Skip to main content
×
×
Home

A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity

  • Hugo J. Rainey (a1), Edward H. B. Pollard (a1), Guy Dutson (a1), Jonathan M. M. Ekstrom (a1), Suzanne R. Livingstone (a1), Helen J. Temple (a1) and John D. Pilgrim (a1)...
Abstract

Increased recognition of the business case for managing corporate impacts on the environment has helped drive increasingly detailed and quantified corporate environmental goals. Foremost among these are goals of no net loss (NNL) and net positive impact (NPI). We assess the scale and growth of such corporate goals. Since the first public, company-wide NNL/NPI goal in 2001, 32 companies have set similar goals, of which 18 specifically include biodiversity. Mining companies have set the most NNL/NPI goals, and the majority of those that include biodiversity, despite the generally lower total global impact of the mining industry on biodiversity compared to the agriculture or forestry industries. This could be linked to the mining industry's greater participation in best practice bodies, high-profile impacts, and higher profit margins per area of impact. The detail and quality of present goals vary widely. We examined specific NNL/NPI goals and assessed the extent to which their key components were likely to increase the effectiveness of these goals in benefiting biodiversity and managing business risk. Nonetheless, outcomes are more important than goals, and we urge conservationists to work with companies to both support and monitor their efforts to achieve increasingly ambitious environmental goals.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail hugo.rainey@thebiodiversityconsultancy.com
References
Hide All
Athanas, A. (2005) The role of business in biodiversity and impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23, 2935.
BBOP (Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme) (2012a) Guidance Notes to the Standard on Biodiversity Offsets. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme, Washington, DC, USA.
BBOP (Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme) (2012b) Resource Paper: No Net Loss and Loss–Gain Calculations in Biodiversity Offsets. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme, Washington, DC, USA.
Bull, J.W., Suttle, K.B., Gordon, A., Singh, N.J. & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2013) Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice. Oryx, 47, 369380.
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B. et al. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253260.
Edwards, D.P. & Laurance, S.G. (2012) Green labelling, sustainability and the expansion of tropical agriculture: critical issues for certification schemes. Biological Conservation, 151, 6064.
Equator Principles (2012) Equator Principles. Http://www.equator-principles.com/ [accessed 24 October 2012].
Fisher-Vanden, K. & Thorburn, K.S. (2011) Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives and shareholder wealth. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62, 430445.
Fortune (2012) Fortune Global 500 companies. Fortune, 23 July 2012. Http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/2012/full_list/ [accessed 30 November 2012].
Gardner, T.A., von Hase, A., Brownlie, S., Ekstrom, J.M.M., Pilgrim, J.D., Savy, C.E. et al. (2013) Biodiversity offsets and the challenge of achieving no net loss. Conservation Biology, 27, 12541264.
Google (2012) Http://www.google.co.uk [accessed 1 March–30 June 2012].
Gunningham, N. (2007) Mine Safety: Law Regulation Policy. Federation Press, Annandale, Australia.
Hanson, C., Ranganathan, J., Iceland, C. & Finisdore, J. (2012) The Corporate Ecosystem Services Review: Guidelines for Identifying Business Risks and Opportunities Arising from Ecosystem Change. Version 2.0. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Hill, D. & Arnold, R. (2012) Building the evidence base for ecological impact assessment and mitigation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 69.
Houdet, J., Tommetter, M. & Weber, J. (2012) Understanding changes in business strategies regarding biodiversity and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 73, 3746.
IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment) (2005) Biodiversity in Impact Assessment. Special Publication Series No. 3. International Association for Impact Assessment, Fargo, USA.
ICMM (International Council on Mining and Minerals) (2006) Good Practice Guidance for Mining and Biodiversity. International Council on Mining and Minerals, London, UK.
ICMM (International Council on Mining and Minerals) (2010) Mining and Biodiversity: A Collection of Case Studies. International Council on Mining and Minerals, London, UK.
IFC (International Finance Corporation) (2012) Performance Standard 6. Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources. January 1, 2012. International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC, USA. Http://www1.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/IFC+Sustainability/Sustainability+Framework/Sustainability+Framework+-+2012/Performance+Standards+and+Guidance+Notes+2012/ [accessed 10 May 2012].
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species v. 2012.1. Http://www.iucnredlist.org/ [accessed 3 October 2012].
Laurance, W.F., Koh, L.P., Butler, R., Sodhi, N.S., Bradshaw, C.J.A., Neidel, J.D. et al. (2010) Improving the performance of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil for nature conservation. Conservation Biology, 24, 377381.
Lavallée, S. & Plouffe, S. (2004) The ecolabel and sustainable development. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9, 349354.
Madsen, B., Carroll, N., Kandy, D. & Bennett, G. (2011) Update: State of Biodiversity Markets. Forest Trends, Washington, DC, USA. Http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_2848.pdf [accessed 3 June 2012].
Maron, M., Hobbs, R.J., Moilanen, A., Matthews, J.W., Christie, K., Gardner, T.A. et al. (2012) Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biological Conservation, 155, 141148.
Martin, T.G., Nally, S., Burbridge, A.A., Arnall, S., Garnett, S.T., Hayward, M.W. et al. (2012) Acting fast helps avoid extinction. Conservation Letters, 5, 274280.
McKenney, B.A. & Kiesecker, J.M. (2010) Policy development for biodiversity offsets: a review of offset frameworks. Environmental Management, 45, 165176.
Morgera, E. (2012) From Corporate Social Responsibility to Accountability Mechanisms: The Role of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper Series. University of Edinburgh, UK.
Pedroni, P.M., Jaramillo, H., Torres, C.M. de L., Navarrete, Z.H., Bernal-Ramirez, J. & Reed, T. (2013) A partnership approach to addressing applied ecological research needs of an oil and gas business. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 539543.
Pilgrim, J.D., Brownlie, S., Ekstrom, J.M.M., Gardner, T.A., von Hase, A., ten Kate, K. et al. (2013) A process for assessing offsetability of biodiversity impacts. Conservation Letters, 6, 376384.
PWC (PricewaterhouseCoopers) (2010) Biodiversity and Business Risk. PWC, London, UK, and World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland.
Quintero, J.D. & Mathur, A. (2011) Biodiversity offsets and infrastructure. Conservation Biology, 25, 11211123.
Ramirez-Llodra, E., Tyler, P.A., Baker, M.C., Bergstad, O.A., Clark, M.R., Elva, E. et al. (2011) Man and the last great wilderness: human impact on the deep sea. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e22588.
Rio Tinto (2008) Rio Tinto and Biodiversity. Rio Tinto, London, UK.
Robinson, J.G. (1993) The limits to caring: sustainable living and the loss of biodiversity. Conservation Biology, 7, 2028.
Robinson, J.G. (2011) Corporate greening: is it significant for biodiversity conservation? Oryx, 45, 309310.
Robinson, J.G. (2012) Common and conflicting interests in the engagements between conservation organizations and corporations. Conservation Biology, 26, 967977.
Schindler, D.W. & Lee, P.G. (2010) Comprehensive conservation planning to protect biodiversity and ecosystem services in Canadian boreal regions under a warming climate and increasing exploitation. Biological Conservation, 143, 15711586.
Slack, K. (2012) Mission impossible?: adopting a CSR-based business model for extractive industries in developing countries. Resources Policy, 37, 179184.
Solid Energy (2004) Environmental Policy Statement. Solid Energy, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Stern, D. (2006) Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. HM Treasury, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity) (2010) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. Http://www.teebweb.org/publication/mainstreaming-the-economics-of-nature-a-synthesis-of-the-approach-conclusions-and-recommendations-of-teeb/ [accessed 10 May 2012].
UNEP–WCMC (2011) Review of the Biodiversity Requirements of Standards and Certification Schemes: A Snapshot of Current Practices. Technical Series No. 63. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada.
United Nations Global Compact (2012) The Ten Principles of the United Nations Global Compact. Http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/index.html [accessed 10 December 2012].
Walker, S., Brower, A.L., Stephens, R.T.T. & Lee, W.G. (2009) Why bartering biodiversity fails. Conservation Letters, 2, 149157.
Warhurst, A. (2001) Corporate citizenship and corporate social investment. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1, 5773.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Rainey Supplementary Material
Table S1

 PDF (61 KB)
61 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed