Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Harnessing local ecological knowledge for conservation decision making via Wisdom of Crowds: the case of the Manus green tree snail Papustyla pulcherrima

  • Nathan Whitmore (a1)

The shell of the Manus green tree snail Papustyla pulcherrima is renowned for its beauty and is subject to international protection under CITES, having been harvested intensively in the past. To determine its threat status, and whether further conservation action is justified, an inexpensive Wisdom of Crowds approach was used to estimate the change in relative density of the snail between 1998 and 2013. Local men and women were approached around the main market on Manus Island, Papua New Guinea, and asked to map the relative abundance of the snail on an ordinal scale, based on their personal observations in 2013 and 1998 (a year of cultural significance). The spatial abundance data from 400 surveys were analysed using an information-theoretic approach. A suite of cumulative link models incorporating geographical factors was used to determine the magnitude of the change and to investigate possible biological influences underpinning the reported pattern. High abundance of the snail was associated with intact forested areas, high elevation and low population density. A slow decline was evident, with the median percentage of map cells where the snail was categorized as plentiful decreasing by c. 20% between the 2 years. On this basis a categorization of Near Threatened was advocated for the species. Although it is arguable that Wisdom of Crowds methods cannot be substituted for in situ quantification, the approach appears to have utility as a preliminary assessment for further conservation expenditure, and as a tool for determining threat status.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Agresti (2010) Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, USA.

R. Arlinghaus & J. Krause (2013) Wisdom of the crowd and natural resource management. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 811.

M.C. Bottrill , L.N. Joseph , J. Carwardine , M. Bode , C. Cook , E.T. Game (2008) Is conservation triage just smart decision making? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 649654.

P. Cardoso , T.L. Erwin , P.A.V. Borges & T.R. New (2011) The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biological Conservation, 144, 26472655.

A. Davis & J.R. Wagner (2003) Who knows? On the importance of identifying ‘experts’ when researching local ecological knowledge. Human Ecology, 31, 463489.

N.K. Dulvy & N.V.C. Polunin (2004) Using informal knowledge to infer human-induced rarity of a conspicuous reef fish. Animal Conservation, 7, 365374.

F. Galton (1907) Vox populi. Nature, 75, 450451.

M.C. Hansen , P.V. Potapov , R. Moore , M. Hancher , S.A. Turubanova , A. Tyukavina (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342, 850853.

H.P. Huntington (2000) Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecological Applications, 10, 12701274.

K. Jordaens , L. Dillen & T. Backeljau (2007) Effects of mating, breeding system and parasites on reproduction in hermaphrodites: pulmonate gastropods (Mollusca). Animal Biology, 57, 137195.

M.C. Leite & M.A. Gasalla (2013) A method for assessing fishers’ ecological knowledge as a practical tool for ecosystem-based fisheries management: seeking consensus in south-eastern Brazil. Fisheries Research, 145, 4353.

J. Lorenz , H. Rauhut , F. Schweitzer & D. Helbing (2011) How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 90209025.

C. Lydeard , R.H. Cowie , W.F. Ponder , A.E. Bogan , P. Bouchet , S.A. Clark (2004) The global decline of nonmarine mollusks. BioScience, 54, 321330.

T.G. Martin , M.A. Burgman , F. Fidler , P.M. Kuhnert , S. Low-Choy , M. McBride & K. Mengersen (2012) Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conservation Biology, 26, 2938.

M. Nofer & O. Hinz (2014) Are crowds on the internet wiser than experts? The case of a stock prediction community. Journal of Business Economics, 84, 303338.

C.T. Palmer & R.L. Wadley (2007) Local environmental knowledge, talk, and skepticism: using ‘LES’ to distinguish ‘LEK’ from ‘LET’ in Newfoundland. Human Ecology, 35, 749760.

C.M. Raymond , I. Fazey , M.S. Reed , L.C. Stringer , G.M. Robinson & A.C. Evely (2010) Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 17661777.

A. Sáenz-Arroyo , C.M. Roberts , J. Torre & M. Cariño-Olvera (2005) Using fishers’ anecdotes, naturalists’ observations and grey literature to reassess marine species at risk: the case of the Gulf grouper in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Fish and Fisheries, 6, 121133.

C.A. van der Hoeven , W.F. de Boer & H.H. Prins (2004) Pooling local expert opinions for estimating mammal densities in tropical rainforests. Journal for Nature Conservation, 12, 193204.

W.N. Venables & B.D. Ripley (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th edition. Springer, New York, USA.

M.L. Weitzman (1998) The Noah's ark problem. Econometrica, 66, 12791298.

H.B. Wilson , L.N. Joseph , A.L. Moore & H.P. Possingham (2011) When should we save the most endangered species? Ecology Letters, 14, 886890.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 26 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 211 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.