Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 12
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Raje, Pratikkumar and Sinha, Krishnendu 2016. A physically consistent and numerically robust k-ϵ model for computing turbulent flows with shock waves. Computers & Fluids, Vol. 136, p. 35.

    Duraisamy, Karthikeyan 2016. 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting.

    Jinfeng Dang, and Ye Gao, 2015. 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference. p. 1.

    Agostini, L. Larchevêque, L. and Dupont, P. 2015. Mechanism of shock unsteadiness in separated shock/boundary-layer interactions. Physics of Fluids, Vol. 27, Issue. 12, p. 126103.

    Morgan, Brandon Duraisamy, Karthik and Lele, Sanjiva K. 2014. Large-Eddy Simulations of a Normal Shock Train in a Constant-Area Isolator. AIAA Journal, Vol. 52, Issue. 3, p. 539.

    Jaunet, V. Debiève, J. F. and Dupont, P. 2014. Length Scales and Time Scales of a Heated Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction. AIAA Journal, Vol. 52, Issue. 11, p. 2524.

    Singh, Anand Pratap and Duraisamy, Karthik 2016. Using field inversion to quantify functional errors in turbulence closures. Physics of Fluids, Vol. 28, Issue. 4, p. 045110.

    Jiang, Tetyana Schreyer, Anne-Marie Larchevêque, Lionel Piponniau, Sébastien and Pierre, Dupont 2016. 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting.

    Morajkar, Rohan R. Klomparens, Robin L. Eagle, W. Ethan Driscoll, James F. Gamba, Mirko and Benek, John A. 2016. Relationship Between Intermittent Separation and Vortex Structure in a Three-Dimensional Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction. AIAA Journal, Vol. 54, Issue. 6, p. 1862.

    Dawson, David M. and Lele, Sanjiva K. 2015. 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting.

    Bermejo-Moreno, Iván Campo, Laura Larsson, Johan Bodart, Julien Helmer, David and Eaton, John K. 2014. Confinement effects in shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions through wall-modelled large-eddy simulations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 758, p. 5.

    Nichols, Joseph W. Larsson, Johan Bernardini, Matteo and Pirozzoli, Sergio 2016. Stability and modal analysis of shock/boundary layer interactions. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics,

  • Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Volume 729
  • August 2013, pp. 231-284

Flow physics and RANS modelling of oblique shock/turbulent boundary layer interaction

  • Brandon Morgan (a1), K. Duraisamy (a1), N. Nguyen (a1), S. Kawai (a1) and S. K. Lele (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 19 July 2013

Large-eddy simulation (LES) is utilized to investigate flow physics and lower-fidelity modelling assumptions in the simulation of an oblique shock impinging on a supersonic turbulent boundary layer (OSTBLI). A database of LES solutions is presented, covering a range of shock strengths and Reynolds numbers, that is utilized as a surrogate-truth model to explore three topics. First, detailed conservation budgets are extracted within the framework of parametric investigation to identify trends that might be used to mitigate statistical (aleatory) uncertainties in inflow conditions. It is found, for instance, that an increase in Reynolds number does not significantly affect length of separation. Additionally, it is found that variation in the shock-generating wedge angle has the effect of increasing the intensity of low-frequency oscillations and moving these motions towards longer time scales, even when scaled by interaction length. Next, utilizing the LES database, a detailed analysis is performed of several existing models describing the low-frequency unsteady motion of the OSTBLI system. Most significantly, it is observed that the length scale of streamwise coherent structures appears to be dependent on Reynolds number, and at the Reynolds number of the present simulations, these structures do not exist on time scales long enough to be the primary cause of low-frequency unsteadiness. Finally, modelling errors associated with turbulence closures using eddy-viscosity and stress-transport-based Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations are investigated. It is found that while the stress-transport models offer improved predictions, inadequacies in modelling the turbulence transport terms and the isotropic treatment of the dissipation is seen to limit their accuracy.

Corresponding author
Current affiliation: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA. Email address for correspondence:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. Banerjee , R. Krahl , F. Durst & C. Zenger 2007 Presentation of anisotropy properties of turbulence, invariants versus eigenvalue approaches. J. Turbul. 8, 127.

E. Buckingham 1914 On physically similar systems: illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Phys. Rev. 4, 345376.

A. W. Cook 2007 Artificial fluid properties for large-eddy simulation of compressible turbulent mixing. Phys. Fluids 19 (5), 055103.

J. F. Debieve & P. Dupont 2009 Dependence between the shock and the separation bubble in a shock wave boundary layer interaction. Shock Waves 19, 499506.

J. R. DeBonis , W. L. Oberkampf , R. T. Wolf , P. D. Orkwis , M. G. Turner , H. Babinsky & J. A. Benek 2012 Assessment of computational fluid dynamics and experimental data for shock boundary-layer interactions. AIAA J. 50 (4), 891903.

J. Delery & J.-P. Dussauge 2009 Some physical aspects of shock wave/boundary layer interactions. Shock Waves 19, 453468.

D. S. Dolling 2001 Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: what next? AIAA J. 39 (8), 15171531.

J. P. Dussauge , P. Dupont & J. F. Debieve 2006 Unsteadiness in shock wave boundary layer interactions with separation. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10, 8591.

B. Ganapathisubramani , N. T. Clemens & D. S. Dolling 2009 Low-frequency dynamics of shock-induced separation in a compression ramp interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 636, 497–425.

E. Garnier 2009 Stimulated detached eddy simulation of three-dimensional shock/boundary layer interaction. Shock Waves 19, 479486.

R. A. Humble , F. Scarano & B. W. van Oudheusden 2007 Particle image velocimetry measurements of a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. Exp. Fluids 43, 173183.

S. Kawai & S. K. Lele 2008 Localized artificial diffusivity scheme for discontinuity capturing on curvilinear meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 227 (22), 94989526.

S. Kawai & S. K. Lele 2010 Large-eddy simulation of jet mixing in supersonic crossflows. AIAA J. 48 (9), 20632083.

S. Kawai , S. K. Shankar & S. K. Lele 2010 Assessment of localized artificial diffusivity scheme for large-eddy simulation of compressible turbulent flows. J. Comput. Phys. 229 (5), 17391762.

A. P. Lapsa & W. J. A. Dahm 2010 Stereo particle image velocimetry of nonequilibrium turbulence relaxation in a supersonic boundary layer. Exp. Fluids 50, 89108.

S. K. Lele 1992 Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103 (1), 1642.

A. Mani , J. Larsson & P. Moin 2009 Suitability of artificial bulk viscosity for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows with shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 228 (19), 73687374.

B. Morgan , J. Larsson , S. Kawai & S. K. Lele 2011b Improving low-frequency characteristics of recycling/rescaling inflow turbulence generation. AIAA J. 49 (3), 582597.

S. Pirozzoli , A. Beer , M. Bernardini & F. Grasso 2009 Computational analysis of impinging shock-wave boundary layer interaction under conditions of incipient separation. Shock Waves 19, 487497.

S. Pirozzoli & M. Bernardini 2011 Direct numerical simulation database for impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction. AIAA J. 49 (6), 13071312.

S. Pirozzoli & F. Grasso 2006 Direct numerical simulation of impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction at $M= 2. 25$. Phys. Fluids 18, 065113.

S. Pirozzoli , F. Grasso & T. B. Gatski 2004 Direct numerical simulation and analysis of a spatially evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer at $M= 2. 25$. Phys. Fluids 16 (3), 530545.

K. J. Plotkin 1975 Shock wave oscillation driven by turbulent boundary-layer fluctuations. AIAA J. 13 (8), 10361040.

J. Poggie & A. J. Smits 2005 Experimental evidence for Plotkin model of shock unsteadiness in separated flow. Phys. Fluids 17, 018107.

A. J. Smits , B. J. McKeon & I. Marusic 2011 High-Reynolds number wall turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 353375.

K. Stewartson 1974 Multistructured boundary layers on flat plates and related bodies. Adv. Appl. Mech. 14, 145239.

E. Touber & N. D. Sandham 2009a Comparison of three large-eddy simulations of shock-induced turbulent separation bubbles. Shock Waves 19, 469478.

E. Touber & N. D. Sandham 2009b Large-eddy simulation of low-frequency unsteadiness in a turbulent shock-induced separation bubble. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 23, 73107.

G. Urbin & D. Knight 2001 Large-eddy simulation of a supersonic boundary layer using an unstructured grid. AIAA J. 39 (7), 12881295.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • ISSN: 0022-1120
  • EISSN: 1469-7645
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *