Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Extinct flagships: linking extinct and threatened species

  • Peter M. Kyne (a1) and Vanessa M. Adams (a1)
Abstract

Despite much effort to promote the conservation and recovery of threatened species, the extent of the current list of threatened vertebrates (> 7,600 species) underscores the need to develop novel communication and marketing tools to raise awareness and funding for their conservation. Although flagship species have been widely used in conservation marketing, the flagship role of extinct species has been largely overlooked and the status of lost species is rarely associated with the status of extant species facing a high risk of extinction. Some extinct species (e.g. the dodo Raphus cucullatus and the thylacine Thylacinus cynocephalus) are cultural and commercial icons and therefore familiar, and may appeal to the public as conservation flagships. We propose a wider use of extinct flagships to raise awareness for the conservation of threatened species by making a direct link between already extinct species and extant species at risk of extinction. We present examples of publicly recognized and iconic extinct species that could be used in marketing for the conservation of threatened species. These extinct species are familiar and may be readily linked to threatened species or species groups. We outline a roadmap for testing their appeal under the extinct flagship concept, through market research. If research identifies that a cognitive link is made between the fate of an extinct species (i.e. they went extinct from human causes) and what may happen to threatened species (i.e. they are at risk of extinction from human causes), extinct species may well have a wider role to play as conservation flagships.

Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail peter.kyne@cdu.edu.au
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Also at: The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Alagona, P.S. (2004) Biography of a “feathered pig”: the California condor conservation controversy. Journal of the History of Biology, 37, 557583.
Bennett, J.R., Maloney, R. & Possingham, H.P. (2015) Biodiversity gains from efficient use of private sponsorship for flagship species conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 282, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2693.
Blockstein, D.E. & Evans, D.M. (2014) A century later: lessons learned from the passenger pigeon. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12, 315.
Douglas, L.R. & Winkel, G. (2014) The flipside of the flagship. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23, 979997.
Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust (undated) Https://www.durrell.org/wildlife/ [accessed 7 March 2016].
Fillios, M., Crowther, M.S. & Letnic, M. (2012) The impact of the dingo on the thylacine in Holocene Australia. World Archaeology, 44, 118134.
Halliday, T.R. (1980) The extinction of the passenger pigeon Ectopistes migratorius and its relevance to contemporary conservation. Biological Conservation, 17, 157162.
Heberle, G. (2004) Reports of alleged thylacine sightings in Western Australia. Conservation Science Western Australia, 5, 15.
Hoffmann, M., Hilton-Taylor, C., Angulo, A., Böhm, M., Brooks, T.M., Butchart, S.H.M. et al. (2010) The impact of conservation on the status of the world's vertebrates. Science, 330, 15031509.
Hume, J.P. (2006) The history of the dodo Raphus cucullatus and the penguin of Mauritius. Historical Biology, 18, 6589.
Hung, C.-M., Shaner, P.-J.L., Zink, R.M., Liu, W.-C., Chu, T.-C., Huang, W.-S. & Li, S.-H. (2014) Drastic population fluctuations explain the rapid extinction of the passenger pigeon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 1063610641.
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN (2014a) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species v. 2014.3. Http://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 1 May 2015].
IUCN (2014b) IUCN Red List v. 2014.3: Table 3a: Status category summary by major taxonomic group (animals). Http://www.iucnredlist.org/about/summary-statistics [accessed 1 May 2015].
IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee (2013) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 10. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.
Jepson, P. & Barua, M. (2015) A theory of flagship species action. Conservation and Society, 13, 95104.
Johnson, C. (2006) Australia's Mammal Extinctions: A 50,000 Year History. Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, Australia.
Jones, C.G., Heck, W., Lewis, R.E., Mungroo, Y., Slade, G. & Cade, T. (1995) The restoration of the Mauritius kestrel Falco punctatus population. Ibis, 137, S173S180.
Joseph, L.N., Maloney, R.F., Watson, J.E.M. & Possingham, H.P. (2011) Securing nonflagship species from extinction. Conservation Letters, 4, 324325.
Kamp, J., Oppel, S., Ananin, A.A., Durnev, Y.A., Gashev, S.N., Hölzel, N. et al. (2015) Global population collapse in a superabundant migratory bird and illegal trapping in China. Conservation Biology, 29, 16841694.
Letnic, M., Fillios, M. & Crowther, M.S. (2012) Could direct killing by larger dingoes have caused the extinction of the thylacine from mainland Australia? PLoS ONE, 7(5), e34877.
Paddle, R. (2000) The Last Tasmanian Tiger: The History and Extinction of the Thylacine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Paddle, R. (2012) The thylacine's last straw: epidemic disease in a recent mammalian extinction. Australian Zoologist, 36, 7592.
Project Passenger Pigeon (2012) Http://passengerpigeon.org/ [accessed 8 March 2016].
Roberts, D.L. & Solow, A.R. (2003) Flightless birds: when did the dodo become extinct? Nature, 426, 245.
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F.S. III, Lambin, E.F. et al. (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472475.
Rogers, R.W. & Mewborn, C.R. (1976) Fear appeals and attitude change: effects of a threat's noxiousness, probability of occurrence and the efficacy of coping responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 5461.
Sauer, J.R., Hines, J.E., Fallon, J.E., Pardieck, K.L., Ziolkowski, D.J. Jr & Link, W.A. (2014) The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966–2013. Version 01.30.2015. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, USA.
Smith, R.J., Veríssimo, D. & MacMillan, D.C. (2010) Marketing and conservation: how to lose friends and influence people. In Trade-Offs in Conservation: Deciding What to Save (eds Leader-Williams, N., Adams, W.M. & Smith, R.J.), pp. 215232. Blackwell Publishing, Chichester, UK.
Turner, S.S. (2009) Negotiating nostalgia: the rhetoricity of thylacine representation in Tasmanian tourism. Society & Animals, 17, 97114.
Vasi, I.B. & Macy, M.W. (2003) The mobilizer's dilemma: crisis, empowerment, and collective action. Social Forces, 81, 979998.
Veríssimo, D., MacMillan, D.C. & Smith, R.J. (2011a) Toward a systematic approach for identifying conservation flagships. Conservation Letters, 4, 18.
Veríssimo, D., MacMillan, D.C. & Smith, R.J. (2011b) Marketing diversity: a response to Joseph and colleagues. Conservation Letters, 4, 326327.
Veríssimo, D., Fraser, I., Girão, W., Campos, A.A., Smith, R.J. & MacMillan, D.C. (2014) Evaluating conservation flagships and flagship fleets. Conservation Letters, 7, 263270.
Weinstein, N., Rogerson, M., Moreton, J., Balmford, A. & Bradbury, R.B. (2015) Conserving nature out of fear or knowledge? Using threatening versus connecting messages to generate support for environmental causes. Journal for Nature Conservation, 26, 4955.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed