Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Conceptual issues in institutional economics: clarifying the fluidity of rules

  • JAMIE MORGAN (a1) and WENDY OLSEN (a2)

Abstract:

This paper addresses the issue of how rules are conceptualized by Hodgson in Old Institutional Economics (OIE). The argument is put forward that the concept of rules can be constructively clarified. Rather than provide a general form of single rules within a rule system, we argue for a taxonomic range of single rule forms. This approach has the additional advantage of providing a more explicit account of how rules operate as part of a rule system. It also provides one way to address the fluidity of rules. Rules are understood to be more or less fluid (incomplete) and subject to a practical dynamism. This, we argue, can be differentiated from the idea of tendency based on the capacity of agents not to follow rules. A useful concept here is that of ‘mezzo rules’ or recodifications that both define the rule and distance the agent from their own rule-following behaviour. In pursuing the argument we also highlight various methodological implications. First, conceptual development is a key aspect of the OIE, particularly when it is located within Dow's structured pluralism. As such elaboration on rule forms enhances the consistency of OIE as methodology. Second, the exploration of a taxonomic range of rules and of forms of fluidity can provide useful resources in mapping out institutional processes in real research.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Archer, M. (2007), Making Our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Assiter, A. (2009), Kierkegaard, Metaphysics and Political Theory, London: Continuum.
Austin, J. L. (1961), Philosophical Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bergmann, M. (2008), An Introduction to Many-Valued and Fuzzy Logic: Semantics, Algebras and Derivation Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bigo, V. and Negru, I. (2008), ‘From fragmentation to ontologically reflexive pluralism’, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, 1 (2): 127150.
Blaug, M. (1992), The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain, second edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boehm, S. (2002), ‘The ramifications of John Searle's social philosophy in economics’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 9 (1):110.
Bourdieu, P. (1988), Homo Academicus, Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Cambridge: Polity.
Buller, D. (2005), Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature, Boston, MA: MIT.
Chick, V. and Dow, S. (2005), ‘The meaning of open systems’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 12 (3): 363381.
Colander, D. (2000), ‘The death of neoclassical economics’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22 (2): 127143.
Collin, F. (1997), Social Reality, London: Routledge.
Dequech, D. (2002), ‘The demarcation between the “Old” and the “New” institutional economics: recent complications’, Journal of Economic Issues, 36 (2): 565572.
Dewey, J. (1920/1957), The Reconstruction of Philosophy, Boston: Beacon Press.
Diamond, C. (ed.) (1976), Wittgenstein's Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics, Cambridge, 1939, Hassocks: Harvester.
Dow, S. (2004), ‘Structured pluralism’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 11 (3): 275290.
Downward, P. and Mearman, A. (2003), ‘Critical realism and econometrics’, in Downward, P. (ed.), Applied Economics and the Critical Realist Critique, London: Routledge.
Fleetwod, S. (2008a), ‘Structure, institution, agency, habit and reflexive deliberation’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 4 (2): 183203.
Fleetwod, S. (2008b), ‘Institutions and social structures’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38 (3): 241265.
Fullbrook, E (2004), ‘“Descartes” legacy: inter-subjective reality, intra-subjective theory’, in Davis, J., Marciano, A., and Runde, J. (eds.), Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy, London: Edward Elgar.
Fullbrook, E. (ed.) (2009), Ontology and Economics: Tony Lawson and his Critics, London: Routledge.
Granovetter, M. (1985), ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3): 481510.
Harding, S. ‘Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is “strong objectivity”?’, in Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (eds.), Feminist Epistemologies, London: Routledge.
Harre, R. and Krausz, M. (1996), Varieties of Relativism, Oxford: Blackwell.
Heilbroner, R. and Milberg, W. (1995), The Crisis of Vision in Modern Economic Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodgson, G. M. (1988), Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics, Cambridge: Polity.
Hodgson, G. M. (1998), ‘The approach of institutional economics’, Journal of Economic Literature, 36 (1): 166192.
Hodgson, G. M. (2001), How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science, London: Routledge.
Hodgson, G. M. (2002), ‘Reconstitutive downward causation: social structure and the development of individual agency’, in Fullbrook, E. (ed.), Inter-subjectivity in Economics: Agents and Structures, London: Routledge.
Hodgson, G. M. (2003), ‘John. R. Commons and the foundations of institutional economics’, Journal of Economic Issues, 37 (3): 547567.
Hodgson, G. M. (2004), The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, London: Routledge.
Hodgson, G. M. (2006), ‘What are institutions?’, Journal of Economic Issues, 40 (1): 125.
Hodgson, G. M. (2007a), ‘Evolutionary and Institutional Economics as the New Mainstream?’, Evolutionary and Institutional Economics, Review, 4 (1): 725.
Hodgson, G. M. (2007b), ‘The revival of Veblenian institutional economics’, Journal of Economic Issues, 41 (2): 325340.
Hodgson, G. M. (ed.) (2007c), The Evolution of Economic Institutions: A Critical Reader, London: Edward Elgar.
Hollis, Martin (1996), ‘How biological beasts learn the rules of the game’, The Times Literary Supplement, 12 January.
Koepsell, D. and Moss, L. (eds.) (2003), Searle on the Institutions of Social Reality: Extensions, Criticisms and Reconstructions, Oxford: Blackwell.
Kripke, S. (1982), Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Oxford: Blackwell.
Lahno, B. (2007), ‘Rational choice and rule-following behaviour’, Rationality and Society, 19 (4): 425450.
Lawson, T. (1997), Economics and Reality, London: Routledge.
Lerner, M. (1948), The Portable Veblen, New York: Viking Press.
Leijonhufvud, A. (1973), ‘Life among the econ’, Western Economic Journal, 11 (3): 327337.
Maki, U. (1993), ‘Economics with institutions: agenda for methodological enquiry’, in Maki, U., Gustaffson, B., and Knudsen, C. (eds.) Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology, London: Routledge.
Morgan, J. (2009a), ‘How should we conceive the continued resilience of the US Dollar as a reserve currency?’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 41 (1): 4361.
Morgan, J. (2009b), Private Equity Finance: Rise and Repercussions, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morgan, J. (2009c), ‘The limits of central bank policy: economic crisis and the limits of effective solutions’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33 (4): 581608.
Mundle, C. (1971), ‘Behaviourism and the private language argument’, in Jones, O. (ed.), The Private Language Argument, Basingstoke: MacMillan.
Neilsen, P. and Morgan, J. (2005), ‘No new revolution in economics?’, Economy and Society, 34 (1): 5175.
Nellhaus, T. (1998), ‘Signs, sociology and critical realism’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 28 (1): 124.
Ostrom, E. (1986), ‘An agenda for the study of institutions’, Public Choice, 48 (1): 325.
Parrish, J. (1967), ‘Rise of economics as an academic discipline: the formative years to 1900’, The Southern Economic Journal, 34 (1): 116.
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997), Realistic Evaluation, London: Sage.
Peirce, C. S. (1974), Collected Papers Of Charles Sanders Peirce: Volume 1, Cambridge MA: Bellknap, Harvard University Press.
Perraton, J. and Tarrant, I. (2007), ‘What does tacit knowledge actually explain?’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 14 (3): 353370.
Polanyi, M. (1962/1998), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy, London: Routledge.
Rabin, M. (1993), ‘Incorporating fairness into Game Theory And Economics’, American Economic Review, 83 (5): 12811301.
Ransdell, J. (1971), ‘Constitutive rules and speech act analysis’, Journal of Philosophy, 68 (13): 385400.
Ruben, D.-H. (1997), ‘John Searle's Construction of Social Reality’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57 (2): 443447.
Runde, J. (2002), ‘Filling in the Background’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 9 (1): 1130.
Rust, J. (2006), John Searle and the Construction of Social Reality, London: Continuum.
Santos, A. (2009), ‘Behavioural experiments: how and what we can learn about human behaviour’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 16 (1): 7788.
Schumpeter, Joseph (1997), History of Economic Analysis, London: Routledge.
Searle, J. (1969), Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. (1995), The Construction of Social Reality, London: Penguin.
Searle, J. (1999), Mind, Language and Society, London: Phoenix.
Tilman, R. (2007), Thorstein Veblen and the Enrichment of Evolutionary Naturalism, Columbia, MI: University of Missouri Press.
Tuomela, R. (1997), ‘Searle on social institutions’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57 (2): 435441.
Vanberg, V. (2007), Rational Choice, Preferences Over Actions and Rule-Following Behaviour, Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics, Freiburg: Walter-Euken Inst.
Veblen, T. (1914/2006), The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts, Cosimo Classics Series, New York: Cosimo, Inc.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953/1997), Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Blackwell.

Conceptual issues in institutional economics: clarifying the fluidity of rules

  • JAMIE MORGAN (a1) and WENDY OLSEN (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed