Skip to main content Accessibility help

Routines as multilevel mechanisms

  • JACK J. VROMEN (a1)

It is argued that routines can be fruitfully conceived of as multilevel mechanisms. The merits of viewing routines as multilevel mechanisms are that it helps in putting together a coherent picture of what routines are, what routines do, and how they do it. In particular, it helps in getting a clearer picture of how skills and routines are ontologically (rather than metaphorically) related to each other. It allows us to see that while routines are generative mechanisms producing recurrent patterns of firm behavior, as multilevel mechanisms they themselves are at the same time recurrent patterns of interaction within firms. Because of its ‘behavioral’ spirit, viewing routines as multilevel mechanisms (rather than as, for example, unobservable dispositions of firms to energize patterns of behavior in firms) greatly facilitates further empirical research on crucial, as yet unresolved issues, such as how stable and robust routines are and to what extent firm behavior is routine.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Abell, P., Felin, T., and Foss, N. J. (2008), ‘Building Microfoundations for the Routines, Capabilities, and Performance Links’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 29: 489502.
Becker, M. C. (2004), ‘Organizational Routines: A Review of the Literature’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13 (4): 643678.
Becker, M. C. (2005), ‘A Framework for Applying Organizational Routines in Empirical Research: Linking Antecedents, Characteristics, and Performance Outcomes of Recurrent Interaction Patterns’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14 (5): 817846.
Becker, M. C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. (2005), ‘Applying Organizational Routines in Understanding Organizational Change’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14 (5): 775791.
Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A. (2005), ‘Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative’, in Craver, C. F. and Darden, L. (eds.), ‘Special Issue: Mechanisms in Biology’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36: 421441.
Cohen, M. and Bacdayan, P. (1994), ‘Organizational Routines are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study’, Organization Science, 5: 554568.
Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M., and Winter, S. (1996), ‘Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 653698.
Craver, C. F. (2007), Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craver, C. and Bechtel, W. (2007), ‘Top–Down Causation without Top–Down Causes’, Biology and Philosophy, 22 (4): 547563.
Cummins, R. (1975), ‘Functional Analysis’, Journal of Philosophy, 72: 741764.
Cummins, R. (2000), ‘How Does It Work? vs. What Are the Laws? Two Conceptions of Psychological Explanation’, in Keil, F. and Wilson, R. (eds.), Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 117145.
Darden, L. (2001), ‘Discovering Mechanisms: A Computational Philosophy of Science Perspective’, in Jantke, K. P. and Shinohara, A. (eds.), Discovery Science, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 315.
Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elster, J. (1989), Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, J. (1998), ‘A Plea for Mechanisms’, in Hedstrom, P. and Swedberg, R. (eds.), Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 4573.
Elster, J. (2007), Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003), ‘Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94118.
Felin, T. and Foss, N. J. (2005), ‘Strategic Organization: A Field in Search of Micro-Foundations’, Strategic Organization, 3: 441455.
Felin, T. and Foss, N. J. (2006), ‘Individuals and Organizations: Further Thoughts on a Microfoundations Project’, in Ketchen, D. and Bergh, D. (eds.), Research Methodology in Strategy and Management 3, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 253288.
Felin, T. and Hesterly, W. S. (2007), ‘The Knowledge-Based View, Nested Heterogeneity, and New Value Creation: Philosophical Considerations on the Locus of Knowledge’, Academy of Management Review, 32: 195218.
Glennan, S. S. (1996), ‘Mechanisms and the Nature of Causation’, Erkenntnis, 44: 4971.
Glennan, S. S. (2002), ‘Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation’, Philosophy of Science (Supplement), 69: S342S353.
Hodgson, G. M. (2008), ‘The Concept of a Routine’, in Becker, M. C. (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Routines, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 1528.
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. (2004), ‘The Firm as an Interactor: Firms as Vehicles for Habits and Routines’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14 (3), 281307.
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. (2006), ‘Why We Need a Generalized Darwinism, and Why Generalized Darwinism is not Enough’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61 (1), 119.
Hutchins, E. L. (1995), Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992), ‘Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology’, Organization Science, 3: 383397.
Latour, B. (1986), ‘The Powers of Association’, in Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 264280.
Levitt, B. and March, J. (1988), ‘Organizational Learning’, Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319340.
Machamer, P., Darden, L., and Craver, C. F. (2000), ‘Thinking about Mechanisms’, Philosophy of Science, 67: 125.
Nelson, R. R. (2007), ‘Universal Darwinism and Evolutionary Social Science’, Biology and Philosophy, 22 (1): 7394.
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pentland, B. T. and Feldman, M. S. (2005), ‘Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14 (5): 793815.
Pentland, B. T. and Rueter, H. (1994), ‘Organisational Routines as Grammars of Action’, Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 39: 484510.
Simon, H. A. (1969), The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sugden, R. (1986), The Evolution of Rights, Cooperation, and Welfare, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Vromen, J. J. (1995), Economic Evolution: An Enquiry into the Foundations of New Institutional Economics, London: Routledge.
Vromen, J. J. (2004), ‘Conjectural Revisionary Economic Ontology: Outline of an Ambitious Research Agenda for Evolutionary Economics’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 11 (2): 213247.
Vromen, J. J. (2006), ‘Routines, Genes and Program-based Behaviour’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16 (5): 543560.
Vromen, J. J. (2007), ‘Neuroeconomics as a Natural Extension of Bioeconomics: The Shifting Scope of Standard Economic Theory’, Journal of Bioeconomics, 9: 145167.
Vromen, J. J. (2008), ‘Advancing Evolutionary Explanations in Economics’, in Kincaid, H., and Ross, D. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on Philosophy of Science on Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 337368.
Vromen, J. J. (2009), ‘Microfoundations in Strategic Management? Squaring Coleman's Diagram’ (forthcoming in Erkenntnis).
Wimsatt, W. C. (1994), ‘The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets’, in Matthen, M. and Ware, R. (eds.), ‘Biology and Society: Reflections on Methodology’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 20: 207274.
Wimsatt, W. C. (2007), Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Young, H. P. (1998), Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed