Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The ‘Deserving’ and the ‘Undeserving’: Practice in an Urban, Local Social Security Office*

  • L.E.A. Howe (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

This article describes the processes of assessment and administration of certain aspects of the supplementary benefit scheme in a social security office in Northern Ireland. Based on evidence obtained observing staff-claimant interaction and interviews with over fifty unemployed claimants, the analysis attempts to demonstrate that a combination of resource constraints, staff attitudes and beliefs, and claimant tactics gives rise to practices which sustain and reproduce the categories ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ at the very same time that staff insist that such practices are actually intended to vitiate this distinction.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Fraser (1973), The Evolution of the British Welfare State, Macmillan, London.

M. Hill (1969), ‘The exercise of discretion in the National Assistance Board’, Public Administration, 47, 7590.

M. Hill (1981), Understanding Social Policy. Martin Robertson, Oxford.

M. Rein (1983), From Policy to Practice, Macmillan, London.

D.J. Smith (1980), ‘How unemployment makes the poor poorer’, Policy Studies, 1, 20–6. Supplementary Benefits Commission (1978), Take-up of Supplementary Benefits, SBC Administrative Papers No. 7, HMSO, London.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×