Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-mzfmx Total loading time: 0.209 Render date: 2022-08-14T10:25:45.076Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

A Smithean Perspective on Increasing Returns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

James M. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Center for Study of Public Choice, Buchanan House MS 1E6, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
Yong J. Yoon
Affiliation:
Center for Study of Public Choice, Buchanan House MS 1E6, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.

Extract

Despite its recent re-emergence to analytical importance, the phenomenon of increasing returns remains outside the central core of neoclassical economics. The history of this idea (or set of ideas) might have been quite different if Adam Smith's explanation of the origins of trade had not been replaced by that of David Ricardo. To Adam Smith, mutually beneficial exchange emerges because of specialization, which, in its turn, implies the presence of increasing returns to the size of the exchange nexus. Even in a world of equals, trade offers mutuality of gain. There is no need for participants in the economic nexus to differ one from another. In the Ricardian logic, by contrast, trade presumably emerges because productive resources differ in their capacities to create economic value, at least among separate “goods.” Specialization is a “natural” feature of resource endowments—a feature that is exploited by trade. Comparative advantage ensures the mutuality of gain. But, in this explanation, there is no direct linkage between the size of the exchange network and the degree of specialization that is viable. There is no need to introduce increasing returns. Comparative advantage may be present even if there are constant returns to scale, both for the economy and for its separate productive sectors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, W. Brian. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borland, Jeffrey I. and Yang, Xiaokai. 1992. “Specialization and a New Approach to Economic Organization and Growth.” American Economic Review 82 (05): 386–91.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1992. “The Supply of Labour and the Extent of the Market.” In Fry, Michael, ed., Adam Smith's Legacy: His Place in the Development of Modern Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. and Yoon, Yong J., eds. 1994a. Return to Increasing Returns. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James M. and Yoon, Yong J., eds. 1994b. “Increasing Returns, Parametric Work-Supply Adjustment, and the Work Ethic.” In Return to Increasing Returns. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James M. and Yoon, Yong J.. 1995. “Constitutional Implications of Alternative Models of Increasing Returns.” Constitutional Political Economy 6 (Winter): 193–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James M. and Yoon, Yong J.. 1999. “Generalized Increasing Returns, Euler's Theorem, and Competitive Equilibrium.” History of Political Economy 31 (Fall): 511–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlin, Edward H. 1933. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash K. and Stiglitz, Joseph. 1977. “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity.” American Economic Review 67 (06): 297308.Google Scholar
Ethier, Wilfred J. 1982. “National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade.” American Economic Review 72 (06): 389405.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. Marcus. 1955. “External Economies and the Doctrine of Balanced Growth.” Economic Journal 65 (06): 241–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1972. “The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics.” Economic Journal 82 (12): 1237–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1985. “Interregional Trade and Cumulative Causation.” In Economics without Equilibrium, the Okun Lectures. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul R. 1979. “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade.” Journal of International Economics 9 (11): 469–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul R. 1987. “Is Free Trade Passé?Journal of Economic Perspectives 1 (Fall): 131–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul R. 1992. “Does the New Trade Theory Require a New Trade Policy?The World Economy 15 (07): 423–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. Jr. 1988. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22 (07): 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. 1890. Principles of Economics, 9th variorum edn., 2 vols., edited by Guillebaud, C. W.. London: Macmillan, 1961.Google Scholar
Reid, Gavin. 1989. Classical Economic Growth. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David. 1953. The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, vol. 1, The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, edited by Sraffa, Piero. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul. 1987. “Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization.” American Economic Review 77 (05): 5662.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (10): S71102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstein-Rodan, Paul N. 1943. “Problems of Industrialisation of Eastern and South-eastern Europe.” Economic Journal 53 (0609): 202–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and the Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Modern Library edn. New York: Random House, 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, Piero. 1926. “The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions.” Economic Journal 36 (12): 535–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Xiaokai and Ng, Yew-Kwang. 1993. Specialization and Economic Organization: A New Classical Microeconomic Framework. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Yang, Xiaokai and Ng, Siang. 1994. “Specialization and Division of Labor: A Survey.” Department of Banking and Finance and Department of Economics, Monash University, Victoria, Australia, working paper.Google Scholar
Young, Allyn. 1928. “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress.” Economic Journal 38 (12): 527–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A Smithean Perspective on Increasing Returns
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

A Smithean Perspective on Increasing Returns
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

A Smithean Perspective on Increasing Returns
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *