Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Phonetic evidence for an iterative stress system: the issue of consonantal rhythm

  • Beata Łukaszewicz (a1)
Abstract

In her study published in this journal, Newlin-Łukowicz (2012) calls into question the existence of bidirectional stress systems. The argument hinges on the failure to detect acoustic correlates of word-internal subsidiary stress in Polish, the language hitherto considered to be a classic example of metrical bidirectionality. This paper reappraises the issue, reporting on an acoustic study of paired five- and six-syllable words in Polish (e.g. ˎpomido′rowyˎpomiˎdoro-′wego). The results indicate that the words differ significantly with respect to relative consonant duration (PVI values) in the onset of the third syllable, depending on whether the syllable bears subsidiary stress (as in six-syllable words) or remains unstressed (as in five-syllable words). Similar effects are reported in the initial syllable, but not in the second syllable, which remains consistently unstressed. The conclusion is that Polish has iterative stress, corroborating its traditional description as having a bidirectional stress system.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Phonetic evidence for an iterative stress system: the issue of consonantal rhythm
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Phonetic evidence for an iterative stress system: the issue of consonantal rhythm
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Phonetic evidence for an iterative stress system: the issue of consonantal rhythm
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: b.lukaszewicz@uw.edu.pl.
Footnotes
Hide All

I wish to thank the three anonymous reviewers and editors of Phonology for discussion and criticism, which were very helpful in improving the paper. I am also grateful to Janina Mołczanow for her comments on the first version of the paper. Thanks are also due to the audiences at the 23rd Manchester Phonology Meeting and Phonetics and Phonology in Europe 2015 at the University of Cambridge, where preliminary results were presented. I would also like to thank the Polish speakers who took part in the experiment. This research was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland (grant 2015/17/B/HS2/01455). All errors are mine.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Alber, Birgit (2005). Clash, lapse and directionality. NLLT 23. 485542.
Arciuli, Joanne, Simpson, Briony S., Vogel, Adam P. & Ballard, Kirrie J. (2014). Acoustic changes in the production of lexical stress during Lombard speech. Language and Speech 57. 149162.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59. 390412.
Ballard, Kirrie J., Djaja, Danica, Arciuli, Joanne, James, Deborah G. H. & van Doorn, Jan (2012). Developmental trajectory for production of prosody: lexical stress contrastivity in children ages 3 to 7 years and in adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55. 18221835.
Ballard, Kirrie J., Robin, Donald A., McCabe, Patricia & McDonald, Jeannie (2010). A treatment for dysprosody in childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53. 12271245.
Beckman, Mary E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht: Foris.
Benni, Tytus (1923). Fonetyka opisowa. In Benni, T., Nitsch, J. Ko÷, K., Rozwadowski, J. & Ułaszyn, H. (eds.) Gramatyka języka polskiego. Krakow: Polska Akademia Umiejętno÷ci. 155.
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2015). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 6.0.08). http://www.praat.org/.
Dłuska, Maria (1932). Rytm spóLgLoskowy polskich grup akcentowych. Krakow: Polska Akademia Umiejętno÷ci.
Dłuska, Maria (1974). Prozodia języka polskiego. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Dogil, Grzegorz (1999). The phonetic manifestation of word stress in Lithuanian, Polish, German and Spanish. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.) Word prosodic systems of the languages of Europe. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 273311.
Doroszewski, Witold (1952). Podstawy gramatyki polskiej. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Elenbaas, Nine & Kager, René (1999). Ternary rhythm and the lapse constraint. Phonology 16. 273329.
Fletcher, Janet (2010). The prosody of speech: timing and rhythm. In Hardcastle, William J., Laver, John & Gibbon, Fiona E. (eds.) The handbook of phonetic sciences. 2nd edn. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 523602.
Furby, Christine (1974). Garawa phonology. Canberra: Australian National University.
Gordon, Matthew (2002). A factorial typology of quantity-insensitive stress. NLLT 20. 491552.
Gordon, Matthew & Rose, Françoise (2006). Émérillon stress: a phonetic and phonological study. Anthropological Linguistics 48. 132168.
Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Hawkins, Sarah (2010). Phonological features, auditory objects, and illusions. JPh 38. 6089.
Hintz, Diane M. (2006). Stress in South Conchucos Quechua: a phonetic and phonological study. International Journal of American Linguistics 72. 477521.
Hulst, Harry van der (2014). Representing rhythm. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.) Word stress: theoretical and typological issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 325365.
Hyde, Brett (2008). Bidirectional stress systems. WCCFL 26. 270278.
Jassem, Wiktor (1962). Akcent języka polskiego. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Kager, René (1994). Ternary rhythm in alignment theory. Ms, Utrecht University. Available as ROA-35 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Kager, René (2001). Rhythmic directionality by positional licensing. Handout of paper presented at the 5th Holland Institute of Linguistics Phonology Conference, Potsdam. Available as ROA-514 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Kager, René (2005). Rhythmic licensing theory: an extended typology. Proceedings of the 3rd Seoul International Conference on Linguistics (SICOL) . Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea. 531.
Klatt, Dennis H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. JASA 59. 12081221.
Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona (2003). The phonology of stress in Polish. Munich: Lincom.
Lehiste, Ilse (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Lehiste, Ilse (1972). The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. JASA 51. 20182024.
Levi, Susannah V. (2005). Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35. 7397.
Liberman, Mark & Prince, Alan (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. LI 8. 249336.
Lindblom, B. & Rapp, K. (1972). Reexamination of the compensatory adjustment of vowel duration in Swedish words. Occasional Papers, University of Essex 13. 204224.
Low, Ee Ling, Grabe, Esther & Nolan, Francis (2000). Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech 43. 377401.
Łukaszewicz, Beata & Mołczanow, Janina (2018). Rhythmic stress in Ukrainian: acoustic evidence of a bidirectional system. JL 54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226717000305.
Łukaszewicz, Beata & Mołczanow, Janina (to appear). Leftward and rightward stress iteration in Ukrainian: acoustic evidence and theoretical implications. In Czaplicki, Bartło-miej, Łukaszewicz, Beata & Opalińska, Monika (eds.) Phonology, fieldwork and generalisations. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Łukaszewicz, Beata & Rozborski, Bogdan (2008). Korelaty akustyczne akcentu wyrazowego w języku polskim dorosłych i dzieci. Prace Filologiczne 54. 265283.
Lynch, John (1978). A grammar of Lenakel. Canberra: Australian National University.
McCarthy, John J. (2003). OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20. 75138.
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan (1993). Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993. 79153.
Malisz, Zofia & Wagner, Petra (2011–12). Acoustic-phonetic realisation of Polish syllable prominence: a corpus study. Speech and Language Technology 14/15. 105114.
Matteson, Esther (1965). The Piro (Arawakan) language. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Newlin-Łukowicz, Luiza (2012). Polish stress: looking for phonetic evidence of a bidirectional system. Phonology 29. 271329.
Peperkamp, Sharon & Dupoux, Emmanuel (2002). A typological study of stress ‘deafness’. In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Warner, Natasha (eds.) Laboratory phonology 7. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 203240.
Peperkamp, Sharon, Le Calvez, Rozenn, Nadal, Jean-Pierre & Dupoux, Emmanuel (2006). The acquisition of allophonic rules: statistical learning with linguistic constraints. Cognition 101. B31B41.
Peperkamp, Sharon, Vendelin, Inga & Dupoux, Emmanuel (2010). Perception of predictable stress: a cross-linguistic investigation. JPh 38. 422430.
Peterson, Gordon E. & Lehiste, Ilse (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. JASA 32. 693703.
Pinheiro, José C. & Bates, Douglas M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.
Plag, Ingo, Kunter, Gero & Schramm, Mareile (2011). Acoustic correlates of primary and secondary stress in North American English. JPh 39. 362374.
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.
Ramus, Franck, Nespor, Marina & Mehler, Jacques (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 73. 265292.
Rietveld, Toni, Kerkhoff, Joop & Gussenhoven, Carlos (2004). Word prosodic structure and vowel duration in Dutch. JPh 32. 349371.
Rubach, Jerzy & Booij, Geert (1985). A grid theory of stress in Polish. Lingua 66. 281319.
Szober, Stanisław (1923). Gramatyka języka polskiego. Lwów & Warsaw: Ksiˉznica Polska.
Tabain, Marija, Fletcher, Janet & Butcher, Andrew (2014). Lexical stress in Pitjantjatjara. JPh 42. 5266.
Turk, Alice E. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie (2000). Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English. JPh 28. 397440.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Phonology
  • ISSN: 0952-6757
  • EISSN: 1469-8188
  • URL: /core/journals/phonology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Łukaszewicz supplementary material
Łukaszewicz supplementary material 1

 PDF (2.0 MB)
2.0 MB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 22
Total number of PDF views: 128 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 581 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 1st March 2018 - 25th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.