Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 153
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    CRYSMANN, BERTHOLD and BONAMI, OLIVIER 2016. Variable morphotactics in Information-based Morphology. Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 52, Issue. 02, p. 311.


    Durvasula, Karthik and Kahng, Jimin 2016. The role of phrasal phonology in speech perception: What perceptual epenthesis shows us. Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 54, p. 15.


    Iosad, Pavel 2016. Welsh svarabhakti as stem allomorphy. Transactions of the Philological Society,


    Lahrouchi, Mohamed and Ridouane, Rachid 2016. On diminutives and plurals in Moroccan Arabic. Morphology, Vol. 26, Issue. 3-4, p. 453.


    Bjorndahl, Christina 2015. The Segment in Phonetics and Phonology.


    Dresher, B. Elan 2015. The motivation for contrastive feature hierarchies in phonology. Linguistic Variation, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    Kim, Namhee and Davis, Barbara L. 2015. A phonetic approach to consonant repetition in early words. Infant Behavior and Development, Vol. 40, p. 193.


    Nevins, Andrew 2015. Triumphs and limits of the Contrastivity-Only Hypothesis. Linguistic Variation, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 41.


    Ramsammy, Michael 2015. The Life Cycle of Phonological Processes: Accounting for Dialectal Microtypologies. Language and Linguistics Compass, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 33.


    Braver, Aaron 2014. Imperceptible incomplete neutralization: Production, non-identifiability, and non-discriminability in American English flapping. Lingua, Vol. 152, p. 24.


    Domahs, Ulrike Plag, Ingo and Carroll, Rebecca 2014. Word stress assignment in German, English and Dutch: Quantity-sensitivity and extrametricality revisited. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 59.


    Newell, Heather and Piggott, Glyne 2014. Interactions at the syntax–phonology interface: Evidence from Ojibwe. Lingua, Vol. 150, p. 332.


    Song, Chenqing 2014. Stop codas in Old Chinese and Proto Sino-Tibetan: A lexical diffusion analysis. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 96.


    Temple, Rosalind 2014. Advances in Sociophonetics.


    Butt, Miriam and Lahiri, Aditi 2013. Diachronic pertinacity of light verbs. Lingua, Vol. 135, p. 7.


    Caballero, Gabriela and Inkelas, Sharon 2013. Word construction: tracing an optimal path through the lexicon. Morphology, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 103.


    Celata, Chiara Calamai, Silvia Ricci, Irene and Bertini, Chiara 2013. Nasal place assimilation between phonetics and phonology: An EPG study of Italian nasal-to-velar clusters. Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 88.


    Coetzee, Andries W. and Kawahara, Shigeto 2013. Frequency biases in phonological variation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Vol. 31, Issue. 1, p. 47.


    Sechang Lee, 2013. Voice Assimilation in English. Korean Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 38, Issue. 3, p. 751.


    Recasens, Daniel and Mira, Meritxell 2012. Voicing assimilation in Catalan two-consonant clusters. Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 40, Issue. 5, p. 639.


    ×

Some consequences of Lexical Phonology*

  • Paul Kiparsky (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000397
  • Published online: 20 October 2008
Abstract

Phonological theory in recent years can be said to have undergone a ‘modularisation’ in several respects. The formal theory is no longer expected to explain everything about phonology by itself: generalisations about phonological change which previously were used to motivate constraints on abstractness or opacity have turned out to make more sense as effects of real-time language acquisition and use. Secondly, phonological representations have become multi-tiered arrays, and much that seemed problematic about the application of rules has resolved itself in terms of properties of these arrays. Lastly, phonology itself is seen as applying both within the lexicon to the output of each morphological process, and to the output of the syntsactic component. The lexicon, moreover, may itself be organised into a hierarchy of levels, each constituting a quasi-autonomous morphological and phonological domain. In this paper I propose to investigate some consequences of this third kind of modularisation, the approach which has come to be known as LEXICAL PHONOLOGY.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Herbert Coats & Harshenin A. (1971). On the phonological properties of Russian v. Slavic and East European Journal 15. 466478.

Morris Halle & Vergnaud J.-R. (1981). Harmony processes. In W. Klein & W. Levelt (eds.) Crossing the boundaries in linguistics. Dordrecht: Reidel. 122.

Roman Jakobson (1948). Russian conjugation. Word 4. 155167.

Roman Jakobson (1978). Mutual assimilation of Russian voiced and voiceless consonants. Studia Linguistica 32. 107110.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Phonology
  • ISSN: 0952-6757
  • EISSN: 1469-8188
  • URL: /core/journals/phonology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×