Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Not by technique alone. A methodological comparison of development analysis with Esther Duflo and Elinor Ostrom

  • AGNÈS LABROUSSE (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

This contribution aims at an original comparison of development analysis with Elinor Ostrom and Esther Duflo from a methodological standpoint, scrutinising their relationship to theory and their operative research strategies. Both perspectives are investigated as case studies for a broader discussion about significant trends in economics and social sciences. Duflo and the J-PAL's approach illustrates – in its own way – new trends and some blind alleys in contemporary forms of mainstream economics, whereas Ostrom and the Bloomington school point towards the marked theoretical and methodological reflexivity of institutionalism, its sensitivity to historical diversity and openness towards social sciences. Distinct social philosophies and episteme are at stake displaying a great divide between two brands of realism and pragmatism, two relationships to development, expertise and knowledge. The paper also contrasts Duflo's methodological monism and mechanistic piecemeal analysis with Ostrom's methodological pluralism and adaptive complex systems analysis.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: agnes.labrousse@u-picardie.fr
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Acemoglu (2010), ‘Theory, General Equilibrium, and Political Economy in Development Economics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24 (3): 1732.

P. Aligica (2005), ‘Institutional Analysis and Economic Development Policy: Notes on the Applied Agenda of the Bloomington School’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 57 (2): 159165.

P. Aligica (2013), Institutional Diversity and Political Economy. The Ostroms and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

P. Aligica and P. Boettke (2011), ‘The Two Social Philosophies of Ostroms’ Institutionalism’, The Policy Studies Journal, 39 (1): 2949.

A. Banerjee and E. Duflo (2009), ‘L’approche Expérimentale en économie du Développement’, Revue d’économie Politique, 119 (5): 691726.

T. Bernard , J. Delarue , and J. D. Naudet (2012), ‘Impact Evaluations: A Tool for Accountability? Lessons from Experience at Agence Française de Développement’, The Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4 (2): 314327.

P. Earl and J. Potts (2011), ‘A Nobel Prize for Governance and Institutions – Oliver Williamson and Elinor Ostrom’, Review of Political Economy, 23 (1): 124.

M. Fourcade (2006), “The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics”, American Journal of Sociology, 112 (1): 145195.

C. C. Gibson , K. Andersson , E. Ostrom , and S. Shivakumar , (2005), The Samaritan's Dilemma: The Political Economy of Development Aid, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

P. Glewwe , M. Kremer , S. Moulin , and E. Zitzewitz (2004), "Retrospective vs. prospective analyses of school inputs: the case of flip charts in Kenya," Journal of Development Economics, 74 (1), 251–68.

J. Groenewegen (2011), ‘The Bloomington School and American Institutionalism’, The Good Society, 20 (1): 1536.

I. Hacking (1988), ‘Telepathy: Origins of Randomization in Experimental Design’, Isis, 79 (3): 427451.

S. Heilmann (2008), ‘Policy Experimentation in China's Economic Rise’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 43 (1): 126.

G. Hodgson (2001), How Economics forgot History, London: Routledge.

M. Janssen , F. Bousquet , and E. Ostrom (2011), ‘A Multimethod Approach to Study the Governance of Social-Ecological Systems’, Natures, Sciences, Sociétés, 19 (4): 382394www.nss-journal.org.

A. Kirman (1992), ‘Whom or What Does the Representative Individual Represents?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6 (2): 117136.

E. Miguel and M. Kremer (2004), ‘Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities’, Econometrica, 72 (1): 159217.

C. Laurent , J. Baudry , M. Berriet-Solliec , M. Kirsch , D. Perraud , B. Tinel , A. Trouvé , N. Allsopp , and P. Bonnafou (2009), ‘Pourquoi s’intéresser à la notion d’evidence-based policy?’, Tiers-Monde, 200 (4): 853873.

A. Lee and M. L. Done (1999), ‘The Use of Nonpharmacologic Techniques to Prevent Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: A Meta-Analysis’, Anesthesia and Analgesia, 88 (6): 1362.

M. D. McGinnis (2011) ‘An Introduction to IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop: A Simple Guide to a Complex Framework for the Analysis of Institutions and Their Development’, Policy Studies Journal, 39 (1): 169183.

S. Morvant-Roux , I. Guérin , M. Roesch , and J. Y. Moisseron (2014), ‘Adding Value to Randomization with Qualitative Analysis: The Case of Microcredit in Rural Morocco’, World Development, 56, 302312.

E. Ostrom (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Actions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

E. Ostrom (1996), ‘Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development’, World Development, 24 (6): 10731087.

E. Ostrom (1999), ‘Coping With Tragedies of the Commons’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2 (1): 493535.

E. Ostrom (2007a), ‘A Diagnostic Approach for Going Beyond Panaceas’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104 (39): 1518115187.

E. Ostrom (2007b), ‘Challenges and Growth: The Development of the Interdisciplinary Field of Institutional Analysis’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 3 (3): 39264.

E. Ostrom (2011), ‘Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework’, Policy Studies Journal, 39 (1): 727.

V. Ostrom (1980), ‘Artisanship and Artifact’, Public Administration Review, 40 (4): 309317.

A. Quentin and I. Guérin (2013), ‘La Randomisation à l’épreuve du Terrain – L’exemple du Projet de Microassurance Sky au Cambodge’, Revue Tiers Monde, 213 (1): 179200.

S. Ramsey and J. Scoggins (2008), ‘Practicing on the Tip of an Information Iceberg? Evidence of Under-publication of Registered Clinical Trials in Oncology’, The Oncologist, 13 (9): 925929.

K. F. Schulz (1995), ‘Subverting Randomization in Controlled Trials’, JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 274 (18), 14561458.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 105 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 421 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.