Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T13:32:38.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Pooled Time-Series and Cross-Section Data to Test the Firm and Time Effects in Financial Analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Hui-shyong Chang  and
Cheng F. Lee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this study two alternative techniques to analyze pooled time-series and cross-section data are used to test the importance of firm effect and time effect in the financial analysis. These techniques are also integrated with the functional form parameter estimation method to show the importance of appropriate functional form in handling a pooled time-series and cross-section type econometric model. The data on the electric industry show that both the time effect and cross-section effect are of importance in explaining stock price variation. It is also found that linear form (and/or) log-linear form is not always appropriate in testing the importance of both time effect and firm effect in financial analyses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1977 , pp. 457 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Amemiya, T. “The Estimation of the Variances in a Variance-Components Model.” International Economic Review, Vol. 12 (1972), pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Balestra, P., and Nerlove, M.. “Pooling Cross-Section and Time-Series Data in the Estimation of a Dynamic Model: The Demand for Natural Gas.” Econometrica, Vol. 34 (1968), pp. 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Box, G.E.P., and Cox, D. R.. “An Analysis of Transformations.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Vol. 26 (1964), pp. 211–243.Google Scholar
[4]Bower, R. S., and Bower, D. H.. “Risk and Valuation of Common Stock.” The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 77 (1969), pp. 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Chung, P. S. “An Investigation of the Firm Effects Influence in the Analysis of Earnings to Price Ratios of Industrial Common Stocks.” The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 9 (1974), pp. 1009–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Durand, D. “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment: Comment.” American Economic Review, Vol. 49 (1959), pp. 639–654.Google Scholar
[7]Friend, I., and Puckett, M.. “Dividends and Stock Prices.” American Economic Review, Vol. 54 (1964), pp. 656–681.Google Scholar
[8]Gordon, J. J. “Dividends, Earnings and Stock Prices.” Review of Economic and Statistics, Vol. 41 (1959), pp. 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Maddala, G. S. “The Use of Variance Components Models in Pooling Cross-Section and Time-Series Data.” Econometrica, Vol. 39 (1971), pp. 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Nerlove, M. “Further Evidence on the Estimation of Dynamic Economic Relations from a Time-Series of Cross-Section.” Econometrica, Vol. 39 (1971), pp. 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Wallace, T. D., and Hussain, A.. “The Use of Error Components Models in Combining Cross-Section with Time-Series Data.” Econometrica, Vol. 37 (1969). pp. 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Zarembka, P. “Functional Form in the Demand for Money.” Journal of American Statistical Association, Vol. 63 (1968), pp. 502–511.Google Scholar