Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T04:35:35.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2008

Tracey M. Derwing
University of Alberta,
Murray J. Munro
Simon Fraser University,


One of the most salient aspects of speech is accent – either dialectal differences attributable to region or class, or phonological variations resulting from L1 influence on the L2. Our primary concern is with the latter, because of the strong social, psychological, and communicative consequences of speaking with an L2 accent. The decline of audiolingualism led to a concomitant marginalization of pronunciation research and teaching. It was believed that pronunciation instruction could not be effective, in part because of the unrealistic goal of native-like speech in L2 learners, and also because of research findings that suggested that instruction had a negligible impact on oral production. The recent revival of interest in pronunciation research has brought a change of focus away from native-like models toward easy intelligibility. The effects of this change have yet to be fully realized in L2 classrooms. However, many L2 students themselves are keenly interested in pronunciation instruction, a fact not lost on individuals who have recognized a lucrative marketing niche in ‘accent reduction/elimination’ programs that may do more harm than good. Our presentation will relate the core issues of intelligibility, identity, social evaluation, and discrimination to appropriate pronunciation pedagogy for L2 learners.

Plenary Speeches
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Breitkreutz, J., Derwing, T. M. & Rossiter, M. J. (2002). Pronunciation teaching practices in Canada. TESL Canada Journal 19, 5161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. (1991). Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. In Brown, A. (ed.), Teaching English pronunciation: A book of readings. London: Routledge, 211224.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. & Spencer, S. (2000). Phonology and pronunciation in integrated language teaching and teacher education. System 28, 191215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1987). Phonetics and the teaching of pronunciation: A systemic description of English phonology. In Morley (ed.), 878–100.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M. & Goodwin, J. M. (1996). Teaching pronunciation: A reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, S. (2000). Men's voices and women's choices. Animal Behavior 60, 773780.Google ScholarPubMed
Couper, G. (2003). The value of an explicit pronunciation syllabus in ESOL teaching. Prospect 18.3, 5370.Google Scholar
Couper, G. (2006). The short and long-term effects of pronunciation instruction. Prospect 21, 4666.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M. (2003). What do ESL students say about their accents? Canadian Modern Language Review 59, 547566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M. (2008). Curriculum issues in teaching pronunciation to second language learners. In Hansen Edwards & Zampini (eds.), 347–369.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly 39, 379397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics 29, 359380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J. & Wiebe, G. E. (1997). Pronunciation instruction for ‘fossilized’ learners: Can it help? Applied Language Learning 8, 217235.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J. & Wiebe, G. E. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning 48, 393410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M. & Rossiter, M. J. (2003). The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2-accented speech. Applied Language Learning 13, 118.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J. & Munro, M. J. (2002). Teaching native speakers to listen to foreign-accented speech. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 23, 245259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eades, D., Fraser, H., Siegel, J., McNamara, T. & Baker, B. (2003). Linguistic identification in the determination of nationality: A preliminary report. Language Policy 2, 179199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esling, J. & Wong, R. (1983). Voice quality settings and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly 17, 8994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1984). The detection of French accent by American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76, 692707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E. (1988). The production and perception of foreign language speech sounds. In Winitz, H. (ed.), Human communication and its disorders, a review – 1988. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 224401.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23, 527552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. & Varonis, E. M. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning 34, 6589.Google Scholar
Gatbonton, E., Trofimovich, P. & Magid, M. (2005). Learners’ ethnic group affiliation and L2 pronunciation accuracy: A sociolinguistic investigation. TESOL Quarterly 39, 489511.Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. B. (1984). Clear speech: Pronunciation and listening comprehension in North American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Golombek, P. & Rehn Jordan, S. (2005). Becoming ‘black lambs’ not ‘parrots’: A poststructuralist orientation to intelligibility and identity. TESOL Quarterly 39, 513533.Google Scholar
Griffen, T. (1980). A nonsegmental approach to the teaching of pronunciation. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée 54, 8194.Google Scholar
Hahn, L. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly 38, 201223.Google Scholar
Hansen Edwards, J. G. & Zampini, M. L. (eds.) (2008). Phonology and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacDonald, S. (2002). Pronunciation – views and practices of reluctant teachers. Prospect 17.3, 318.Google Scholar
Major, R. C. (2007). Identifying a foreign accent in an unfamiliar language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29, 539556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, J. (ed.) (1987). Current perspectives on pronunciation: Practices anchored in theory. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J. (2003). A primer on accent discrimination in the Canadian context. TESL Canada Journal 20.2, 3851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J. (2008). Foreign accent and speech intelligibility. In Hansen Edwards & Zampini (eds.), 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 45, 7397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T. M. (1998). The effects of speech rate on the comprehensibility of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning 48, 159182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T. M. (2001). Modelling perceptions of the comprehensibility and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23, 451468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T. M. (2006). The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System 34, 520531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T. M. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning 58, 479502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M. & Burgess, C. S. (2003). The detection of foreign accent in backwards speech. In Solé, M. J., Recasens, D. & Romero, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 15). Barcelona: Futurgraphic, 535538.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. M. (1997). Phonology courses offered by MATESOL programs in the US. TESOL Quarterly 31, 741761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, M. C. (1996). Phonology in English language teaching. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Pica, T. (1994). Questions from the language classroom: Research perspectives. TESOL Quarterly 28, 4979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. (2002). Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6, 179206.Google Scholar
Porter, D. & Garvin, S. (1989). Attitudes to pronunciation in EFL. Speak Out! 5, 815.Google Scholar
Riney, T. J. & Flege, J. E. (1998). Changes over time in global foreign accent and liquid identifiability and accuracy. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, 213243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D. L. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 33, 511531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scovel, T. (1988). A time to speak: A psycholinguistic investigation into the critical period for human speech. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Timmis, I. (2002). Native-speaker norms and International English: A classroom view. ELT Journal 56, 240249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P. & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zielinski, B. W. (2008). The listener: No longer the silent partner in reduced intelligibility. System 36, 6984.Google Scholar