Hostname: page-component-7dc689bd49-rf6jd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-20T10:08:45.363Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Representation of Women in the Parliament of the Weimar Republic: Evidence from Roll Call Votes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2014

Marc Debus
University of Mannheim
Martin Ejnar Hansen
Brunel University


In modern democracies, the representation of voter interests and preferences is primarily the job of political parties and their elected officials. These patterns can, however, change when the issues that are at stake concern the interests of social groups represented by all relevant parties of a political system. In this article we focus on the behavior of female MPs in the parliament of Weimar Germany and, thus, on a parliament where legislative party discipline was very high. On the basis of a dataset containing information on the legislative voting behavior of MPs, we show that gender, even when controlling for a battery of further theoretically derived explanatory factors, had a decisive impact on the MPs' voting behavior on a law proposal to curb the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.

Research Article
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Aleman, Eduardo, and Saiegh, Sebastian. 2012. “Political Realignment and Democratic Breakdown in Argentina, 1916–1930.” Party Politics, doi:10.1177/1354068812458613.Google Scholar
Bäck, Hanna, Debus, Marc, and Müller, Jochen. 2014. “Who Takes the Parliamentary Floor? The Role of Gender in Speech-making in the Swedish RiksdagPolitical Research Quarterly, doi:10.1177/1065912914525861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, Markus, Debus, Marc, and Müller, Jochen. 2013. “Beyond Party Unity: An Analysis of Legislative Behavior in Moral Policy Making.” Presented at the 41st ECPR Joint Sessions, Mainz.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2007. “Numbers and Newness: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 2749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 1997. “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic.” World Politics 49 (3): 401–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun. 2010. “Private Members' Bills in the UK Parliament. Is There an ‘Electoral Connection’?Journal of Legislative Studies 16 (4): 476–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bräuninger, Thomas, Brunner, Martin, and Däubler, Thomas. 2012. “Personal Vote-Seeking in Flexible List Systems. How Electoral Incentives Shape Belgian MPs' Bill Initiation Behaviour.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (5): 607–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2007. Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote. A Rank-Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly, and Langbein, Laura. 2009. “Linking Women's Descriptive and Substantive Representation in the United States.” Politics & Gender 5 (4): 491518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drude, Dahlerup, ed. 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Debus, Marc, and Hansen, Martin Ejnar. 2010. “Die Dimensionalität der Reichstage der Weimarer Republik von 1920 bis 1932.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 51 (1): 1542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Regine. 1920. Die Politische Tat der Frau aus der Nationalversammlung. Gotha: Verlag Friedrich Andreas Perthes.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Regine. 1923. Zwei Jahre parlamentarischer Frauenarbeit Aus dem ersten Reichstag der deutschen Republik. Gotha: Verlag Friedrich Andreas Perthes.Google Scholar
Diaz, Mercedes Mateo. 2005. Representing Women? Female Legislators in West European Parliaments. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Eifert, Christiane. 1997. “Coming to Terms with the State: Maternalist Politics and the Development of the Welfare State in Weimar Germany.” Central European History 30 (1): 2547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eley, Geoff, and Grossmann, Atina. 1997. “Maternalism and Citizenship in Weimar Germany: The Gendered Politics of Welfare.” Central European History 30 (1): 6788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellenbrand, Petra. 1999. Die Volksbewegung und Volksaufklärung gegen Geschlechtskrankheiten in Kaiserreich und Weimarer Republik. Marburg: Görich & Weiershäuser.Google Scholar
Evans, Richard J. 1976. The Feminist Movement in Germany 1894–1933. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Falter, Jürgen. 1991. Hitlers Wähler. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Falter, Jürgen W., and Hänisch, Dirk. 1990. Election and Social Data of the Districts and Municipalities of the German Empire from 1920 to 1933. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA8013 data file version 1.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.8013.Google Scholar
Hansen, Martin Ejnar, and Debus, Marc. 2012. “The Behaviour of Political Parties and MPs in the Parliaments of the Weimar Republic.” Party Politics 18 (5): 709–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Elizabeth. 1995. “The Failure of Feminism? Young Women and the Bourgeois Movement in Weimar Germany 1918–1933.” Central European History 28 (1): 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Elizabeth. 2000. “Pilgrimages to the ‘Bleeding Border’: Gender and Rituals of Nationalist Protest in Germany, 1919–1939.” Women's History Review 9 (2): 201 –29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Elizabeth. 2004. “Visions of the Volk: German Women and the Far Right from Kaiserreich to Third Reich.” Journal of Women's History 16 (3): 152–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Roseanne M., Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle. 2005. “Women on the Sidelines: Women's Representation on Committees in Latin American Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 420–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul, and Roland, Gérard. 2006. “Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 494511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, Simon, and Martin, Danielle. 2012. “How Electoral Systems Affect MPs Positions. Electoral Studies 31 (1): 192200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments. Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Koonz, Claudia. 1976. “Conflicting Allegiances: Political Ideology and Women Legislators in Weimar Germany.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 1 (3): 663–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1996. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Sibylle H. 2010. “Chaotic Shop-Talk or Efficient Parliament? The Reichstag, the Parties, and the Problem of Governmental Instability in the Weimar Republic.” Public Choice 144 (1–2): 83104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepsius, M. Rainer. 1993. “Parteiensystem und Sozialstruktur: Zum Problem der Demokratisierung der deutschen Gesellschaft.” In Demokratie in Deutschland, ed. Lepsius, M. Rainer. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liepach, Martin. 1996. Das Wahlverhalten der jüdischen Bevölkerung: Zur politischen Orientierung der Juden in der Weimarer Republik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M., and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, ed. Lipset, Seymour M. and Rokkan, Stein. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Lösche, Peter. 1994. Kleine Geschichte der deutschen Parteien. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. “Westminster Women: The Politics of Presence.” Political Studies 51 (1): 84102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Jason A., and O'Brien, Erin E.. 2011. “Quasi-Experimental Design, Constituency, and Advancing Women's Interest: Reexamining the Influence of Gender on Substantive Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 472–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markmann, Heinz. 1955. Das Abstimmungsverhalten der Parteifraktionen in deutschen Parlamenten. Meisenheim: Verlag A. Hain.Google Scholar
Mergel, Thomas. 2005. Parlamentarische Kultur in der Weimarer Republik. Politische Kommunikation, symbolische Politik und Öffentlichkeit im Reichstag. Düsseldorf: Droste.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peukert, Detlev. 1987. Die Weimarer Republik: Krisenjahre der Klassischen Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Philips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: a Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pore, Renate. 1981. A Conflict of Interest: Women in German Social Democracy, 1919–1933. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2004. “Political Representation in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 273–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyta, Wolfgang. 1997. “Politische Kultur und Wahlen in der Weimarer Republik.” In Wahlen und Wahlkämpfe in Deutschland. Von den Anfängen im 19. Jahrhundert bis zur Bundesrepublik Deutschland, ed. Ritter, Gerhard A.. Düsseldorf: Droste.Google Scholar
Rice, Stuart A. 1925. “The Behavior of Legislative Groups: A Method of Measurement.” Political Science Quarterly 40 (1): 6072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saalfeld, Thomas. 1995. “On Dogs and Whips: Recorded Votes.” In Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, ed. Döring, Herbert. Frankfurt, NY: Camps and St. Martin's Press, 528–65.Google Scholar
Saalfeld, Thomas. 2011. “Parliamentary Questions as Instruments of Substantive Representation: Visible Minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005–2010.” Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3): 271289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2003. “Ideology, Party and Interests in the British Parliament of 1841–1847.” British Journal of Political Science 33 (4): 581605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schüler, Anja. 2008. Bubikopf und kurze Röcke. (May 26, 2014).Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Mishler, William. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women's Representation.” Journal of Politics 67 (2): 407–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, Donald D. 1994. Westminster's World. Understanding Political Roles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S., Valdini, Melody E., and Suominen, Kati. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 437–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieberer, Ulrich. 2010. “Behavioral Consequences of Mixed Electoral Systems. Deviating Voting Behavior of District and List MPs in the German Bundestag.” Electoral Studies 29 (3): 484–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmaier, Mary, Tosun, Jale, and Vlachová, Klára. 2014. “Women's Parliamentary Representation in the Czech Republic: Does Preference Voting Matter?East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 28 (1): 187204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, Kaare, and Müller, Wolfgang C.. 1999. “Political Parties and Hard Choices.” In Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, ed. Strøm, Kaare and Müller, Wolfgang C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wängnerud, Lena. 2009. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 5169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willing, Matthias. 2005. “Frauenbewegung und Bewahrungsgesetz: Weibliche Initiativen zur Zwangsbewahrung ‘Asozialer’ in der Weimarer Republik.” In Politische Kulturgeschichte der Zwischenkriegszeit 1918–1939, ed. Hardtwig, Wolfgang. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 279306.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar