Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T23:08:11.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A political analysis of decentralisation: coopting the Tuareg threat in Mali

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2001

Jennifer C. Seely
Dissertation Fellow, Washington University in St. Louis. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 1997 annual African Studies Association Meeting in Columbus, Ohio. Thanks to Victor T. LeVine, Andrew Sobel and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions for improvement.


The decentralisation programme in Mali received a boost when municipal elections were finally held in 1998–99. This programme, initiated in 1992, is notable for its scope and the degree of autonomy extended to rural and urban communes. Given Mali's history of failed attempts at decentralisation, the current administration's commitment to the programme suggests that political motives are driving the reform. The decentralisation effort began as an attempt to placate separatist Tuareg groups in the north of Mali, and was subsequently extended to include the rest of the country. I argue that the extent of the programme, as well as the relative zeal with which it has been carried out, are products of a political strategy of cooptation on the part of President Alpha Oumar Konaré. This political analysis of decentralisation serves as a supplement to policy analyses of decentralisation in general.

Research Article
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)