Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

To Pay or Be Paid? The Impact of Taker Fees and Order Flow Inducements on Trading Costs in U.S. Options Markets

  • Robert Battalio, Andriy Shkilko and Robert Van Ness

Abstract

Consistent with prior literature, we find that average relative effective spreads are higher for venues that pay for order flow (PFOF) than for venues utilizing the maker-taker (MT) model. This relation becomes more nuanced when liquidity fees are incorporated into liquidity cost measures. For the majority of options, PFOF venues offer lower average liquidity costs net of taker fees. Net liquidity costs for the high-priced options, however, are lower for MT venues. Overall, our results suggest that the inclusion of fees and rebates can rationalize the routing of most, but not all, marketable orders to PFOF venues.

Copyright

Corresponding author

* Battalio (corresponding author), rbattali@nd.edu, Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame; Shkilko, ashkilko@wlu.ca, School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University; and Van Ness, rvanness@bus.olemiss.edu, School of Business, University of Mississippi.

References

Hide All
Anand, A.; Hua, J.; and McCormick, T.. “Make-Take Structure and Market Quality: Evidence from the U.S. Options Markets.” Management Science, 62 (2016), 32713290.
Angel, J.; Harris, L.; and Spatt, C.. “Equity Trading in the 21st Century.” Quarterly Journal of Finance, 1 (2011), 153.
Barclay, M.; Hendershott, T.; and McCormick, D. T.. “Competition among Trading Venues: Information and Trading on Electronic Trading Networks.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 26372666.
Battalio, R.Third Market Broker-Dealers: Cost Competitors or Cream Skimmers?Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 341352.
Battalio, R.; Corwin, S.; and Jennings, R.. “Can Brokers Have It All? On the Relation between Make-Take Fees and Limit Order Execution Quality.” Journal of Finance, 71 (2016), 21932238.
Battalio, R.; Greene, J.; and Jennings, R.. “Do Competing Specialists and Preferencing Dealers Affect Market Quality?Review of Financial Studies, 10 (1997), 969993.
Battalio, R.; Greene, J.; and Jennings, R.. “Order Flow Distribution, Bid–Ask Spreads, and Liquidity Costs: Merrill Lynch’s Decision to Cease Routinely Routing Orders to Regional Stock Exchanges.” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 7 (1998), 338358.
Battalio, R.; Hatch, B.; and Jennings, R.. “Toward a National Market System for U.S. Exchange-Listed Equity Options.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 933962.
Battalio, R., and Holden, C.. “A Simple Model of Payment for Order Flow, Internalization, and Total Trading Cost.” Journal of Financial Markets, 4 (2001), 3371.
Battalio, R.; Jennings, R.; and Selway, J.. “The Relationship among Market-Making Revenue, Payment for Order Flow, and Trading Costs for Market Orders.” Journal of Financial Services Research, 19 (2001), 3956.
Battalio, R., and Schultz, P.. “Regulatory Uncertainty and Market Liquidity: The 2008 Short Sale Ban’s Impact on Equity Option Markets.” Journal of Finance, 66 (2011), 20132053.
Bessembinder, H.“Selection Biases and Cross-Market Trading Cost Comparisons.” Working Paper, University of Utah (2003).
Bessembinder, H., and Kaufman, H.. “A Cross-Exchange Comparison of Execution Costs and Information Flow for NYSE-Listed Stocks.” Journal of Financial Economics, 46 (1997), 293319.
Boehmer, E.Dimensions of Execution Quality: Recent Evidence for US Equity Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 78 (2005), 553582.
Chakravarty, S.; Jain, P.; Upson, J.; and Wood, R.. “Clean Sweep: Informed Trading through Intermarket Sweep Orders.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47 (2012), 415435.
Colliard, J., and Foucault, T.. “Trading Fees and Efficiency in Limit Order Markets.” Review of Financial Studies, 25 (2012), 33893421.
Davidoff, S.“S.E.C.’s Review of Stock Trading Will See Some of Its Own Work.” New York Times DealBook, available at http://goo.gl/V0LtJa (Feb. 11, 2014).
De Fontnouvelle, P.; Fishe, R.; and Harris, J.. “The Behavior of Bid–Ask Spreads and Volume in Options Markets during the Competition for Listings in 1999.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 24372464.
Easley, D.; Kiefer, N.; and O’Hara, M.. “Cream-Skimming or Profit-Sharing? The Curious Role of Purchased Order Flow.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 811833.
Easley, D., and O’Hara, M.. “Price, Trade Size, and Information in Securities Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 19 (1987), 6990.
Goldstein, M.; Shkilko, A.; Van Ness, B.; and Van Ness, R.. “Competition in the Market for NASDAQ Securities.” Journal of Financial Markets, 11 (2008), 113143.
Harris, L.Minimum Price Variations, Discrete Bid–Ask Spreads, and Quotation Sizes.” Review of Financial Studies, 7 (1994), 148179.
Hu, J.Does Option Trading Convey Stock Price Information?Journal of Financial Economics, 111 (2014), 625645.
Jameson, M., and Wilhelm, W.. “Market Making in the Options Markets and the Costs of Discrete Hedge Rebalancing.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 765779.
Lee, C.Market Integration and Price Execution for NYSE-Listed Securities.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 10091038.
Malinova, K., and Park, A.. “Subsidizing Liquidity: The Impact of Make/Take Fees on Market Quality.” Journal of Finance, 70 (2015), 509536.
Petersen, M., and Fialkowski, D.. “Posted versus Effective Spreads: Good Prices or Bad Quotes?Journal of Financial Economics, 35 (1994), 269292.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
  • ISSN: 0022-1090
  • EISSN: 1756-6916
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-financial-and-quantitative-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed