Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T12:31:22.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A diverse new assemblage of green lacewings (Insecta, Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) from the early Eocene Okanagan Highlands, western North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Vladimir N. Makarkin  and
S. Bruce Archibald
Vladimir N. Makarkin
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, Russia,
S. Bruce Archibald
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MA, USA Royal BC Museum, Victoria, BC, Canada,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The early Eocene green lacewings (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) of the Okanagan Highlands deposits of McAbee, and Driftwood Canyon, British Columbia (Canada) and Republic, Washington (U.S.A.) are treated in detail for the first time. At least six genera are present, one unnamed, three new, with at least 10 new species, six named: Protochrysa fuscobasalis n. sp. (McAbee) (Limaiinae, the youngest known record of the subfamily), Okanaganochrysa coltsunae n. gen. n. sp. (McAbee), Adamsochrysa aspera n. gen. n. sp. (McAbee), A. wilsoni n. gen. n. sp. (Republic), Archaeochrysa profracta n. sp. (McAbee), and Pseudochrysopa harveyi n. gen. n. sp. (Driftwood Canyon) (all Nothochrysinae, the latter provisionally). The four unnamed species include one assigned to Pseudochrysopa, two likely belonging to Adamsochrysa, and one of an unknown nothochrysine genus. Microtholi are detected on the abdominal sclerites of Adamsochrysa wilsoni, and the spermatheca and spermathecal duct in the abdomen of Pseudochrysopa harveyi, the first reported occurrences of these preserved in fossil Chrysopidae. Structures were detected on the apical wing margins of some species that appear similar to trichosors, which are unknown in Chrysopidae, but are present in some other neuropteran families. This is the richest described assemblage of the family anywhere in the fossil record. Okanagan chrysopids were also morphologically and presumably ecologically diverse, including large species with rich venation and well as those with simplified venation and the smallest known fossil species. This is the oldest reported occurrence of the family in North America.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 87 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 123 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, P. A. 1957. A new genus and new species of Chrysopidae from the western United States, with remarks on the wing venation of the family (Neuroptera). Psyche, 63:67–74.Google Scholar
Adams, P. A. 1967. A review of the Mesochrysinae and Nothochrysinae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 135:215–238.Google Scholar
Adams, P. A. 1970. A review of the New World Dilaridae. Postilla, 148:1–30.Google Scholar
Adams, P. A. 1996. Venational homologies and nomenclature in Chrysopidae, with comments on the Myrmeleontoidea (Insecta: Neuroptera), p. 19–30. InCanard, M., Aspöck, H. and Mansel, M. W.(eds.), Pure and Applied Research in Neuropterology. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Neuropterology. Privately printed, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
Adams, P. A. and Penny, N. D. 1992a. New genera of Nothochrysinae from South America (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 68:216–221.Google Scholar
Adams, P. A. and Penny, N. D. 1992b. Review of the South American genera of Nothochrysinae (Insecta: Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), p. 35–41. InCanard, M., Aspöck, H., and Mansell, M. W.(eds.), Current Research in Neuropterology. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Neuropterology. Privately printed, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
Archibald, S. B. 2007. Climate and Species Diversity: The Eocene Okanagan Highlands Insect View. Vol. 1. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, vi+604 p.Google Scholar
Archibald, S. B. 2009. New Cimbrophlebiidae (Insecta: Mecoptera) from the early Eocene McAbee, British Columbia, Canada and Republic, Washington, U.S.A. Zootaxa, 2249:51–62.Google Scholar
Archibald, S. B., Bossert, W. H., Greenwood, D. R., and Farrell, B. D. 2010. Seasonality, the latitudinal gradient of diversity, and Eocene insects. Paleobiology, 36:374–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, S. B., Greenwood, D. R., Smith, R. Y., Mathewes, R. W., and Basinger, J. F. 2011. Early Eocene Lagerstätten of the Okanagan Highlands (British Columbia and Washington State). Geoscience Canada, 38:145–154.Google Scholar
Archibald, S. B. and Makarkin, V. N. 2006. Tertiary giant lacewings (Neuroptera: Polystoechotidae): revision and description of new taxa from western North America and Denmark. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 4:119–155, 307 (errata).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, S. B., Makarkin, V. N., and Ansorge, J. 2009. New fossil species of Nymphidae (Neuroptera) from the Eocene of North America and Europe. Zootaxa, 2157:59–68.Google Scholar
Barnard, P. C. 1984. Adult morphology related to classification, p. 19–29. InCanard, M., Semeria, Y. and New, T. R.(eds.), Biology of Chrysopidae. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1909. Visit to the Florissant exhibit in the British Museum (Natural History). Proceedings of the Geologists Association of London, 21:159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, S. J. 1997. An overview of the current status of Chrysopidae (Neuroptera) systematics. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift (N.F.), 44:267–275.Google Scholar
Brooks, S. J. and Barnard, P. C. 1990. The green lacewings of the world: a generic review (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Entomology), 59:117–286.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. C. C. 1839. Handbuch der Entomologie. Zweiter Band. Besondere Entomologie. Zweite Abtheilung. Kaukerfe. Gymnognatha. (Zweite Hälfte; vulgo Neuroptera). Theod. Chr. Friedr. Enslin, Berlin, i–xii +757 -1050.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1935. Tertiary insects of the family Chrysopidae. Journal of Paleontology, 9:259–271.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1943. Osmylidae of the Florissant shales, Colorado (Insecta-Neuroptera). American Journal of Science, 241:753–760.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1960. Fossil Nemopteridae (Neuroptera). Psyche, 66:20–24.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F. M., Snyder, T. E., Alexander, C. P., James, M. T., and Hull, F. M. 1938. Fossil insects from the Creede Formation, Colorado. Part 1. Introduction, Neuroptera, Isoptera and Diptera. Psyche, 45:105–118.Google Scholar
Chambers, L., Pringle, M., Fitton, G., Larsen, L. M., Pedersen, A. K., and Parrish, R. 2003. Recalibration of the Palaeocene–Eocene boundary (P–E) using high precision U-Pb and Ar-Ar isotopic dating, p. 09681. InEGSAGU-EUG Joint Assembly, Nice, 6th–11th April 2003. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 5.Google Scholar
CoBabe, E. A., Chamberlain, K. R., Ivie, M. A., and Giersch, J. J. 2002. A new insect and plant Lagerstätte from a Tertiary lake deposits along the Canyon Ferry Reservoir, southwestern Montana. Rocky Mountain Geology, 37:13–30.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1908. Fossil Chrysopidae. Canadian Entomologist, 40:90–91.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1909. Two fossil Chrysopidae. Canadian Entomologist, 41:218–219.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1913. Some fossil insects from Florissant, Colorado. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 44:341–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1914. New and little-known insects from the Miocene of Florissant, Colorado. Journal of Geology, 22:714–724.Google Scholar
Dayvault, R. D., Codington, L. A., Kohls, D., Hawes, W. D., and Ott, P. M. 1995. Fossil insects and spiders from three locations in the Green River Formation of the Piceance Creek Basin, Colorado, p. 97–115. InAverett, W. R.(ed.), The Green River Formation in Piceance Creek and Eastern Uinta Basins. Grand Junction Geological Society, Grand Junction.Google Scholar
Díaz-Aranda, L. M. and Monserrat, V. J. 1995. Aphidophagous predator diagnosis: key to genera of European chrysopid larvae (Neur.: Chrysopidae). Entomophaga, 40:169–181.Google Scholar
Duelli, P., Obrist, M. K., and Flückiger, P. F. 2002. Forest edges are biodiversity hotspots—also for Neuroptera. p. 75–87. InSziráki, G.(ed.), Neuropterology 2000. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Neuropterology. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 48 (Suppl. 2).Google Scholar
Esben-Petersen, P. 1917. Australian Neuroptera. Part III. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 42:203–219.Google Scholar
Evanoff, E., McIntosh, W. C., and Murphey, P. C. 2001. Stratigraphic summary and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of the Florissant Formation, Colorado, p. 1–16. InEvanoff, E., Gregory-Wodzicki, K., and Johnson, K.(eds.), Fossil flora and stratigraphy of the Florissant Formation, Colorado. Proceedings of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science, (ser. 4), 1.Google Scholar
Göppert, H. R. and Berendt, G. C. 1845. Der Bernstein und die in ihm befindlichen Pflanzenreste der Vorwelt, bearbeitet von professor Dr. H. R. Goeppert und Dr. G. C. Berendt. InBerendt, G. C.(ed.), Die im Bernstein befindlichen organischen reste der Vorwelt, gesammelt in verbindung mit mehreren bearbeitet und herausgegeben von Dr. Georg Carl Berendt. Band 1 , Abt.1. Nicolaische Buchhandlung, Berlin, iv+125 p.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. R. and Wing, S. L. 1995. Eocene continental climates and latitudinal temperature gradients. Geology, 23:1044–1048.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, D. R., Archibald, S. B., Mathewes, R. W., and Moss, P. T. 2005. Fossil biotas from the Okanagan Highlands, southern British Columbia and northeastern Washington State: climates and ecosystems across an Eocene landscape. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 42:167–185.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. and Engel, M. S. 2005. Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, xv + 755 p.Google Scholar
Hagen, H. A. 1866. Hemerobidarum Synopsis synonymica. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung, 27:369–462.Google Scholar
Harding, I. C. and Chant, L. S. 2000. Self-sedimented diatom mats as agents of exceptional fossil preservation in the Oligocene Florissant Lake Beds, Colorado, United States. Geology (Boulder), 28:195–198.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICZN, 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 4th edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, xxix + 305 p.Google Scholar
Kimmins, D. E. 1952. Some new Australian Chrysopidae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (ser. 12), 5:69–81.Google Scholar
Killington, F. J. 1936. A monograph of the British Neuroptera. Vol. 1. Ray Society, London, xi + 269 p.Google Scholar
Krüger, L. 1923. Neuroptera succinica baltica. Die im baltischen Bernstein eingeschlossenen Neuroptera des Westpreussischen Provinzial-Museums (heute Museum für Naturkunde und Vorgeschichte) in Danzig. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung, 84:68–92.Google Scholar
Lahmers, K. 2011. A primer on lacewings and a quick look at a prehistoric lacewing captured in Florissant's prehistoric lake shales. Pick and Pack. The Bulletin of Colorado Springs Mineralogical Society, 51 (3):6–8.Google Scholar
Leopold, E. B., Manchester, S. R., and Meyer, H. W. 2008. Phytogeography of the late Eocene Florissant flora reconsidered, p. 53–70. InMeyer, H. W. and Smith, D. W.(eds.), Paleontology of the upper Eocene Florissant Formation, Colorado. Geological Society of America Special Paper 435.Google Scholar
Lewis, S. E. and Lee, M. D. 1992. Fossil Neuroptera from the Ruby River Range (Oligocene) near Alder, Montana. Occasional Papers in Paleobiology at St. Cloud State University, 6 (7):1–6.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. 10th ed. Vol. 1. Salvii, Holmiae, 824p.Google Scholar
McLachlan, R. 1868. New genera and species, etc., of neuropterous insects; and a revision of Mr. F. Walker's British Museum Catalogue of Neuroptera, part ii (1853), as far as the end of the genus Myrmeleon. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 9:230–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makarkin, V. N. 1997. Fossil Neuroptera of the Lower Cretaceous of Baisa, East Siberia. Part 3. Chrysopidae. Spixiana, 20:107–118.Google Scholar
Makarkin, V. N. and Archibald, S. B. 2009. A new genus and first Cenozoic fossil record of moth lacewings (Neuroptera: Ithonidae) from the early Eocene of North America. Zootaxa, 2063:55–63.Google Scholar
Makarkin, V. N., Archibald, S. B., and Oswald, J. D. 2003. New early Eocene Brown Lacewings (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae) from Western North America. Canadian Entomologist, 135:637–653.Google Scholar
Makarkin, V. N. and Kholin, S. K. 1995. Sexual differences in relative length of forewing in Hemerobiidae (Neuroptera). Beiträge zür Entomologie, 45:421–425.Google Scholar
Martins-Neto, R. G. 2003. The Santana Formation Paleoentomofauna reviewed. Part I – Neuropteroida (Neuroptera and Raphidioptera): systematic and phylogeny, with description of new taxa. Acta Geologica Leopoldensia (R.S.), 25 (55):35–66.Google Scholar
Martins-Neto, R. G. and Vulcano, M. A. 1989. Neurópteros (Insecta: Planipennia) da Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. I–Família Chrysopidae. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 60:189–201.Google Scholar
Martynov, A. 1927. Jurassic fossil insects from Turkestan. 7. Some Odonata, Neuroptera, Thysanoptera. Bulletin de l'Academie des Sciences de l'URSS, 21:757–768.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. W. 2007. A review of paleotemperature–lapse rate methods for estimating paleoelevation from fossil floras. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 66:155–171.Google Scholar
Moss, P. T., Greenwood, D. R., and Archibald, S. B. 2005. Regional and local vegetation community dynamics of the Eocene Okanagan Highlands (British Columbia/Washington State) from palynology. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 42:187–204.Google Scholar
Mustoe, G. E. 2005. Diatomaceous origin of siliceous shale in Eocene lakebeds of central British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 42:231–241.Google Scholar
Navás, L. 1910. Crisópidos (Ins. Neur.) nuevos. Brotéria (Zoológica), 9:38–59.Google Scholar
Nel, A., Delclòs, X., and Hutin, A. 2005. Mesozoic chrysopid-like Planippenia: a phylogenetic approach (Insecta: Neuroptera). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 41:29–68.Google Scholar
O'Brien, N. R., Meyer, H. W., and Harding, I. C. 2008. The role of biofilms in fossil preservation, Florissant Formation, Colorado, p. 19–31. InMeyer, H. W. and Smith, D. M.(eds.), Paleontology of the upper Eocene Florissant Formation, Colorado. Geological Society of America Special Paper 435.Google Scholar
O'Brien, N. R., Meyer, H. W., Reilly, K., Ross, A. M., and Maguire, S. 2002. Microbial taphonomic provesses in the fosisl ization of insects and plants in the late Eocene Florissant Formation, Colorado. Rocky Mountain Geology, 37:1–11.Google Scholar
Oswald, J. D. 1993. Revision and cladistic analysis of the world genera of the family Hemerobiidae (Insecta: Neuroptera). Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 101:143–299.Google Scholar
Otofuji, Y., Matsuda, T., Itaya, T., Shibata, T., Matsumoto, M., Yamamoto, T., Morimoto, C., Kulinich, R. G., Zimin, P. S., Matyunin, A. P., Sakhno, N. G., and Kimura, K. 1995. Late Cretaceous to early Paleogene paleomagnetic results from Sikhote Alin, far eastern Russia: implications for deformation of East Asia. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 130:95–108.Google Scholar
Pigg, K. B., Stockey, R. A., and Maxwell, S. L. 1993. Paleomyrtinia, a new genus of permineralized myrtaceous fruit and seeds from the Eocene of British Columbia and Paleocene of North Dakota. Canadian Journal of Botany, 71:1–9.Google Scholar
Popov, V. K. and Grebennikov, A. V. 2001. New data on the age of effusives from the Bogopol Formation in Primorye. Tikhookeanskaya Geologiya, 2001 (3):47–54. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Rasnitsyn, A.P. and Zherikhin, V. V. 2002. 4. Appendix: Alphabetic List of Selected Insect Fossil Sites. 4.1. Impression Fossils, p. 437–444. InRasnitsyn, A. P. and Quicke, D. L. J.(eds.), History of Insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Ren, D. and Guo, Z. G. 1996. On the new fossil genera and species of Neuroptera (Insecta) from the Late Jurassic of northeast China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 21:461–479.Google Scholar
Ren, D. and Makarkin, V. N. 2009. Ascalochrysidae—a new lacewing family from the Mesozoic of China (Insecta: Neuroptera: Chrysopoidea). Cretaceous Research, 30:1217–1222.Google Scholar
Rust, J. 1999. Biologie der Insekten aus dem ältesten Tertiär Nordeuropas. Habilitationsschrift zur Erlangung der venia legendi für das Fach Zoologie. Biologische Fakultät der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, unpublished postdoctoral thesis, 482p.Google Scholar
Scheven, J. 2004. Bernstein-Einschlüsse: Eine untergegangene Welt bezeugt die Schöpfung. Erinnerungen an die Welt vor der Sintflut. Kuratorium Lebendige Vorwelt, Hofheim a.T., 160p.Google Scholar
Schlüter, T. 1982. Cimbrochrysa moleriensis n. g. n. sp. und Hypochrysa hercyniensis n. sp., zwei fossile Chrysopidae-Arten (Insecta: Planipennia) aus dem europäischen Tertiär. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, 1982 (5):257–264.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. G. 1851. Symbolae ad monographiam generis Chrysopae, Leach. Hirt, Vratislaviae, 178 p.Google Scholar
Scudder, H. I. (ed.), Firby, J. R., Lugaski, T., Mawby, J. E., Savage, D. E., and Schorn, H. E.(eds.). 1986. Report of a paleontological inventory of the Stewart Valley Fossil Area (proposed as an Area of Critical Environmental Concern). Bureau of Land Management, Nevada State Office, U.S. Department of the Interior, Reno, Nevada, 243p.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1885. Classe Insecta. Insecten, p. 57–172. InZittel, K. A.(ed.), Handbuch der Palaeontologie. Abt. 1. Palaeozoologie. Band 2. Mollusca und Arthropoda. Verlag von R. Oldenbourg, München und Leipzig.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1890. The Tertiary Insects of North America. Report of the United States Geological Survey of the Territories, 13:1–734.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. F. 1836. Illustrations of British entomology; or, a synopsis of indigenous insects: containing their generic and specific distinctions; with an account of their metamorphoses, times of appearance, localities, food, economy. Mandibulata, Vol. 6. Baldwin and Cradock, London, 240p.Google Scholar
Tauber, C. A. 2010. Revision of Neosuarius, a subgenus of Chrysopodes (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). ZooKeys, 44:1–104.Google Scholar
Tjeder, B. 1966. Neuroptera-Planipennia. The Lace-wings of Southern Africa. 5. Family Chrysopidae, p. 228–534. InHanström, B., Brinck, P., and Rudebec, G.(eds.), South African Animal Life. Vol. 12. Swedish Natural Science Research Council, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Veatch, S. W. and Meyer, H. W. 2008. History of paleontology at the Florissant fossil beds, Colorado, p. 1–18. InMeyer, H. W. and Smith, D. M.(eds.), Paleontology of the upper Eocene Florissant Formation, Colorado. Geological Society of America Special Paper 435.Google Scholar
Wedmann, S. and Makarkin, V. N. 2007. A new genus of Mantispidae (Insecta: Neuroptera) from the Eocene of Germany, with a review of the fossil record and palaeobiogeography of the family. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 149:701–716.Google Scholar
Weitschat, W. 2009. Jäger, Gejagte, Parasiten und Blinde Passagiere—Momentaufnahmen aus dem Bernsteinwald, p. 243–256. InBerning, B. and Podenas, S.(eds.), Amber—Archive of Deep Time. Denisia, 26.Google Scholar
Weitschat, W. and Wichard, W. 1998. Atlas der Pflanzen und Tiere im Baltischen Bernstein. Dr. Friedrich Pfeil Verlag, München, Germany, 256p.Google Scholar
Weitschat, W. and Wichard, W. 2010. Baltic amber, p. 80–115. InPenney, D.(ed.), Biodiversity of fossils in amber from the major world deposits. Siri Scientific Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
Wehr, W. C. and Barksdale, L. L. 1996. A checklist of fossil insects from Republic, Washington. Washington Geology, 24 (2):29.Google Scholar
Willmann, R. 1993. Insekten aus der Fur-Formation von Dänemark (Moler, ob. Paleozän/unt. Eozän?). 8. Zwei neue Vertreter der Chrysopidae (Neuroptera). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte, 1993 (4):239–245.Google Scholar
Willmann, R. and Brooks, S. J. 1991. Insekten aus der Fur-Formation von Dänemark (Moler, ob. Paleozän/unt. Eozän?). 6. Chrysopidae (Neuroptera). Meyniana, 43:125–135.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. A., Gregory-Wodzicki, K. M., Molnar, P., and Mustoe, G. 2003. Rapid uplift and then collapse in the Eocene of the Okanagan? Evidence from paleobotany. Geological Association of Canada–Mineralogical Association of Canada–Society Economic Geologists, Joint Annual Meeting. Abstracts 28, abstract no. 533 (CD-ROM.)Google Scholar
Yang, C. and Hong, Y. 1990. Drakochrysa, an Early Cretaceous new genus of Chrysopidae (Insecta: Neuroptera) from Laiyang Basin, Shandong province. Geoscience, 4 (4):15–26.Google Scholar