targets.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 31 (2015), 246–270.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeller, S.; Schlingemann, F.; and Stulz, R.. “Firm Size and the Gains from Acquisitions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 73 (2004), 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Officer, M.“Termination Fees in Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 69 (2003), 431–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Officer, M.“The Price of Corporate Liquidity: Acquisition Discounts for Unlisted Targets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 83 (2007), 571–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Officer, M.; Poulsen, A.; and Stegemoller, M.. “Target-Firm Information Asymmetry and Acquirer Returns.” Review of Finance, 13 (2009), 467–493.10.1093/rof/rfn017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, S. Business Valuation Discounts and Premiums, 2nd ed., Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2009).Google Scholar
Pratt, S., and Grabowski, H.. Cost of Capital: Application and Examples, 5th ed., Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2014).10.1002/9781118846780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes-Kropf, M.; Robinson, D.; and Viswanathan, S.. “Valuation Waves and Merger Activity: The Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 77 (2005), 561–603.10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savor, P., and Lu, Q.. “Do Stock Mergers Create Value for Acquirers?” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 1061–1097.10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01459.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlingemann, F.; Stulz, R.; and Walkling, R.. “Divestitures and the Liquidity of the Market for Corporate Assets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 64 (2002), 117–144.10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00073-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W.. “Liquidation Values and Debt Capacity: A Market Equilibrium Approach.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 1343–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers.” Release No. 34-78167; File No. S7-25-15 (2016).Google Scholar
Uysal, V.“Deviation from the Target Capital Structure and Acquisition Choices.” Journal of Financial Economics, 102 (2011), 602–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whited, T., and Wu, G.. “Financial Constraints Risk.” Review of Financial Studies, 19 (2006), 531–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanni, K.“Quantifying the Private Company Discount: Multiples Approach and Acquisition Approach.” Business Valuation Alert, 16 (2015), 1–7.Google Scholar