Skip to main content

Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English

  • Molly Babel (a1)

Recent research has been concerned with whether speech accommodation is an automatic process or determined by social factors (e.g. Trudgill 2008). This paper investigates phonetic accommodation in New Zealand English when speakers of NZE are responding to an Australian talker in a speech production task. NZ participants were randomly assigned to either a Positive or Negative group, where they were either flattered or insulted by the Australian. Overall, the NZE speakers accommodated to the speech of the AuE speaker. The flattery/insult manipulation did not influence degree of accommodation, but accommodation was predicted by participants' scores on an Implicit Association Task that measured Australia and New Zealand biases. Participants who scored with a pro-Australia bias were more likely to accommodate to the speech of the AuE speaker. Social biases about how a participant feels about a speaker predicted the extent of accommodation. These biases are, crucially, simultaneously automatic and social. (Speech accommodation, phonetic convergence, New Zealand English, dialect contact)*

Hide All
Adank, Patti; Smits, Roel; & van Hout, Roeland (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(3):99107.
Baayen, R. Harald; Piepenbrock, Richard; & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Babel, Molly (2009). Phonetic and social selectivity in speech accommodation. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.
Bauer, Laurie (2008). A question of identity: A response to Trudgill. Language in Society 37:272–73.
Bauer, Laurie; Warren, Paul; Bardsley, Dianne; Kennedy, Marianna; & Major, George (2007). An illustration of the IPA: New Zealand English. Journal of the International Phonetics Association 37(1):97102.
Bayard, Donn (2000). The cultural cringe revisited: Changes through time in Kiwi attitudes toward accents. In Bell, Allan & Kuiper, Koenraad (eds.), New Zealand English, 297324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bell, Allan (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145204.
Bell, Allan (2001). Back in style: Reworking audience design. In Eckert, Penelope & Rickford, John R. (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 139–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boersma, Paul, & Weenink, David (2005). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, version 4.3.29. Online:
Bourhis, Richard Y., & Giles, Howard (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In Giles, Howard (ed.), Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations, 119–36. London: Academic Press.
Chambers, Jack (1992). Dialect acquisition. Language 68:673705.
Coupland, Nikolaus (1980). Style-shifting in a Cardiff work-setting. Language in Society 9:112.
Coupland, Nikolaus (2007). Style: Language variation and identify. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coupland, Nikolaus (2008). The delicate constitution of identity in face-to-face accommodation: A response to Trudgill. Language in Society 37:267–70.
Cox, Felicity, & Palethorpe, Sallyanne (2007). An illustration of the IPA: Australian English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37:341–50.
Delvaux, Véronique, & Soquet, Alain (2007). The influence of ambient speech on adult speech productions through unintentional imitation. Phonetica 64:145–73.
Dijksterhuis, Ap, & Bargh, John A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In Zanna, Mark (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 33, 140. San Diego: Academic Press.
Easton, Anita, & Bauer, Laurie (2000). An acoustic study of the vowels of New Zealand English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 20(2):93117.
Eckert, Penelope, & Rickford, John R. (2001). Style and sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, Bronwen G., & Iverson, Paul (2007). Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121:3814–26.
Giles, Howard (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15:87105.
Giles, Howard, & Coupland, Nikolas (1991). Language: Contexts and consequences. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Giles, Howard; Coupland, Nikolas; & Coupland, Justine (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Giles, Howard, Coupland, Justine, & Coupland, Nikolas (eds.), Contexts of accommodation, 168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldinger, Stephen D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105:251–79.
Goldinger, Stephen D., & Azuma, Tamiko (2004). Episodic memory in printed word naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11:716–22.
Greenwald, Anthony G.; McGhee, Debbie E.; & Schwartz, Jordan L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74:1464–80.
Greenwald, Anthony G.; Nosek, Brian A.; & Banaji, Mahzarin R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85:197216.
Harrington, Jonathan (2006). An acoustic analysis of ‘happy-tensing’ in the Queen's Christmas broadcasts. Journal of Phonetics 34:439–57.
Harrington, Jonathan (2007). Evidence for a relationship between synchronic variability and diachronic change in the Queen's annual Christmas broadcasts. In Cole, Jennifer & Hualde, José I. (eds.), Laboratory phonology 9: Phonetics and phonology, 125–44. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Harrington, Jonathan; Palethrope, Sallyanne; & Watson, Catherine I. (2000a). Does the Queen speak the Queen's English? Nature 408:927–28.
Harrington, Jonathan; Palethrope, Sallyanne; & Watson, Catherine I. (2000b.) Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: An acoustic analysis of the Queen's Christmas broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 30:6378.
Hay, Jennifer; Nolan, Aaron; & Drager, Katie (2006). From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review 23:351–79.
Hay, Jennifer; Warren, Paul; & Drager, Katie (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics 34:458–84.
Holmes, Janet, & Kerswill, Paul (2008). Contact is not enough: A response to Trudgill. Language in Society 37:273–77.
Lobanov, B. (1971) Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49:606–8.
Maclagan, Margaret, & Hay, Jennifer (2007). Getting fed up with our feet: Contrast maintenance and the New Zealand English “short” front vowel shift. Language Variation and Change 19:125.
Mufwene, Salikoko S. (2008). Colonization, population contacts, and the emergence of new language varieties: A response to Trudgill. Language in Society 37:254–58.
Munro, Murray J.; Derwing, Tracey M.; & Flege, James E. (1999). Canadians in Alabama: A perceptual study of dialect acquisition in adults. Journal of Phonetics 27:385403.
Namy, Laura L.; Nygaard, Lynne C.; & Sauerteig, Denise (2002). Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21:422–32.
Nielsen, Kuniko (2008). The specificity of allophonic variability and its implications for accounts of speech perception. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.
Pardo, Jennifer S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119:2382–93.
Payne, Arvilla C. (1980). Factors controlling the acquisition of the Philadelphia dialect by out-of-state children. In Labov, William (ed.), Locating language in time and space, 179218. New York: Academic Press.
Pickering, Martin J., & Garrod, Simon (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:169226.
Schneider, Edgar W. (2008). Accommodation versus identity? A response to Trudgill. Language in Society 37:262–67.
Schneider, Walter; Eschman, Amy; & Zuccolotto, Anthony (2007). E-Prime: User's Guide, version 2.0. Psychology Software Tools.
Shepard, Carolyn A.; Giles, Howard; & LePoire, Beth A. (2001). Communication accommodation theory. In Robinson, W. Peter & Giles, Howard (eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology, 3356. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Shockley, Kevin; Sabadini, Laura; & Fowler, Carol A. (2004). Imitation in shadowing words. Perception & Psychophysics 66:422–29.
Trudgill, Peter (1981). Linguistic accommodation: Sociolinguistic observations on a sociopsychological theory. In Hendrick, Roberta, Masek, Carrie, & Miller, Mary Frances (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, 218–37. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Trudgill, Peter (1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
Trudgill, Peter (2008). Colonial dialect contact in the history of European languages: On the irrelevance of identity in new-dialect formation. Language in Society 37:241–80.
Tuten, Donald N. (2008). Identity formation and accommodation: Sequential and simultaneous relations. Language in Society 37:259–62.
Watson, Catherine; Harrington, Jonathan; & Evans, Zoe (1998). An acoustic comparison between New Zealand and Australian English vowels. Australian Journal of Linguistics 18:185207.
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language in Society
  • ISSN: 0047-4045
  • EISSN: 1469-8013
  • URL: /core/journals/language-in-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score