Hostname: page-component-758b78586c-72lk7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-11-29T04:35:52.278Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Current knowledge of the family Cardiliidae (Bivalvia, Mactroidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2018

Javier H. Signorelli
Laboratorio de Reproducción y Biología Integrativa de Invertebrados marinos, LARBIM – IBIOMAR – CENPAT – CONICET. Bvd. Brown 2915, U9120ACD Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina 〈jsignorelli@cenpa–〉
J.G.M. (Han) Raven
National Center for Biodiversity Naturalis, Leiden, The Netherlands 〈〉


The family Cardiliidae has been scarcely studied. It was historically placed in the superfamily Mactroidea. Members of this family are characterized by a cordiform shell with a typical mactrid hinge, posterior adductor muscle placed into a myophore and three ornamental areas on the external surface of the shell. Six extant and 14 exclusively fossil species have been previously mentioned in the literature as belonging to the genus Cardilia. The geographical distribution, stratigraphic range, type material and type locality of each extant and fossil species are provided. In this work, four extant species and 11 exclusively fossil species belonging to the genus Cardilia are recognized. Extant species are from the western Pacific Ocean, Indian Ocean and eastern Atlantic Ocean, while fossil taxa are recorded from deposits of middle Eocene to late Pliocene in Europe and Asia,. One of them is formally described herein as Cardilia edwardsi new species.

Copyright © 2018, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Adams, H., and Adams, A., 1853–1858, The genera of Recent Mollusca; arranged according to their organization: London, John van Voorst, Paternoster Row, v. 2, 661 p.Google Scholar
Al-Khayat, J.A., 1997, The marine Mollusca of the Qatari waters, Arabian Gulf: Journal of Qatar University of Science, v. 17, p. 479491.Google Scholar
Beete Jukes, J., 1857, The Student’s Manual of Geology: Edinburgh, Adam and Charles Black, 607 p.Google Scholar
Beets, C., 1944 [1943], Notizen über die Gattung Cardilia Deshayes: Verhandelingen Geologisch Mijnbouwkundig Genootschap voor Nederland en Koloniën, v. 13, p. 355362.Google Scholar
Beu, A., and Maxwell, P.A., 1990, Cenozoic Mollusca of New Zealand: New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin, v. 58, p. 1518.Google Scholar
Bieler, R., Carter, J., and Coan, E., 2010, Classification of bivalve families, in Bouchet, P., and Rocroi, J.-P., eds., Nomenclator of Bivalve Families: Malacologia, v. 52, p. 1184.Google Scholar
Bronn, H.G., 1834, 1837, 1838, Lethaea Geognostica oder Abbildungen und Beschreibungen der für die Gebirgs-Formationen bezeichnendsten Versteinerungen: Stuttgart, Schweizerbart, v. 1, p. 1544 [1834, 1837]; v. 2, p. 545–1350 [1837, 1838].Google Scholar
Bronn, H.G., 1848–1849, Index Palaeontologicus oder Übersicht der bis Jetzt Bekannten Fossilen Organismen, bearbeitet unter Mitwirkung der Herren Prof. H. R. Göppert and Herm. v. Meyer, bearbeitet von Dr. H. G. Bronn. A. Nomenclator Palaeontologicus, in Alphabetischer Ordnung [two halves, each in a separate volume]: Stuttgart, Schweizerbart, Erste Hälfte, A–M, p. 1–775 [1848]; Zweite Hälfte, N–Z, p. 776–1381 [1848].Google Scholar
Carter, J.G., et al. 2011, A Synoptical Classification of the Bivalvia (Mollusca): Paleontological Contributions, v. 4, p. 147. Scholar
Combosch, D.J., Collins, T.M., Glover, E., Graf, D.L., Harper, E., Healy, J.M., Kawauchi, G.Y., Lemer, S., Mcintyre, E., Strong, E., Taylor, J.D., Zardus, J.D., Mikkelsen, P., Giribet, G., and Bieler, R., 2017, A family-level Tree of Life for bivalves based on a Sanger-sequencing approach: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, v. 107, p. 191208.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A.E.M., and Pissarro, G., 1906, Icongraphie complète des coquilles fossiles de l'Éocène des environs de Paris: Paris, H. Bouillants, v. 1, 45 pl.Google Scholar
Cotton, B.C., 1961, South Australia Mollusca—Pelecypoda. Handbook of the Flora and Fauna of South Australia Series: South Australian Branch of British Science Guild: Adelaide, W. L. Hawes, Government Printer, 363 p.Google Scholar
Dall, W.H., 1895, Synopsis of a review of the genera of Recent and Tertiary Mactridae and Mesodesmatidae: Malacological Society of London, Proceedings, v. 1, p. 203213.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.P., 1825, in Hardouin Michelin, M., Collection de M. Hardouin Michelin. Coquilles Fossiles du Bassin Parisien: 1 pl.+expl.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.P., 1827, in Blainville, H.M.D. de. 1825, 1827, Manuel de Malacologie et de Conchyliologie: Paris, F. G. Levrault, v. 1, 664 p.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.P., 1827, Figures de quelques coquilles de la collection de M. Hardouin Michelin: Bulletin des sciences naturelles et de Géologie, v. 11, p. 446447.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G P., 1844, Magasin de Zoologie, d’Anatomie Comparée et de Paléontologie: série 2, v. 6, n. 8, p. 18.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.P., 1850, Traité Élémentaire de Conchyliologie avec les Application de cette Science a la Géologie Tome Premièr, pt. 2, Conchifères Dimyaires, “1843–1850”: Paris, Victor Masson, v. 2, p. 129–824.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.P., and Milne Edwards, H., 1835, Histoire des Mollusques, in, Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de,, Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres: présentant les caractères généraux et particuliers de ces animaux, leur distribution, leurs classes, leurs familles, leurs genres, et la citation des principales espèces qui s’y rapportent: précédée d’une introduction offrant la détermination des caractères essentiels de l’animal, sa distinction du végétal et des autres corps naturels, enfin, l’exposition des principes fondamentaux de la zoologie,. 2nd edition, revised, edited, and augmented: Londres, J.B. Baillïère, v. 6, 600 p.Google Scholar
Dixon, F., 1850, The Geology and Fossils of the Tertiary and Cretaceous Formations of Sussex: London, Richard and John Edward Taylor [also Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans], 422 p.Google Scholar
Edwards, F.E., 1854, List of the fossil shells from the Eocene strata of Bracklesham Bay, Sussex: The Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, v. 10, p. 450454.Google Scholar
Fischer, P., 1861, Liste monographique des especes du genre Cardilia : Journal de Conchyliologie, v. 9, p. 335344.Google Scholar
Fischer, P., 1880–1887, Manuel de Conchyliologie et de Paleontologie Conchyliologique ou Historie Naturelle des Mollusques Vivants et Fossiles: Paris, Savy, 1369 p.Google Scholar
Friedberg, W., 1934–1936, Mięczaki mioceńskie Ziem Polskich. Część I – Małże (Mollusca miocaenica Poloniae. Pars II Lamellibranchiata): Kraków, Polskie Towarzystwo Geologiczne, 274 p.Google Scholar
Giribet, G., and Wheeler, W., 2002, On bivalve phylogeny: a high-level analysis of the Bivalvia (Mollusca) based on combined morphology and DNA sequence data: Invertebrate Biology, v. 121, p. 271324.Google Scholar
Gould, A.A., 1861, Descriptions of shells collected by the North Pacific Exploring Expedition: Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, v. 8, p. 1440.Google Scholar
Gray, J.E., 1840, Shells of molluscous animals, Eastern Zoological Gallery, in Synopsis of the Contents of the British Museum: London, G. Woodfall & Son, p. 89156.Google Scholar
Handmann, R., 1888, Die Neogenablagerungen des österreichisch–ungarischen Tertiärbeckens: Münster, Aschendorff, 71 p.Google Scholar
Herrmannsen, A.N., 1846–1852, Indicis Generum Malacozoorum Primordia. Nomina Subgenerum, Generum, Familiarum, Tribucm, Ordinum, Classium; Adjectis Auctoribus, Temporibus, Locis Systematicis, Atque Literariis, Etymis, Synonymis. Praetermittuntur Cirripedia, Tunicata et Rhizopoda: Cassel, Theodori Fischer, v. 1, p. 1–232 [1846], p. 233–637 [1847]; v. 2, p. 1–352 [1847], p. 353–492 [1848], p. 493– 717 [1849]; Supplementa et Corrigenda, p. 1–140 [1852].Google Scholar
Hidalgo y Rodriguez, J.G., 1903, Obras malacológicas. (4ª Parte) Estudios preliminares sobre la fauna Malacológica de las islas Filipinas: Memorias de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales de Madrid, v. 21, p. 1400.Google Scholar
Higo, S., Callomon, P., and Goto, Y., 1999, Catalogue and Bibliography of the Marine Shell-Bearing Mollusca of Japan. Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Polyplacophora, Scaphopoda: Ōsaka–fu, Yao–shi, Suchiro–chō, Japan, Elle Scientific Publications, 749 p.Google Scholar
Hörnes, M., 1859, Die Fossilen Mollusken des Tertiaer–Beckens von Wien unter der Mitwirkung von Paul Partsch: Abhandlungen der kaiserlich–koniglichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt, v. 4, p. 1477.Google Scholar
Huber, M., 2010, Compendium of Bivalves. A Full-color Guide to 3,300 of the World’s Marine Bivalves. A Status on Bivalvia after 250 Years of Research: Hackenheim, Germany ConchBooks, 901 p.Google Scholar
Johnson, R., 1964, The Recent mollusca of August Addison Gould: Bulletin of the United States National Museum, v. 239, p. 1172.Google Scholar
Karrer, F., 1877, Geologie der Kaiser Franz Josefs Hochquellen-Wasserleitung. Eine Studie in den Tertiär-Bildungen am Westrande des alpinen Theiles der Niederung von Wien: Abhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt, v. 9, p. 1420.Google Scholar
Keen, A.M., 1969, Superfamily Mactracea Lamarck, 1809, in Moore, R.C., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part N. Mollusca 6: Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. N595N610.Google Scholar
Korobkov, I., 1971, Paleontological Description: Leningrad, Nedra, 200 p. [in Russian]Google Scholar
Lamarck, J.B.P.A. de M. de, 1819, Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres: Paris, published by the author, v. 6, pt. 1, p. 1343.Google Scholar
Lamprell, K.L., and Healy, J., 1998, Bivalves of Australia: Leiden, Backhuys Publishers, v. 2, 288 p.Google Scholar
Lamy, E., 1917, Révision des Mactridae vivants du Muséum d´Histoire Naturelle de Paris: Journal de Conchyliologie, v. 63, p. 197270, 291–411.Google Scholar
Le Renard, J., and Pacaud, J.M., 1995, Révision des Mollusques paléogènes du Bassin de Paris. 2—Liste des références primaires des espèces: Cossmanniana, v. 3, p. 65132.Google Scholar
Lycett, J., 1848, Notes on the distribution of the fossil conchology of the Oolitic formations in the vicinity of Minchinhampton, Gloucestershire: Annals and Magazine of Natural History (series 2), v. 2, p. 248259.Google Scholar
Lynge, H., 1909, The Danish expedition to Siam 1899–1900. IV. Marine Lamellibranchiata: Det Kongeliga Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter, 7 Raekke, Naturvidenskab og Mathematisk Afdeling: Geographical Journal, v. 3, p. 100299.Google Scholar
Manzoni, A., 1868, Saggio di Conchiologia Fossile Subappennina: Fauna delle Sabbie Gialle: Imola, Ignazio Galeati e Figlio, 74 p.Google Scholar
Marcet, I Riba, J., 1955, Síntesis petrográfica y estratigráfica del Eoceno de la zona Palafrugell-Esclañá-Regencós (Bajo Ampurdán, provincia de Gerona): Annals de l’Institut d’Estudis Gironins, v. 10, p. 524.Google Scholar
Marwick, J., 1943, Some Tertiary Mollusca from North Otago: Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 73, p. 181192.Google Scholar
Maxwell, P.A., 1978, Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on some New Zealand Cenozoic Mollusca, with descriptions of new taxa: New Zealand Journal of Zoology, v. 5, p. 1546.Google Scholar
Meigen, J.W., 1830, Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europäischen zweiflügeligen Insekten: Hamm: Schulz-Wundermann, v. 6, 401 p.Google Scholar
Melvill, J.C, and Standen, R., 1907, The Mollusca of the Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, and Arabian Sea, as evidenced mainly through the collections of Mr. F. W. Townsend, 1893–1906; with descriptions of new species. Part II. Pelecypoda: Proceedings of Zoological Society of London, v. 1906, p. 783848.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, T., 2009, Miocene tropical sandy and rocky bottom molluscan assemblages of the Shimo Formation, Uchiura Group, Fukui Prefecture, Central Japan: Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, v. 35, p. 127151.Google Scholar
Newton, R.B., 1891, Systematic List of the Frederick E. Edwards Collection of British Oligocene and Eocene Mollusca in the British Museum (Natural History) with References to the Type Specimens from Similar Horizons Contained in Other Collections Belonging to the Geological Department of the Museum: London, Longmans and Co., 365 p.Google Scholar
Nicklès, M., 1955, Scaphopodes et lamellibranches récoltés dans l’ouest Africain: Atlantide Report (Scientific results of the Danish expedition to the coasts of tropical west Africa (1945–1946), v. 3, p. 93237.Google Scholar
Okamoto, K., and Terachi, M., 1974, Miocene molluscs from the Bihoku group at Miyauchi-Cho, Shobara City, southwest Japan: Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, n.s., v. 95, p. 341352.Google Scholar
Oliver, P.G., 1995, Bivalves (Bivalvia), in Dance, S.P., ed., Seashells of Eastern Arabia: Dubai, Abu Dhabi and London, Motivate Publishing, p. 194281.Google Scholar
Oostingh, C.H., 1934, Aanteekeningen over eenige bivalven uit het Neogeen van Java (mit Beschreibung einiger neuer Bivalven aus dem Neogen von Krawang, Java): De Ingenieur in Nederlands-Indie (IV), v. 4, p. 1922.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d’, 1849–1852, Prodrome de Paléontologie Stratigraphique Universelle des Animaux and Mollusques et Rayonnés: Faisant Suite au Cours Élémentaire de Paléontologie et de Geologie Stratigraphiques: Paris, Victor Masson, v. 1, 394 p [1849], v. 2, 427 p. [1850], v. 3, 389 p. [1852].Google Scholar
Otuka, Y., 1934, Tertiary structures of the northwestern end of the Kitakami mountainland, Iwate Prefecture: Japan, Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, v. 12, p. 566638.Google Scholar
Paetel, F., 1875, Die bisher veröffentlichten Familien—und Gattungsnamen der Mollusken: Berlin, Gebrüder Paetel, 229 p.Google Scholar
Paetel, F., 1883, Catalog der Conchylien-Sammlung: Berlin, Verlag von Gebrüder Paetel, 271 p.Google Scholar
Pantanelli, D., 1892, Lamellibranchi Pliocenici. Enumerazione e sinonimia delle specie dell’ Italia superiore e centrale: Bullettino della Societa Malacologica Italiana, v. 17, p. 1295.Google Scholar
Petit, R.E., 2009, George Brettingham Sowerby, I, II & III: their conchological publications and Molluscan taxa: Zootaxa, v. 2189, p. 1218.Google Scholar
Pictet, F.J., 1853–1857, Traité de Paléontologie, ou Histoire Naturelle des Animaux Fossiles Considérés dans leurs Rapports Zoologiques et Géologiques: Seconde ed. Paris, London, New York, J.–B. Baillière, v. 1, 584 p., v. 2, 727 p., v. 3, 654 p., v. 4, 768 p., atlas,77 p.Google Scholar
Roslim, A., Briguglio, A., Kocsis, L., Cori’c, S., and Razak, H., 2016, Late Miocene fossils from shallow marine sediments in Brunei Darussalam: systematics, palaeoenvironment and ecology: Geophysical Research Abstracts, v. 18, EGU2016-362, 2016 EGU General Assembly 2016.Google Scholar
Ruhoff, F., 1980, Index to the Species of Mollusca Introduced from 1850 to 1870: Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, v. 294, p. 1640.Google Scholar
Sacco, F., 1901, Parte 29. Donacidae, Psammobiidae, Solenidae, Mesodesmidae, Mactridae, Cardiidae, Myidae, Corbulidae, Glycymeridae, Gastrochaenidae, Pholadidae, Teredinidae, Cryptodontidae, Ungulinidae, Lucinidae, Tellinidae, Scrobiculariidae, Cuspidariidae, Solenomyidae, Pandoridae, Verticordiidae, Lyonsiidae, Ceromyidae, Arcomyidae, Anatinidae, Poromyidae, Pholadomyidae e Clavagellidae, in Bellardi, L., and Sacco, F., 1872–1904, I Molluschi dei Terreni Terziarii del Piemonte e della Liguria: Torino, C. Clausen, 31 pts., 216 p.Google Scholar
Saul, L.R., 1973, Evidence for the origin of the Mactridae (Bivalvia) in the Cretaceous: University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, v. 97, p. 159.Google Scholar
Savi, P., and Meneghini, G.G., 1850, Osservazioni stratigrafiche e paleontologiche concernanti la geologia della Toscana e dei paesi limitrofi (Appendix to Murchison, R.I.: Memoria sulla struttura geologica delle Alpi, degli Apennini e dei Carpati): Firenze, Stemparia granucale, 246 p.Google Scholar
Schultz, O., 2003, Bivalvia neogenica (Lucinoidea–Mactroidea), in Piller, W.E., ed., Catalogus Fossilium Austriae: Wien, Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 350 p.Google Scholar
Sieber, R., 1958, Die Tortonfauna von Steinabrunn bei Drasenhofen (Bez. Mistelbach, N.-Ö): Verhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, v. 1958, p. 142155.Google Scholar
Signorelli, J.H., and Carter, J.G., 2016, The Anatinellidae and Kymatoxinae: a reassessment of their affinities within the superfamily Mactroidea (Mollusca, Bivalvia): American Malacological Bulletin, v. 33, p. 204211.Google Scholar
Smith, E.A., 1906, Natural history notes from R.I.M.S. ‘Investigator.’—Series III., No. 10. On Mollusca from the Bay of Bengal and the Arabian Sea: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 18, p. 245264.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G.B. II, 1873, Monograph of the genus Cardilia , in Reeve, L.A., and Sowerby, G.B., II, eds., 1843–1878, Conchologia Iconica, or, Illustrations of the Shells of Molluscous Animals: London, L. Reeve and Co, v. 19, 1 pl. [unnumbered pages are explanations to plates]Google Scholar
Stefanini, G., 1916, Fossili del Neogene Veneto: Memorie dell’Istituto Geologico della Regia Universita di Padova, v. 4, p. 1198.Google Scholar
Studencka, B., Gontsharova, I., and Popov, S., 1998, The bivalve faunas as a basis for reconstruction of the middle Miocene history of the Paratethys: Acta Geologica Polonica, v. 48, p. 285342.Google Scholar
Taguchi, E., 2002, Stratigraphy, molluscan fauna and paleoenvironment of the Miocene Katsuta Group in Okayama Prefecture, Southwest Japan: Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, v. 29, p. 95133.Google Scholar
Takayasu, K., 1981, Fossil Molluscs from the Miocene Masuda Group at Okuda, Masuda City, Molluscan Fossils from Various Localities in Shimane Prefecture, Part 2: Memoirs of the Faculty of Science of Shimane University, v. 15, p. 89108.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.D., Kennedy, W.J., and Hall, A., 1973, The shell structure and mineralogy of the Bivalvia. II. Lucinacea–Clavagellacea. Conclusions: Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology, v. 22, p. 253294.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.D., Williams, S.T., Glover, E.A., and Dyak, O., 2007, A molecular phylogeny of heterodont bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Heterodonta): new analyses of 18S and 28S rRNA genes: Zoologica Scripta, v. 36, p. 587606.Google Scholar
Tejkal, J., Ondrejíčková, A., and Csepreghy–Meznerics, I., 1967, Die Mollusken der Karpatischen Serie, in Cicha, I., Seneš, J., and Tejkal, J., eds., Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen M3 (Karpatien): Slowakische Akademie der Wissenschaften Bratislava, p. 149212.Google Scholar
Tennant, J., 1847, A stratigraphical list of British Fossils; arranged under the principal divisions of the British Museum strata, with a few elementary remarks on their character and localities: London, Reeve Brothers, 132 p.Google Scholar
Tsuda, K., 1959, New Miocene molluscs from the Kurosedani Formation in Toyama Prefecture: Japan, Journal of the Faculty of Science, Niigata University series 2, v. 3, p. 67110.Google Scholar
Van Regteren, Altena, C.O, and Beets, C., 1945, Eine Neogene Molluskenfauna vom Tji Gugur (Priangan), W. Java. Verhandelingen van het Geologisch–Mijnbouwkundig Genootschap voor Nederland en Koloniën: Geologische serie, v. 14, p. 3770. [the book carries the date 1944 but according to Winkler Prins, 1996 it appeared in 1945]Google Scholar
Venzo, S., 1934, Il Neogene del Trentino, del Veronese e del Bresciano: Memorie del Museo di Storia Naturale della Venezia Tridentina, v. 2, p. 199.Google Scholar