Skip to main content Accessibility help

Evolution and Structure of the Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management

  • François Diaz-Maurin (a1) (a2), Hilary C. Sun (a3), Jerold Yu (a3) and Rodney C. Ewing (a1) (a4)


The final disposal of nuclear waste is at the interface between the technologies of the nuclear fuel cycle that produce the waste and the natural hydrologic and geochemical cycles of geologic repositories. Despite this broad interdisciplinary scope, nuclear waste management, as practiced, remains “balkanized” among the relevant disciplines. The individual subdisciplines continue to work in relative isolation from one another: materials science dealing with the immobilization of nuclear waste; engineering science dealing with the design, construction and operation of the repository; geoscience dealing with the long-term behavior of host rocks and the hydrology; health science dealing with the effects of radiation; social sciences dealing with the issues of trust, risk and ethics. Understanding how these very different disciplines interact is fundamental to creating and managing a nuclear waste organization. Based on a comprehensive review of the scholarly and scientific literature of waste management, we have analyzed the evolution and structure of research in nuclear waste management between 1979 and 2017. Focusing on materials science, we show that some research themes have been isolated from the most central themes of nuclear waste management. Moreover, we observed a relative decline of the fundamental research in materials science. This decline was evidenced by a drop in the number of articles published in the proceedings of the MRS symposia “Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management” since 2000. We argue for the need to more precisely and inclusively define the field of nuclear waste management.


Corresponding author


Hide All
1.Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future, Report to the Secretary of Energy (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2012).
2.McCarthy, G.J., Schwoebel, R.L., Potter, R.W., Friedman, A.M., Moore, J.G., Burkholder, H.C., and Lutze, W., editors, Proceedings of the Symposium on “Science Underlying Radioactive Waste Management I”, Materials Research Society Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, November 28-December 1, 1978 (Springer-Verlag US, 1979).
3.Hirsch, J.E., PNAS 102, 16569 (2005).
4.Iglesias, J.E. and Pecharromán, C., Scientometrics 73, 303 (2007).
5.Cobo, M.J., López-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., and Herrera, F., Journal of Informetrics 5, 146 (2011).
6.Högselius, P., Energy Policy 37, 254 (2009).
7.Diaz-Maurin, F. and Ewing, R.C., Sustainability 10, 4390 (2018).
8.Reset Steering Committee, “Reset” of America’s Nuclear Waste Management Strategy and Policy (Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2018).


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Evolution and Structure of the Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management

  • François Diaz-Maurin (a1) (a2), Hilary C. Sun (a3), Jerold Yu (a3) and Rodney C. Ewing (a1) (a4)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.