Cornell, Bradford Hsu, Jason and Nanigian, David 2017. Does Past Performance Matter in Investment Manager Selection?. The Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 43, Issue. 4, p. 33.
Cullen, Margaret M. and Brennan, Niamh M. 2017. Differentiating control, monitoring and oversight. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 30, Issue. 8, p. 1867.
Abinzano, I. Muga, L. and Santamaria, R. 2017. Bad company. The indirect effect of differences in corporate governance in the pension plan industry. International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 54, p. 63.
Hazenberg, Jan Jaap 2016. Independence and focus of Luxembourg UCITS fund boards. European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 117.
Casavecchia, Lorenzo and Tiwari, Ashish 2016. Cross trading by investment advisers: Implications for mutual fund performance. Journal of Financial Intermediation, Vol. 25, p. 99.
Hazenberg, Jan Jaap and Terink, Edwin 2016. Effectiveness of independent boards of UCITS funds. The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 22, Issue. 10, p. 854.
Kryzanowski, Lawrence and Mohebshahedin, Mahmood 2016. Board governance, monetary interest, and closed-end fund performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 38, p. 196.
Gottesman, Aron and Morey, Matthew 2016. Getting What You Paid For:Using Mutual Fund Governance to Predict the Activeness of Mutual Funds. The Journal of Investing, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 25.
Fricke, Eric 2015. Board Holdings, Compensation and Mutual Fund Manager Turnover. Journal of Financial Services Research, Vol. 47, Issue. 3, p. 295.
Dimmock, Stephen G. Gerken, William C. and Marietta-Westberg, Jennifer 2015. What determines the allocation of managerial ownership within firms? Evidence from investment management firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 30, p. 44.
Yu, Ping Tam, On Kit and Zhou, Jing 2015. Does Corporate Governance Matter in the Contractual Form of Fund Management Companies in China?. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 51, Issue. sup4, p. S89.
Block, Emily S. Glavas, Ante Mannor, Michael J. and Erskine, Laura 2015. Business for Good? An Investigation into the Strategies Firms Use to Maximize the Impact of Financial Corporate Philanthropy on Employee Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics,
Ju, Yongchun and Zhao, Linying 2014. Directors’ Ownership and Closed-End Fund Discounts. Journal of Financial Services Research, Vol. 45, Issue. 2, p. 241.
Adams, John C. Mansi, Sattar A. and Nishikawa, Takeshi 2014. AFFILIATED AGENTS, BOARDS OF DIRECTORS, AND MUTUAL FUND SECURITIES LENDING RETURNS. Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 461.
Calluzzo, Paul and Dong, Gang Nathan 2014. Fund governance contagion: New evidence on the mutual fund governance paradox. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 28, p. 83.
Claessens, Stijn and Yurtoglu, B. Burcin 2013. Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerging Markets Review, Vol. 15, p. 1.
Dvorak, Tomas and Norbu, Jigme 2013. Do Mutual Fund Companies Eat Their Own Cooking?. The Journal of Retirement, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 91.
Fricke, Eric 2013. Board compensation, holdings and mutual fund expense ratios. Managerial Finance, Vol. 39, Issue. 3, p. 228.
Gottesman, Aron and Morey, Matthew 2012. Mutual fund corporate culture and performance. Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 69.
Evans, Richard B. and Fahlenbrach, Rüdiger 2012. Institutional Investors and Mutual Fund Governance: Evidence from Retail–Institutional Fund Twins. Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 25, Issue. 12, p. 3530.
We use a unique database on ownership stakes of equity mutual fund directors to analyze whether the directors’ incentive structure is related to fund performance. Ownership of both independent and nonindependent directors plays an economically and statistically significant role. Funds in which directors have low ownership, or “skin in the game,” significantly underperform. We posit two economic mechanisms to explain this relation. First, lack of ownership could indicate a director’s lack of alignment with fund shareholder interests. Second, directors may have superior private information on future performance. We find evidence in support of the first and against the second mechanism.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.