Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Rules and collective action: an institutional analysis of the performance of irrigation systems in Nepal


This paper focuses on understanding rule systems by documenting existing rules and their development in irrigation management in Nepal. We analyze the rule formation of a sample of irrigation systems based on the ADICO syntax (Crawford & Ostrom, 1995; Ostrom, 2005). Farmer-managed irrigation systems generally are autonomous in devising their own rules based on local context considering the ideas, norms and beliefs shared within the community. Rule formation in agency-managed irrigation systems, however, is mostly done by external officials. Strong rule enforcement mechanisms were found in farmer-managed systems compared with agency-managed systems. Better rule enforcement created favorable conditions for collective action among the users and ensured better performance of the irrigation systems. Results imply that the formation of new rules should fully consider biophysical attributes as well as community beliefs and ideas.

Corresponding author
*Email: and
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. Bardhan (2000), ‘Irrigation and Cooperation: An Empirical Analysis of 48 Irrigation Communities in South India’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48 (4): 847865.

K. P. Bhatta , A. Ishida , K. Taniguchi , and R. Sharma (2005), ‘Performance of Agency-Managed and Farmer-Managed Irrigation Systems: A Comparative Case Study at Chitwan, Nepal’, Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 20 (2–3): 177191.

T. Dietz , E. Ostrom , and P. Stern (2003), ‘The Struggle to Govern the Commons’, Science, 302 (5652): 19071912.

W. F. Lam (1996), ‘Improving the Performance of Small-Scale Irrigation Systems: The Effects of Technological Investments and Governance Structure on Irrigation Performance in Nepal’, World Development, 24 (8): 13011315.

W. Leathes , J. W. Knox , M. G. Kay , P. Trawick , and J. A. Rodriguez-Diaz (2008), ‘“Developing UK Farmers” Institutional Capacity to Defend their Water Rights and Effectively Manage Limited Water Resources’, Irrigation and Drainage, 57 (3): 322331.

R. Meinzen-Dick , K. V. Raju , and A. Gulati (2002), ‘What Affects Organization and Collective Action for Managing Resources? Evidence from Canal Irrigation Systems in India’, World Development, 30 (4): 649666.

R. Meinzen-Dick (2007), ‘Beyond Panaceas in Water Institutions’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104 (39): 1520015205.

E. Ostrom , J. Burger , C. Field , R. B. Norgaard , and D. Policansky (1999), ‘Revisiting the Commons: Local Lessons, Global Challenges’, Science, 284 (5412): 278282.

R. M. Saleth and A. Dinar (2000), ‘Institutional Changes in Global Water Sector: Trends, Patterns, and Implications’, Water Policy, 2: 175199.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *