Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Winch, Christopher 2010. Learning the virtues at work. Ethics and Education, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, p. 173.

    SCOTT, KYLE 2009. Mandeville's Paradox as Satire: The Moral Consequences of Being a Good Citizen in a Commercial Society. Politics & Policy, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 369.

    Buckley, Joan and Tuama, Seamus O 2005. International pricing and distribution of therapeutic pharmaceuticals: an ethical minefield. Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 127.


The Mandevillean Conceit and the Profit-motive


Invisible Hand accounts of the operations of the competitive market are often thought to have two implications for morality as it confronts economic life. First, explanantions of agents economic activities eschew constitutive appeal to moral notions; and second, such moralism is pernicious insofar as it tends to undermine the operations of a socially valuable social process. This is the Mandevillean Conceit. The Conceit rests on an avarice-only reading of the profit-motive that is mistaken. The avarice-only reading is not the only way of characterising the profit-motive, and there are some positive grounds for thinking the benefits of profit pursuit are better attributed to the “lucrephile”, and not the avarice-only “lucrepath”.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0031-8191
  • EISSN: 1469-817X
  • URL: /core/journals/philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *