Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-888d5979f-9v52d Total loading time: 1.355 Render date: 2021-10-27T11:13:47.654Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Protected areas and benthic characteristics influence the distribution of the Vulnerable bumphead parrotfish Bolbometopon muricatum in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Vardhan Patankar*
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, 551, 7th Main Road, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, 2nd Phase, Kodigehalli, Bengaluru, India
Tanmay Wagh
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, 551, 7th Main Road, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, 2nd Phase, Kodigehalli, Bengaluru, India
Aniruddha Marathe
Affiliation:
Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Bengaluru, India
*
(Corresponding author) E-mail vardhanpatankar@gmail.com

Abstract

The Vulnerable bumphead parrotfish Bolbometopon muricatum, a highly prized fishery resource worldwide, has experienced population declines throughout its geographical range. There is limited knowledge of the distribution and abundance of, and threats to, this fish in Indian waters, particularly for the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. To assess the species’ distribution and conservation status we conducted underwater surveys across 75 sites around 51 islands and interviewed 99 fishers across the Andaman and Nicobar archipelago. We recorded a total of 59 individual B. muricatum across nine sites from the northernmost island in the Andamans (Landfall Island) to the southernmost island in the Nicobars (Great Nicobar Island). Interviews revealed that most fishers (100% in Nicobar, 94% in Middle Andaman, 62% in South Andaman) had seen B. muricatum, and knowledge of the species is highest amongst spearfishers. Generalized linear models indicated that presence of marine protected areas and high live coral cover influenced the abundance and distribution of B. muricatum. The species' density seems to be naturally low in the archipelago. We discuss our findings in the light of protecting rare and threatened species, and recommend strengthening the existing marine protected areas in these islands.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna & Flora International 2019

Introduction

Certain fish groups have important functional roles in structuring coral reef ecosystems, including corallivory (Cole et al., Reference Cole, Lawton, Pratchett and Wilson2011), herbivory (Diaz-Pulido & McCook, Reference Diaz-Pulido and McCook2003; Hughes et al., Reference Hughes, Rodrigues, Bellwood, Ceccarelli, Hoegh-guldberg and McCook2007; Burkepile & Hay, Reference Burkepile and Hay2010) and piscivory (Jennings & Polunin, Reference Jennings and Polunin1997; Boaden & Kingsford, Reference Boaden and Kingsford2015). Conservation of such fish groups is a key priority for ecosystem managers (Nyström, Reference Nyström2006; Bellwood et al., Reference Bellwood, Hughes and Hoey2006). One such fish that is also of conservation concern is the bumphead parrotfish Bolbometopon muricatum, the largest herbivorous and corallivorous fish, categorized as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List (Chan et al., Reference Chan, Sadovy and Donaldson2012). An individual can consume up to 5 t of structural reef carbonate per year (Bellwood et al., Reference Bellwood, Hoey and Choat2003), and the species promotes coral growth and recruitment by balancing coral erosion and calcification, preventing macroalgal growth and maintaining sediment flow in the reef ecosystem (Bellwood et al., Reference Bellwood, Hoey and Choat2003, Reference Bellwood, Hoey and Hughes2011; Kobayashi et al., Reference Kobayashi, Friedlander, Grimes, Nichols and Zgliczynski2011; McCauley et al., Reference Mccauley, Young, Guevara, Williams, Power and Dunbar2014; Roff et al., Reference Roff, Doropoulos, Mereb and Mumby2017).

A large body size, aggregating behavior and limited activity at night make B. muricatum an easy target for spearfishers (Bellwood et al., Reference Bellwood, Hoey and Choat2003; Donaldson & Dulvy, Reference Donaldson and Dulvy2004; Kobayashi et al., Reference Kobayashi, Friedlander, Grimes, Nichols and Zgliczynski2011; Chan et al., Reference Chan, Sadovy and Donaldson2012; Munoz et al., Reference Munoz, Zgliczynski, Teer and Laughlin2014; Hamilton et al., Reference Hamilton, Almany, Stevens, Bode, Pita, Peterson and Choat2016). Combined with slow growth and low replacement rates, this has resulted in population declines across the Indo-Pacific and Red Sea (Kobayashi et al., Reference Kobayashi, Friedlander, Grimes, Nichols and Zgliczynski2011; Chan et al., Reference Chan, Sadovy and Donaldson2012; Andrews et al., Reference Andrews, Choat, Hamilton and DeMartini2015). These declines have been particularly marked in the Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Guam, the Marshall Islands and parts of Malaysia and Fiji (Bellwood et al., Reference Bellwood, Hoey and Choat2003; Aswani & Hamilton, Reference Aswani and Hamilton2004; Dulvy & Polunin, Reference Dulvy and Polunin2004). Many countries have implemented conservation measures for the species, including establishment of marine protected areas and restrictions on spearfishing (Dulvy & Polunin, Reference Dulvy and Polunin2004; Weeks et al., Reference Weeks, Green, Joseph, Peterson and Terk2017).

In India B. muricatum occurs from the Gulf of Mannar in Tamil Nadu state (Varghese et al., Reference Varghese, Manisseri, Ramamurthy, Geetha, Thomas and Gandhi2011), to the Lakshadweep archipelago (Rohan Arthur, pers. comm.) and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Rajan et al., Reference Rajan, Sreeraj and Immanuel2013). Little is known about the species' distribution and conservation status around the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. In the recent past the islands have been affected by a series of coral bleaching events (in 1998, 2002, 2010 and 2016) and the Tsunami of 2004, which may have disturbed the species’ habitat (Jeyabaskaran and Rao Reference Jeyabaskaran and Rao2007; Patankar et al., Reference Patankar, D'Souza, Kumaraguru and Arthur2012; Mondal et al., Reference Mondal, Raghunathan and Venkataraman2013).

For species that are rare, threatened or Data Deficient, local ecological knowledge has been used to examine population trends (Aswani & Hamilton, Reference Aswani and Hamilton2004; Lavides et al., Reference Lavides, Polunin, Stead, Tabaranza, Comeros and Dongallo2009; Lavides et al., Reference Lavides, Molina, de la Rosa, Mill, Rushton, Stead and Polunin2016; Pan et al., Reference Pan, Wei, Cunningham, Li, Chen, Milner-Gulland and Turvey2016). Studies that have combined ecological data from underwater surveys with information from fishers have shown that both sources can provide reliable information (Iniesta-Arandia et al., Reference Iniesta-Arandia, del Amo, Garcia-Neto, Pineiro, Montes and Martin-Lopez2014; Zappes et al., Reference Zappes, Gatts, Lodi, Simões-Lopes, Laporta, Andriolo and Di Beneditto2014). In addition, the inclusion of local ecological knowledge in conservation research can increase the involvement of local stakeholders in conservation activities (Drew, Reference Drew2005). We therefore used a combination of surveys and interviews to assess the abundance, distribution and conservation status of B. muricatum across the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Using generalized linear models, we test whether abundance is influenced by a combination of benthic variables and the presence of marine protected areas, and discuss our findings in the light of developing conservation strategies for B. muricatum around these islands.

Study area

The Andaman and Nicobar archipelago of India is part of the Indo-Myanmar and Sundaland biodiversity hotspots in the south-eastern Bay of Bengal (Davidar et al., Reference Davidar, Devy, Yoganand, Ganesh, Boyle and Boontawee1995; Roberts et al., Reference Roberts, McClean, Veron, Hawkins, Allen and McAllister2002). The archipelago comprises 350 islands and a land area of 8,249 km2, with a total coastline of 1,962 km. It includes the Andaman group (> 325 islands, 24 inhabited, 6,408 km2) and the Nicobar group (21 islands, 13 inhabited, 1,841 km2), separated from each other by the Ten-degree Channel. The Andaman Islands have 105 protected areas (9 national parks and 96 wild sanctuaries), all of which encompass coast and surrounding waters, and the Nicobar Islands have seven community-protected marine areas, with restrictions on fishing and other resource use activities (Patankar et al., Reference Patankar, D'Souza, Alcoverro and Arthur2015). The islands are influenced by both the south-west and north-east monsoons (May–December).

Methods

We surveyed sites across the archipelago, to account for variability in coastal morphology, oceanographic conditions, geography and reef resources. In total we surveyed six sites at Camorta Island, four at Great Nicobar Island and Nancowry Island, two at Aves, Katchal, Little Nicobar, Interview, Twins, Cinque, Sister, Rutland and Eastern Reef islands, and one site at all other locations. The number of sites around each island were selected based on the size of the island, aspect, and location and accessibility of the reef (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Survey sites and the presence of the bumphead parrotfish Bolbometopon muricatum in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The islands/sites that were surveyed for B. muricatum status are: 1, Landfall; 2, East; 3, White cliff; 4, Reef; 5, Excelsior; 6, Delgarno; 7, West; 8, Ross and Smith; 9, Craggy; 10, Kwangtung; 11, Latouche; 12, North Reef; 13, Sound; 14, Aves; 15, Interview; 16, South Reef; 17, Long Island; 18, North Bay; 19, North Button; 20, Guitar; 21, Middle Button; 22, Outram; 23, Henry Lawrence; 24, Strait; 25, John Lawrence; 26, Havelock; 27, Eastern Reef; 28, Neil; 29, Sir Hugh Ross; 30, Ross; 31, Twins; 32, Tarmugli; 33, Grub; 34, Chester; 35, Malay; 36, Rutland; 37, Boat; 38, Jollybuoy; 39, Red Skin; 40, Cinque; 41, North Passage; 42, Sister; 43, Trinket; 44, Camorta; 45, Katchal; 46, Nancowry; 47, Menchal; 48, Great Nicobar; 49, Little Nicobar; 50, Cabra; 51, Kondul. The nine labelled locations are where the interviews were carried out.

Density and abundance

At each site we estimated the abundance of B. muricatum, carrying out an underwater visual census at a total of 75 reef sites across 51 islands, using SCUBA diving, during November 2013–April 2015. At each site we counted B. muricatum along five random 50 × 10 m transects (500 m2) delineated with a 50 m fiberglass tape. Identification of B. muricatum is relatively straightforward because of its large size and the presence of a unique bulbous bump on the head. On sighting, we counted the number of individuals and visually estimated their size. A prior calibration was conducted to refine the accuracy and precision of our underwater size estimates until they were within 10% of actual lengths.

Benthic cover

We quantified the benthic cover (live coral cover, turf algae, macroalgae, sand, rubble, soft coral and others) at each transect by photographing five 1 × 1 m quadrats, one at each 10 m along the 50 m transect, using an underwater camera without flash. Per cent benthic cover categories were measured using Adobe Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, USA).

Documentation of local knowledge

To investigate the awareness and perception of B. muricatum by fishers we conducted a total of 99 semi-structured interviews (Huntington, Reference Huntington2010) during January 2014–May 2015, in three villages in South Andaman (Wandoor, 38 interviews; Junglighat, 15; Mohanpura, 7), two villages in Mayabunder in Middle Andaman (17) and five villages in the Nicobars (Tapong, 4; Hitui, 4; Ramjav, 7; Masala Tapu, 4; Kakana, 3). These are the major fishing villages in the archipelago. All respondents were male, as fishing activities are predominantly carried out by men in this region. The number of interviews in each region was based on the intensity of fishing, the ethnic heterogeneity of the fishing community and the diversity of fishing gear used. Thus, there were 60 interviews in South Andaman, which has the highest number of fishing vessels, several ethnic groups (Telugu, Bengali, Malayali and Tamil) and a high diversity of fishing gear (gillnets, trawls, long lines, hook and lines, cast nets, and hand-held wooden spears and harpoons), and 17 in Middle Andaman and 22 in Central Nicobar, where spearfishing and hook-and-line are the common fishing methods used, by Karen and Nicobari communities. We used the snowball sampling method to select the interviewees in each village (Kvale, Reference Kvale1996). Interviews were conducted in Hindi in South Andaman, and in in Karen and Nicobari in the Middle Andaman and Nicobar Islands, respectively.

To minimize any potential bias, all interviews were carried out by VP, with help of a local interpreter in the Middle Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Most interviews lasted 10–20 minutes and were conducted at fishers’ houses or at fish landing sites. The questions included personal data about the respondents (island and village of residence, age, gender, level of education), preferred fishing gear, target and non-target species captured, and awareness of B. muricatum. In particular, the fishers were asked if they were aware of B. muricatum in their waters, and were shown photographs, to avoid erroneous results arising from the use of different local names for the same fish. We then asked fishers how many times they had seen the fish in the previous year, and how many times they had seen aggregations (i.e. > 25 individuals). When people provided information about their experience of catching B. muricatum, we requested descriptive details of the method of fishing, time of fishing (day/night) and where they fished. Interviews were recorded in writing and later transcribed for quantitative analysis. Before an interview, respondents were provided with information about the nature and expected goals of the study, complete confidentiality was assured, and interviews proceeded only with consent of the interviewee.

Data analysis

We used descriptive statistics to analyse interview data. Bolbometopon muricatum spends most of its time foraging on structural reef carbonate (Bellwood et al., Reference Bellwood, Hoey and Choat2003; Donaldson & Dulvy, Reference Donaldson and Dulvy2004) and, as marine protected areas of sufficient size can protect such fish species (Sadovy Reference Sadovy2005; Green et al., Reference Green, Maypa, Almany, Rhodes, Weeks and Abesamis2015), we expected higher abundances in protected areas with a high per cent of live coral cover. The number of sites without B. muricatum was high (66 of 75) and therefore we used zero-inflated Poisson generalized linear models (GLM) to model abundance. An exploratory analysis revealed that these models performed better than a GLM with Poisson error (Vuong test statistic = 2.04, P < 0.05). The zero-inflated Poisson GLM is a two-step process in which abundances are modelled as count variables with a Poisson distribution conditional on the probability that the values are non-zero (a binomial variable). As B. muricatum was encountered at only a few sites we did not include multiple variables in a single model, to avoid overfitting. We compared the effects of live coral, soft coral and others, turf algae, and with and without a marine protected area. If the zero abundances in the data can be attributed entirely to the species’ biology, then the zero model should only contain a single intercept term. We used package pscl 1.4.9 in R 3.4 for regression analysis (R Development Core Team, 2016).

Results

Abundance and distribution

Around the 51 islands surveyed, we sighted a total of 59 individual B. muricatum at nine islands (seven in the Andamans and two in the Nicobars), with Sister Island in South Andaman having the highest abundance (29 individuals) and the largest shoal size (18 individuals), followed by Craggy Island in North Andaman (one shoal of 12 individuals), six individuals at Nancowry, four individuals each at Rutland and John Lawrence islands, and a single individual at Great Nicobar, Landfall, Cinque and Neil Islands. All the fish were > 50 cm except one subadult (< 50 cm) at Neil Island. We did not observe any juveniles. This could be because the habitat we sampled is not preferred by juvenile reef fish (Hamilton et al., Reference Hamilton, Almany, Brown, Pita, Peterson and Howard Choat2017). The average density of B. muricatum was 0.0262 individuals per ha at the nine sites where we sighted the fish, and the density across the entire archipelago was 0.0032 individuals per ha.

Influence of benthic cover and protected areas

Rutland Island in South Andaman had the highest live coral cover (mean  52.5 ± SE 0.1%, 2 sites); the lowest was recorded at Excelsior (n = 1), Kwantung (n = 1) and Landfall (n = 1) Islands (mean 21 ± SE 0.1%). Thirty-one islands surveyed had an intermediate cover of live coral (29–41%). Algal cover was low at most sampled sites, with the highest at Smith Island (19%, n = 1) in North Andaman and lowest (1%) at Katchal, West, Redskin, Kondul and Menchal Islands. Zero-inflated Poisson regression models for the effects of benthic variables and presence/absence of a marine protected area on the abundance of B. muricatum showed that live coral cover was an important predictor and any additional effects of benthic variables on the zero inflation part of the model could not be identified. The effects of live coral and presence of a protected area were positive in all count models. The best model contained effects of live coral, rubble and sand and management variables (Table 3).

Fishers characteristics

Of the 99 male respondents 53% were ≤ 40 years of age and 47% > 40, and level of education was low (most respondents had not completed secondary education). All interviewees were full-time fishers, except in South Andaman where 33% were part-time fishers, with farming as their alternative livelihood. All fishers used more than one type of fishing gear, to diversify catch composition. Hook-and-line, hand-held wooden spears and harpoons and gillnets were the most common fishing methods. Amongst these, hook-and-line was the most commonly used fishing gear across regions, followed by gills nets, spears and harpoons. The characteristics of respondents are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Detailed individual, social and fishing characteristics of fishers interviewed in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Fig. 1).

Awareness/knowledge of B. muricatum

Most fishers were aware of the presence of B. muricatum in their waters (see Table 2 for a summary of respones to all questions). Amongst these, all fishermen in Central Nicobar and Middle Andaman had seen aggregations of the fish. Bolbometopon muricatum was most commonly referred to as tota macchi, which translates to parrotfish in Hindi, the most widely spoken language in the archipelago. All respondents in Middle Andaman and Nicobar had seen B. muricatum feeding, whereas in South Andaman only 22% had seen feeding. All the interviewed fishers who were aware of the presence of the fish in their waters were also aware that B. muricatum is not legally protected in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Anon., 1992). Most fishers in the Nicobars (91%), all fishers in Middle Andaman, and 8% of fishers in South Andaman had hunted the fish in their lifetime, using hand-held wooden spears or harpoons, mostly in daylight. All fishers who had caught the fish in their lifetime reported that the catch was opportunistic rather than targeted.

Table 2 Awareness/knowledge of fishers regarding Bolbometopon muricatum in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (responses, except for range of sightings, are per cent of respondents on each island).

Table 3 The three best zero-inflated Poisson regression models testing the effects of management status (presence of marine protected areas, MPA) and benthic variables on the abundance of B. muricatum in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

*Count model describes covariates for abundance data, and zero model describes covariates for sites with zero abundance.

Discussion

We carried out the first investigation of the distribution and abundance of the Vulnerable B. muricatum in the Andaman and Nicobar archipelago, using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The species occurs broadly, from the northernmost island in Andaman (Landfall Island) to the southernmost island in the Nicobars (Great Nicobar Island) and, except for fishers from South Andaman, most respondents were aware of the presence of this fish, its aggregation behavior and had seen it feeding. Although we sighted 59 individuals from nine islands, the fish occurs patchily, with most sightings from only two islands, and with an apparently naturally low density. The mean density we recorded (0.0032 per ha) is comparable to that observed on reefs of Malaysia (0.0042 per ha), Myanmar (0.0016 per ha) and Thailand (0.0004 per ha; Kobayashi et al., Reference Kobayashi, Friedlander, Grimes, Nichols and Zgliczynski2011). These densities are, however, markedly lower than those in other areas (Great Barrier Reef: 30 per ha; Solomon Islands: 0.3–4.2 per ha; Hamilton & Choat, Reference Hamilton, Choat, Sadovy de Mitchson and Colin2012).

In areas where B. muricatum is a fishery resource, free diving spearfishers exclusively target nocturnal aggregations (Comeros-Raynal et al., Reference Comeros-Raynal, Choat, Polidoro, Clements, Abesamis and Craig2012). However, in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands all fishers reported that catch was opportunistic rather than targeted. The main fishing gear used in the islands is hook-and-line and, other than spear or harpoon fishers, most do not encounter B. muricatum on their regular fishing trips.

We found that the presence of a protected area, live coral and algal cover significantly influenced the distribution and abundance of B. muricatum. Although changes in the composition of these benthic characteristics as a result of disturbances could have negatively affected the abundance and distribution of this species in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Krishnan et al., Reference Krishnan, Dam Roy, George, Srivastava, Anand and Murugesan2011; Patankar et al., Reference Patankar, D'Souza, Kumaraguru and Arthur2012), no baseline data are available. Marine protected areas in which fishing and other activities are restricted aid the conservation of fish stocks (Donaldson & Dulvy, Reference Donaldson and Dulvy2004) and in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands the existing protected areas may be vital for the protection of B. muricatum and other fishes. Evidence of low abundance of B. muricatum on ocean reefs surrounded by deep waters, and traits such as limited dispersal and gregariousness, could also have influenced the distribution and abundance of this fish (Hamilton & Choat, Reference Hamilton, Choat, Sadovy de Mitchson and Colin2012; Munoz et al., Reference Munoz, Zgliczynski, Teer and Laughlin2014).

The current potential threats to B. muricatum in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands include incidental catch by fishers and degradation of coral reef habitats. Protected area designations and threatened species legislation are effective only if social conditions also encourage self-regulation (Sawchuk et al., Reference Sawchuk, Beaudreau, Tonnes and Fluharty2015). Although the present protected areas are supporting higher abundances of B. muricatum, fishing and benthic degradation could potentially result in future declines. We recommend extensive long-term population studies of B. muricatum in the archipelago, a regional Red List assessment for the species and inclusion in the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972. As reef fishery is growing, it will be necessary to implement regulations to avoid population declines, e.g. a ban on night fishing for B. muricatum. The latter would not compromise the livelihood of the fishing community as catch of B. muricatum is opportunistic. Considering the Vulnerable status of B. muricatum globally, the species could be a flagship for educational campaigns focusing on the importance of conserving similar functionally important fish groups and protecting the coral reefs of the islands.

Acknowledgements

The study was conducted with funding from the Research Fellowship Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, and Ravi Sankaran Inlaks Fellowship Program. We thank the Department of Environment and Forests, Port Blair, for granting us permits to carry out this work and for a boat for reef surveys; M. Gangal, R. Arthur, T. Alcoverro, N. Kelkar and E. D'Souza for support and advice; the Andaman and Nicobar Island's Environmental Team and Nature Conservation Foundation for help with SCUBA equipment and field logistics; and Saw John, Elrika D'Souza, Saw Berny, Saw Alexander, Saw Sawda, Tanvi Vaidyanathan and Sahir Advani for field assistance.

Author contributions

Study design, data collection and writing: VP; assistance with writing and preparation of map: TW; data analysis: AM.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

Nicobarese are a Scheduled Tribe of India, and entry into the islands is regulated by the Andaman & Nicobar Islands Protection of Aboriginal Tribes Regulation 1956. We obtained the requisite Tribal Area Entry Permits, to land and conduct research, from the Department of Tribal Welfare and District Commissioner's office at Port Blair. During each visit we also obtained permission to conduct research from the Chief Captain of the village and Chairperson of the Tribal Council of the area. We obtained all requisite clearances from the Nature Conservation Foundation's Institutional ethical committee and from the doctoral research committee of Marurai Kamaraj University prior to conducting fieldwork.

Footnotes

*

Also at: National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, India

Supplementary material for this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318000376

References

Andrews, A.H., Choat, J.H., Hamilton, R.J. & DeMartini, E.E. (2015) Refined bomb radiocarbon dating of two iconic fishes of the Great Barrier Reef. Marine and Freshwater Research, 66, 305316.10.1071/MF14086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon. (1992) The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Natraj Publishers, Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
Aswani, S. & Hamilton, R.J. (2004) Integrating indigenous ecological knowledge and customary sea tenure with marine and social science for conservation of bumphead parrotfish (Bolbometopon muricatum) in the Roviana Lagoon, Solomon Islands. Environmental Conservation, 31, 6983.10.1017/S037689290400116XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, D.R., Hoey, A.S. & Choat, J.H. (2003) Limited functional redundancy in high diversity systems: resilience and ecosystem function on coral reefs. Ecology Letters, 6, 281285.10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00432.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, D.R., Hoey, A.S. & Hughes, T.P. (2011) Human activity selectively impacts the ecosystem roles of parrotfishes on coral reefs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279, 16211629.10.1098/rspb.2011.1906CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellwood, D.R., Hughes, T.P. & Hoey, A.S. (2006) Sleeping functional group drives coral-reef recovery. Current Biology, 16, 24342439.10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boaden, A.E. & Kingsford, M.J. (2015) Predators drive community structure in coral reef fish assemblages. Ecosphere, 6, 133.10.1890/ES14-00292.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkepile, D.E. & Hay, M.E. (2010) Impact of herbivore identity on algal succession and coral growth on a Caribbean reef. PLOS ONE, 5, e8963.10.1371/journal.pone.0008963CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, T., Sadovy, Y. & Donaldson, T. (2012) Bulbometopon muricatum. In IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2012: e. T63571A17894276. Http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012.RLTS.T63571A17894276.en [accessed 27 June 2018].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, A.J., Lawton, R.J., Pratchett, M.S. & Wilson, S.K. (2011) Chronic coral consumption by butterflyfishes. Coral Reefs, 30, 8593.10.1007/s00338-010-0674-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comeros-Raynal, M.T., Choat, J.H., Polidoro, B.A., Clements, K.D., Abesamis, R., Craig, M.T. et al. (2012) The likelihood of extinction of iconic and dominant herbivores and detritivores of coral reefs: the parrotfishes and surgeonfishes. PLOS ONE 7, e39825.10.1371/journal.pone.0039825CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidar, P., Devy, S., Yoganand, T.R.K. & Ganesh, T.P. (1995) Reserve size and implications for the conservation of biodiversity in the Andaman Islands. In Measuring & monitoring biodiversity in tropical and temperate forests. (eds Boyle, T.J.B. & Boontawee, B.), pp. 287301. Centre for International Forest Research, Jakatra, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Diaz-Pulido, G. & McCook, L.J. (2003) Relative roles of herbivory and nutrients in the recruitment of coral reef seaweeds. Ecology, 84, 20262033.10.1890/01-3127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T.J. & Dulvy, N.K. (2004) Threatened fishes of the world: Bolbometopon muricatum (Valenciennes 1840) (Scaridae). Environmental Biology of Fishes, 70, 373.10.1023/B:EBFI.0000035509.89614.1eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, J.A. (2005) Use of traditional ecological knowledge in marine conservation. Conservation Biology, 19, 12861293.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00158.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulvy, N.K. & Polunin, N.V.C. (2004) Using informal knowledge to infer human-induced rarity of a conspicuous reef fish. Animal Conservation, 7, 365374.10.1017/S1367943004001519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, A.L., Maypa, A.P., Almany, G.R., Rhodes, K.L., Weeks, R., Abesamis, R.A. et al. (2015) Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design. Biological Reviews, 90, 12151247.10.1111/brv.12155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, R.J., Almany, G.R., Brown, C.J., Pita, J., Peterson, N.A. & Howard Choat, J. (2017) Logging degrades nursery habitat for an iconic coral reef fish. Biological Conservation, 210, 273280.10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, R.J., Almany, G.R., Stevens, D., Bode, M., Pita, J., Peterson, N.A. & Choat, J.H. (2016) Hyperstability masks declines in bumphead parrofish Bolbometopon muricatum populations. Coral Reefs, 35, 751763.10.1007/s00338-016-1441-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, R.J. & Choat, J. H. (2012) Bumphead parrotfish Bolbometopon muricatum. In Reef Fish Spawning Aggregations: Biology, Research and Management, Fish & Fisheries Series, Vol. 35 (eds Sadovy de Mitchson, Y. & Colin, P. L.), pp. 490496. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Hughes, T.P., Rodrigues, M.J., Bellwood, D.R., Ceccarelli, D., Hoegh-guldberg, O., McCook, L. et al. (2007) Phase shifts, herbivory, and the resilience of coral reefs to climate change. Current Biology, 17, 360365.10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntington, H.P. (2010) Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecological Applications, 10, 12701274.10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1270:UTEKIS]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN (2015) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2015-4. Http://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 19 November 2015].Google Scholar
Iniesta-Arandia, I., del Amo, D.C., Garcia-Neto, A.P., Pineiro, C., Montes, C. & Martin-Lopez, B. (2014) Factors influencing local ecological knowledge maintenance in Mediterranean watersheds: insights for environmental policies. Ambio, 44, 284296.Google ScholarPubMed
Jennings, S. & Polunin, N.V.C. (1997) Impacts of predator depletion by fishing on the biomass and diversity of non-target reef fish communities. Coral Reefs, 16, 7182.10.1007/s003380050061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeyabaskaran, R. & Rao, D. (2007) Impact of the December 24, 2004 tsunami on coral reefs of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Reef Encounter, 34, 2530.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, D., Friedlander, A., Grimes, C., Nichols, R. & Zgliczynski, B. (2011) Bumphead Parrotfish (Bolbometopon muricatum) Status Review. NOAA Technical Memorandum, NOAA-TM-NMFS-PIFSC-26. U.S. Department of Commerce, Honolulu, USA.Google Scholar
Krishnan, P., Dam Roy, S., George, G., Srivastava, R.C., Anand, A., Murugesan, S. et al. (2011) Elevated sea surface temperature during May 2010 induces mass bleaching of corals in the Andaman. Current Science, 100, 1117.Google Scholar
Kvale, S. (1996) Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage, London, UK.Google Scholar
Lavides, M.N., Molina, E.P.V., de la Rosa, G.E., Mill, A.C., Rushton, S.P., Stead, S.M. & Polunin, N.V.C. (2016) Patterns of coral-reef finfish species disappearances inferred from fishers’ knowledge in global epicentre of marine shorefish diversity. PLOS ONE, 11, e0155752.10.1371/journal.pone.0155752CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavides, M.N., Polunin, N.V.C., Stead, S.M., Tabaranza, D.G., Comeros, M.T. & Dongallo, J.R. (2009) Finfish disappearances around Bohol, Philippines inferred from traditional ecological knowledge. Environmental Conservation, 36, 235244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccauley, D.J., Young, H.S., Guevara, R., Williams, G.J., Power, E.A., Dunbar, R.B. et al. (2014) Positive and negative effects of a threatened parrotfish on reef ecosystems. Conservation Biology, 28, 13121321.10.1111/cobi.12314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mondal, T., Raghunathan, C. & Venkataraman, K. (2013) Coral bleaching in Andaman Sea—an indicator for climate change in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences, 43, 19451948.Google Scholar
Munoz, R.C., Zgliczynski, B.J., Teer, B.Z. & Laughlin, J.L. (2014) Spawning aggregation behaviour and reproductive ecology of the giant bumphead parrotfish Bolbometopon muricatum in a remote marine reserve. PeerJ, 2, e681.10.7717/peerj.681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyström, M. (2006) Redundancy and response diversity of functional groups: implications for the resilience of coral reefs. Ambio, 35, 3035.10.1579/0044-7447-35.1.30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pan, Y., Wei, G., Cunningham, A.A., Li, S., Chen, S., Milner-Gulland, E.J. & Turvey, S.T. (2016). Using local ecological knowledge to assess the status of the critically endangered chinese giant salamander Andrias davidianus in Guizhou Province, China. Oryx, 50, 257264.10.1017/S0030605314000830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patankar, V., D'Souza, E., Alcoverro, T. & Arthur, R. (2015) Erosion of traditional marine management systems in the face of disturbances in the Nicobar Archipelago. Human Ecology, 43, 697707.10.1007/s10745-015-9781-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patankar, V., D'Souza, E., Kumaraguru, A.K. & Arthur, R. (2012) Distance-related thresholds and influence of the 2004 tsunami on damage and recovery patters of coral reefs in the Nicobar Islands. Current Science, 102, 1199–1025.Google Scholar
Rajan, P.T., Sreeraj, C.R. & Immanuel, T. (2013) Fishes of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands: a checklist. Journal of the Andaman Science Association, 18, 4787.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Roberts, C.M., McClean, C.J., Veron, J.E., Hawkins, J.P., Allen, G.R., McAllister, D.E. et al. (2002) Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs. Science, 295, 12801284.10.1126/science.1067728CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roff, G., Doropoulos, C., Mereb, G. & Mumby, P.J. (2017) Mass spawning aggregation of the giant bumphead parrotfish Bolbometopon muricatum. Journal of Fish Biology, 91, 354361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadovy, Y (2005) Trouble on the reef: the imperative for managing vulnerable and valuable fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 6, 167–85.10.1111/j.1467-2979.2005.00186.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawchuk, J.H., Beaudreau, A.H., Tonnes, D. & Fluharty, D. (2015) Using stakeholder engagement to inform endangered species management and improve conservation. Marine Pollution, 54, 98107.10.1016/j.marpol.2014.12.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varghese, M., Manisseri, M.K., Ramamurthy, M., Geetha, P.M., Thomas, V.J. & Gandhi, A. (2011) Coral reef fishes of Gulf of Mannar, S.E of India. Fishing Chimes, 31, 3840.Google Scholar
Weeks, R., Green, A. L., Joseph, E., Peterson, N. & Terk, E. (2017) Using reef fish movement to inform marine reserve design. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54, 145152.10.1111/1365-2664.12736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zappes, C.A., Gatts, C.E.N., Lodi, L.F., Simões-Lopes, P.C., Laporta, P., Andriolo, A. & Di Beneditto, A.P.M. (2014) Comparison of local knowledge about the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus Montagu, 1821) in the south-west Atlantic Ocean: new research needed to develop conservation management strategies. Oceans and Coastal Management, 98, 120129.10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.06.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Survey sites and the presence of the bumphead parrotfish Bolbometopon muricatum in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The islands/sites that were surveyed for B. muricatum status are: 1, Landfall; 2, East; 3, White cliff; 4, Reef; 5, Excelsior; 6, Delgarno; 7, West; 8, Ross and Smith; 9, Craggy; 10, Kwangtung; 11, Latouche; 12, North Reef; 13, Sound; 14, Aves; 15, Interview; 16, South Reef; 17, Long Island; 18, North Bay; 19, North Button; 20, Guitar; 21, Middle Button; 22, Outram; 23, Henry Lawrence; 24, Strait; 25, John Lawrence; 26, Havelock; 27, Eastern Reef; 28, Neil; 29, Sir Hugh Ross; 30, Ross; 31, Twins; 32, Tarmugli; 33, Grub; 34, Chester; 35, Malay; 36, Rutland; 37, Boat; 38, Jollybuoy; 39, Red Skin; 40, Cinque; 41, North Passage; 42, Sister; 43, Trinket; 44, Camorta; 45, Katchal; 46, Nancowry; 47, Menchal; 48, Great Nicobar; 49, Little Nicobar; 50, Cabra; 51, Kondul. The nine labelled locations are where the interviews were carried out.

Figure 1

Table 1 Detailed individual, social and fishing characteristics of fishers interviewed in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Fig. 1).

Figure 2

Table 2 Awareness/knowledge of fishers regarding Bolbometopon muricatum in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (responses, except for range of sightings, are per cent of respondents on each island).

Figure 3

Table 3 The three best zero-inflated Poisson regression models testing the effects of management status (presence of marine protected areas, MPA) and benthic variables on the abundance of B. muricatum in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

Supplementary material: File

Patankar et al. supplementary material

Patankar et al. supplementary material
Download Patankar et al. supplementary material(File)
File 66 KB
You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Protected areas and benthic characteristics influence the distribution of the Vulnerable bumphead parrotfish Bolbometopon muricatum in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Protected areas and benthic characteristics influence the distribution of the Vulnerable bumphead parrotfish Bolbometopon muricatum in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Protected areas and benthic characteristics influence the distribution of the Vulnerable bumphead parrotfish Bolbometopon muricatum in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *