Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Looking Back at Milošević’s Antibureaucratic Revolution: What Do Ordinary Participants Now Think of Their Involvement?

  • Marko Grdešić (a1)

Abstract

Most scholarship on Serbia’s antibureaucratic revolution of the late 1980s has emphasized elite actors while ignoring the motivations of ordinary participants. How do ordinary people describe their involvement? Moreover, given the antibureaucratic revolution’s dark side—such as exclusionary nationalism and political authoritarianism—it is important to investigate whether participants are willing to critically engage their personal political histories. What do they now say about their roles in this episode? In order to provide answers to this question, six focus groups with a total of 34 participants were organized in the town of Novi Sad, the location of one of the best-known rallies of the antibureaucratic revolution, the so-called yogurt revolution. Most people see their involvement in a rather negative way and regret taking part. However, two blind spots also appear that lessen their sense of personal responsibility: conspiracy theories and notions of urban superiority. The former shifts blame onto secret forces and the latter onto nonurban outsiders. Overall, the long-term legacies of the antibureaucratic revolution are negative: they are associated with cynicism and apathy.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Looking Back at Milošević’s Antibureaucratic Revolution: What Do Ordinary Participants Now Think of Their Involvement?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Looking Back at Milošević’s Antibureaucratic Revolution: What Do Ordinary Participants Now Think of Their Involvement?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Looking Back at Milošević’s Antibureaucratic Revolution: What Do Ordinary Participants Now Think of Their Involvement?
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email: grdesic@wisc.edu

References

Hide All
Archer, Rory. 2018. “‘It Was Better When It Was Worse’: Blue-Collar Narratives of the Recent Past in Belgrade.” Social History 43 (1): 3055.
Archer, Rory, and Musić, Goran. 2017. “Approaching the Socialist Factory and Its Workforce: Considerations from Fieldwork in (Former) Yugoslavia.” Labor History 58 (1): 4466.
Banaji, Mahzarin R., and Greenwald, Anthony G.. 2016. Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People. New York: Bantam Books.
Banjeglav, Tamara. 2013. “Dealing with the Past in Post-War Croatia: Perceptions, Problems, and Perspectives.” In Transitional Justice and Civil Society in the Balkans, edited by Simić, Olivera and Volčić, Zala, 3350. New York: Springer.
Bennett, Christopher. 1995. Yugoslavia’s Bloody Collapse: Causes, Course and Consequences. New York: New York University Press.
Blanuša, Nebojša. 2011. Teorije zavjera i hrvatska politička zbilja 1980–2007. Zagreb: Plejada.
Bloor, Michael, Frankland, Jane, Thomas, Michelle, and Robson, Kate. 2001. Focus Groups in Social Research. London: Sage.
Cohen, Lenard J. 2001. Serpent in the Bosom: The Rise and Fall of Slobodan Milošević. Boulder: Westview Press.
Ćorkalo, Dinka, Ajduković, Dejan, Weinstein, Harvey, and Biro, Mikos. 2004. “Neighbors Again? Intercommunity Relations after Ethnic Cleansing.” In My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, edited by Eric Stover and Harvey Weinstein , 143161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doderović, Milorad. 1990. Kako se dogodio Šolević. Niš, Serbia: Gradina.
Dragović-Soso, Jasna. 2002. Saviours of the Nation: Serbia’s Intellectual Opposition and the Revival of Nationalism. London: Hurst.
Dragović-Soso, Jasna. 2008. “Why Did Yugoslavia Disintegrate? An Overview of Contending Explanations.” In State Collapse in South-Eastern Europe: New Perspectives on Yugoslavia’s Disintegration, edited by Cohen, Lenard and Dragović-Soso, Jasna, 139. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
Ekiert, Grzegorz. 1996. State against Society: Political Crises and Their Aftermath in East Central Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Giugni, Marco. 1998. “Was it Worth the Effort? The Outcomes of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 371393.
Giugni, Marco. 2007. “Personal and Biographical Consequences.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 489507. Malden: Blackwell.
Glaurdić, Josip. 2011. Vrijeme Europe: Zapadne sile i raspad Jugoslavije. Zagreb, Croatia: Mate.
Gordy, Eric. 2014. Guilt, Responsibility, and Denial: The Past at Stake in Post-Milošević Serbia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Grdešić, Marko. 2016. “Serbia’s Anti-Bureaucratic Revolution as Manipulation? A Cultural Alternative to the Elite-Centric Approach.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 58 (3): 774803.
Hennink, Monique. 2007. International Focus Group Research: A Handbook for the Health and Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hetland, Gabriel. 2014. “The Crooked Line: From Populist Mobilization to Participatory Democracy in Chavez-Era Venezuela.” Qualitative Sociology 37 (4): 373401.
Jansen, Robert. 2011. “Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism.” Theory and Society 29 (2): 7596.
Jansen, Robert. 2017. Revolutionizing Repertoires: The Rise of Populist Mobilization in Peru. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jansen, Stef. 2005a. Antinacionalizam: Etnografija otpora u Beogradu i Zagrebu. Belgrade: XX Vek.
Jansen, Stef, 2005b. “Who’s Afraid of White Socks? Towards a Critical Understanding of Post-Yugoslav Urban Self-Perceptions.” Ethnologia Balkanica 9: 151167.
Jović, Dejan. 2009. Yugoslavia: A State That Withered Away. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
Jović, Dejan. 2014. “1989: Godina koja nam se nije dogodila.” Politička misao. December 7. http://politickamisao.com/1989-godina-koja-nam-se-nije-dogodila/. (Accessed February 16, 2019.)
Kaplan, Robert. 1994. Balkan Ghosts: A Journey through History. New York: Vintage.
Kojanić, Ognjen. 2015. “Nostalgia as a Practice of the Self in Post-Socialist Serbia.” Canadian Slavonic Papers 57 (3–4): 195212.
Langord, Joe, and McDonagh, Deana. 2003. Focus Groups. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Lekić, Bojana, Pavić, Zoran, and Lekić, Slaviša. 2009. Kako se događao narod (I): Antibirokratska revolucija (1987–1989). Beograd, Serbia: Službeni glasnik.
Little, Allan, and Silber, Laura. 1995. The Death of Yugoslavia. London: Penguin.
McAdam, Doug. 1989. “The Biographical Consequences of Activism.” American Sociological Review 54 (5): 744760.
McAdam, Doug. 1990. Freedom Summer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morgan, David. 1996. “Focus Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 129152.
Morgan, David, and Krueger, Rirchard. 1993. “When to Use Focus Groups and Why.” In Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art, edited by David Morgan , 319. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Mouzelis, Nicos. 1985. “On the Concept of Populism: Populist and Clientelist Modes of Incorporation in Semiperipheral Polities.” Politics and Society 14 (3): 329348.
Musić, Goran. 2016. “‘They Came as Workers and Returned as Serbs’: The Role of Rakovica’s Blue-Collar Workers in Serbian Social Mobilizations of the Late 1980s.” In Social Inequalities and Discontent in Yugoslav Socialism, edited by Archer, Rory, Duda, Igor, and Stubbs, Paul, 132154. Farnham: Routledge.
Nettelfield, Lara J. 2010. State, Courting Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Hague Tribunal’s Impact in a Postwar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Obradović-Wochnik, Jelena. 2013. Ethnic Conflict and War Crimes in the Balkans: The Narratives of Denial in Post-Conflict Serbia. London: I. B. Tauris.
Pavlaković, Vjeran. 2010. “Croatia, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, and General Gotovina as a Political Symbol.” Europe-Asia Studies 62 (10): 17071740.
Pavlowitch, Stevan K. 2002. Serbia: The History behind the Name. London: Hurst.
Petrović, Tanja. 2010. “When We Were Europe: Socialist Workers in Serbia and their Nostalgic Narratives.” In Remembering Communism: Genres of Representation, edited by Todorova, Maria, 127153. New York: Social Science Research Council.
Puchta, Claudia, and Potter, Jonathan. 2004. Focus Group Practice. London: Sage.
Ramet, Sabrina P. 2005. Thinking about Yugoslavia: Scholarly Debates about the Yugoslav Breakup and the Wars in Bosnia and Kosovo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sokolić, Ivor. 2016. “Researching Norms, Narratives, and Transitional Justice: Focus Group Methodology in Post-Conflict Croatia.” Nationalities Papers 44 (6): 932949.
Spasić, Ivana. 2006. “Asfalt: The Construction of Urbanity in Everyday Discourse in Serbia.” Ethnologia Balkanica 17 (10): 211227.
Stewart, David W., and Shamdasani, Prem N.. 2015. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Vladisavljević, Nebojša. 2008. Serbia’s Antibureaucratic Revolution: Milošević, the Fall of Communism and Nationalist Mobilization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vladisavljević, Nebojš. 2019. “The Anti-Bureaucratic Revolution in an Age of Protest: Comparison across Time and Space,Nationalities Papers 47 (4): 545561.
Vujačić, Veljko. 1996. “Historical Legacies, Nationalist Mobilization, and Political Outcomes in Russia and Serbia: A Weberian View.” Theory and Society 25 (6): 763801.
Vujačić, Veljko. 2004. “Reexamining the ‘Serbian Exceptionalism’ Thesis.” Working Paper, Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies. http://iseees.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/u4/bps_/publications_/2004_03-vuja.pdf
Vujačić, Veljko. 2003. “From Class to Nation: Left, Right, and the Ideological and Institutional Roots of Post-Communist ‘National Socialism.’East European Politics and Societies 17 (3): 359392.
Vujačić, Veljko. 2015. Nationalism, Myth and the State in Russia and Serbia: Antecedents of the Dissolution of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Živković, Marko, 1997. “Violent Highlanders and Peaceful Lowlanders: Uses and Abuses of Ethno-Geography in the Balkans from Versailles to Dayton” In Ambiguous Identities in the New Europe, edited by Miklós Hadas and Miklós Vörös. Budapest: Replika Kö.
Živković, Marko. 2012. Srpski sanovnik: Nacionalni imaginarijum u vreme Miloševića. Belgrade: XX Vek.

Keywords

Looking Back at Milošević’s Antibureaucratic Revolution: What Do Ordinary Participants Now Think of Their Involvement?

  • Marko Grdešić (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed