Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Utility of a psychological framework for carnivore conservation

  • Neil H. Carter (a1), Shawn J. Riley (a2) and Jianguo Liu (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Conserving threatened carnivore species increasingly depends on the capacity of local people to cohabit with those species. To examine such capacity we developed a novel psychological framework for conservation in regions of the world where there are human–carnivore conflicts, and used the Endangered tiger Panthera tigris to explore the utility of this framework. Specifically, we tested three hypotheses in Chitwan National Park, Nepal, where increasing human–tiger conflicts potentially jeopardize long-term coexistence. We administered a survey to 499 individuals living < 2 km from the Park and in nearby multiple-use forest, to record preferred future tiger population size and factors that may influence preferences, including past interactions with tigers (e.g. livestock predation) and beliefs and perceptions about tigers. Over 17% of respondents reported that a tiger had attacked their livestock or threatened them directly. Results from a structural equation model indicated that respondents who preferred fewer tigers in the future were less likely to associate tigers with beneficial attributes, more likely to associate tigers with undesirable attributes, and more likely to believe that government officials poorly manage tiger-related risks and that people are vulnerable to risks from tigers. Our framework can help address current and future conservation challenges because it (1) integrates an expansive and generalized set of psychological concepts, (2) enables the identification of conservation interventions that foster coexistence between people and carnivores, and (3) is suitable for broad application.

Copyright
Corresponding author
(Corresponding author) E-mail cartern7@msu.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

I.Ajzen (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179211.

I. Ajzen (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665683.

P.Bohra & D.S.Massey (2009) Processes of internal and international migration from Chitwan, Nepal. International Migration Review, 43, 621651.

J.T. Bruskotter , J.J. Vaske & R.H. Schmidt (2009) Social and cognitive correlates of Utah residents’ acceptance of the lethal control of wolves. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14, 119132.

L.H.Carpenter , D.J.Decker & J.F.Lipscomb (2000) Stakeholder acceptance capacity in wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 5, 519.

B.Curry , W.Moore , J.Bauer , K.Cosgriff & N.Lipscombe (2001) Modelling impacts of wildlife tourism on animal communities: a case study from Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 9, 514529.

A.J. Dickman , E.A. Macdonald & D.W. Macdonald (2011) A review of financial instruments to pay for predator conservation and encourage human–carnivore coexistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 108, 1393713944.

D.C.Fulton , M.J.Manfredo & J.Lipscomb (1996) Wildlife value orientations: a conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1, 2447.

M.L. Gore & B.A. Knuth (2009) Mass media effect on the operating environment of a wildlife-related risk-communication campaign. Journal of Wildlife Management, 73, 14071413.

M.L. Gore , B.A. Knuth , P.D. Curtis & J.E. Shanahan (2006) Stakeholder perceptions of risk associated with human–black bear conflicts in New York's Adirondack Park campgrounds: implications for theory and practice. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34, 3643.

B. Gurung , J.L.D. Smith , C. McDougal , J.B. Karki & A. Barlow (2008) Factors associated with human-killing tigers in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Biological Conservation, 141, 30693078.

L.Hu & P.M.Bentler (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 155.


P. Kaczensky , M. Blazic & H. Gossow (2004) Public attitudes towards brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Slovenia. Biological Conservation, 118, 661674.

R.E. Kasperson , O. Renn , P. Slavic , H.S. Brown , J. Emel , R. Goble (1988) The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8, 177187.

S.R.Kellert (1985) Social and perceptual factors in endangered species management. Journal of Wildlife Management, 49, 528536.

B.M. Kissui (2008) Livestock predation by lions, leopards, spotted hyenas, and their vulnerability to retaliatory killing in the Maasai steppe, Tanzania. Animal Conservation, 11, 422432.

A. Laurie (1982) Behavioural ecology of the greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis). Journal of Zoology, 196, 307341.

S.A. Lischka , S.J. Riley & B.A. Rudolph (2008) Effects of impact perception on acceptance capacity for white-tailed deer. Journal of Wildlife Management, 72, 502509.

L. Marker , M. Mills & D. Macdonald (2003) Factors influencing perceptions of conflict and tolerance toward cheetahs on Namibian farmlands. Conservation Biology, 17, 12901298.

M.O.Ogada , R.Woodroffe , N.O.Oguge & L.G.Frank (2003) Limiting depredation by African carnivores: the role of livestock husbandry. Conservation Biology, 17, 15211530.

K.J. Preacher & A.F. Hayes (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879891.

Y. Reisinger & F. Mavondo (2007) Structural equation modeling. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 21, 4171.

S.J. Riley & D.J. Decker (2000a) Risk perception as a factor in wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 5, 5062.


V.K.Saberwal , J.P.Gibbs , R.Chellam & A.J.T.Johnsingh (1994) Lion–human conflict in the Gir forest, India. Conservation Biology, 8, 501507.

J.L. Schafer (1999) Multiple imputation: a primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 315.

U.R.Sharma (1990) An overview of park–people interactions in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Landscape and Urban Planning, 19, 133144.

L. Sjöberg (1998) Worry and risk perception. Risk Analysis, 18, 8594.

P. Slovic (1987) Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280285.

P. Slovic (1993) Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13, 675682.

S. Straede & T. Treue (2006) Beyond buffer zone protection: a comparative study of park and buffer zone products’ importance to villagers living inside Royal Chitwan National Park and to villagers living in its buffer zone. Journal of Environmental Management, 78, 251267.

A. Treves & K.U. Karanth (2003) Human–carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conservation Biology, 17, 14911499.

A.Treves , R.B.Wallace , L.Naughton-Treves & A.Morales (2006) Co-managing human–wildlife conflicts: a review. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 11, 383396.

J. Walston , J.G. Robinson , E.L. Bennett , U. Breitenmoser , G.A.B. da Fonseca , J. Goodrich (2010) Bringing the tiger back from the brink—the six percent solution. PLoS Biology, 8, 493506.

S.W.Wang & D.W.Macdonald (2006) Livestock predation by carnivores in Jigme Singye Wangchuck National Park, Bhutan. Biological Conservation, 129, 558565.

D.Whittaker , J.J.Vaske & M.J.Manfredo (2006) Specificity and the cognitive hierarchy: value orientations and the acceptability of urban wildlife management actions. Society and Natural Resources, 19, 515530.

R. Woodroffe (2000) Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores. Animal Conservation, 3, 165173.

R. Woodroffe & J.R. Ginsberg (1998) Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science, 280, 21262128.


H. Zinn , M. Manfredo & D. Decker (2008) Human conditioning to wildlife: steps toward theory and research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 13, 388399.

H.C. Zinn , M.J. Manfredo & J.J. Vaske (2000) Social psychological bases for stakeholder acceptance capacity. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 5, 2033.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Oryx
  • ISSN: 0030-6053
  • EISSN: 1365-3008
  • URL: /core/journals/oryx
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: