Azarmi, Ted and Borochin, Paul 2016. The Financial Crisis.
Byun, Suk-Joon and Kim, Da-Hea 2016. Gambling preference and individual equity option returns. Journal of Financial Economics,
Carr, Peter and Wu, Liuren 2016. Analyzing volatility risk and risk premium in option contracts: A new theory. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 120, Issue. 1, p. 1.
Chen, Chao-Chun and Wang, Shih-Hua 2016. Net Buying Pressure and Option Informed Trading. Journal of Futures Markets,
Chen, Chien-Hua Su, Xuan-Qi and Lin, Jun-Biao 2016. The role of information uncertainty in moving-average technical analysis: A study of individual stock-option issuance in Taiwan. Finance Research Letters,
Ersan, Oguz and Alıcı, Aslı 2016. An unbiased computation methodology for estimating the probability of informed trading (PIN). Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Vol. 43, p. 74.
Ge, Li Lin, Tse-Chun and Pearson, Neil D. 2016. Why does the option to stock volume ratio predict stock returns?. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 120, Issue. 3, p. 601.
Hao, (Grace) Qing 2016. Is there information leakage prior to share repurchase announcements? Evidence from daily options trading. Journal of Financial Markets, Vol. 27, p. 79.
Huang, Henry H. Wang, Kent and Wang, Zhanglong 2016. A test of efficiency for the S&P 500 index option market using the generalized spectrum method. Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 64, p. 52.
Huang, MeiChi Wu, Chih-Chiang Liu, Shih-Min and Wu, Chang-Che 2016. Facts or fates of investors' losses during crises? Evidence from REIT-stock volatility and tail dependence structures. International Review of Economics & Finance, Vol. 42, p. 54.
Koutmos, Dimitrios 2016. Distilling private information from plain-vanilla options to predict future underlying stock price volatility: Evidence from the H-shares of Chinese banks. Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 37, p. 391.
Lee, Jaeram and Ryu, Doojin 2016. Asymmetric Mispricing and Regime-dependent Dynamics in Futures and Options Markets. Asian Economic Journal, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 47.
Stilger, Przemysław S. Kostakis, Alexandros and Poon, Ser-Huang 2016. What Does Risk-Neutral Skewness Tell Us About Future Stock Returns?. Management Science,
Arısoy, Yakup Eser Altay-Salih, Aslıhan and Akdeniz, Levent 2015. Aggregate volatility expectations and threshold CAPM. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 34, p. 231.
Chesney, Marc Crameri, Remo and Mancini, Loriano 2015. Detecting abnormal trading activities in option markets. Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 33, p. 263.
Choi, Youngsoo Jordan, Steven J. and Lee, Wonchang 2015. Information Content in Sneer Asymmetry: An Application to Out-of-Sample Implied Volatility Forecasting. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 51, Issue. sup3, p. 34.
Chua, Ansley DeLisle, R. Jared Feng, Sze-Shiang and Lee, Bong Soo 2015. Price-to-Earnings Ratios and Option Prices. Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 35, Issue. 8, p. 738.
Feng, Shu Zhang, Yi and Friesen, Geoffrey C. 2015. The relationship between the option-implied volatility smile, stock returns and heterogeneous beliefs. International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 41, p. 62.
Hilliard, Jimmy E. and Hilliard, Jitka 2015. Estimating Early Exercise Premiums on Gold and Copper Options Using a Multifactor Model and Density Matched Lattices. Financial Review, Vol. 50, Issue. 1, p. 27.
Kaplanski, Guy and Levy, Haim 2015. Trading breaks and asymmetric information: The option markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 58, p. 390.
Deviations from put-call parity contain information about future stock returns. Using the difference in implied volatility between pairs of call and put options to measure these deviations, we find that stocks with relatively expensive calls outperform stocks with relatively expensive puts by 50 basis points per week. We find both positive abnormal performance in stocks with relatively expensive calls and negative abnormal performance in stocks with relatively expensive puts, which cannot be explained by short sale constraints. Rebate rates from the stock lending market directly confirm that our findings are not driven by stocks that are hard to borrow. The degree of predictability is larger when option liquidity is high and stock liquidity low, while there is little predictability when the opposite is true. Controlling for size, option prices are more likely to deviate from strict put-call parity when underlying stocks face more information risk. The degree of predictability decreases over the sample period. Our results are consistent with mispricing during the earlier years of the study, with a gradual reduction of the mispricing over time.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.