Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Mind the Gender Gap: An Experiment on the Influence of Self-Efficacy on Political Interest

  • Jessica Robinson Preece (a1)

In a healthy democracy, one would expect to see roughly equal levels of political participation among men and women. Yet—aside from voting—women are significantly less politically engaged than men at both the mass and elite levels (Atkeson 2003; Bennett and Bennett 1989; Burns, Schlozman, and Verba 2001; Lawless and Fox 2010; Verba, Burns, and Schlozman 1997). The political engagement gender gap suggests that some form of “adverse selection” is at play in the system (Mansbridge 1999, 632). This takes many forms: women have traditionally had less access to resources, more burdensome family obligations, and fewer relevant role models. However, emerging research demonstrates that even when accounting for many of these factors, women remain less engaged with politics than similarly situated men. This suggests that changing these structural factors is not enough to close the gender gap in political engagement—we must address the “gendered psyche” that prevents many women from fully participating in civic life (Lawless and Fox 2010, 12).

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Lonna Rae Atkeson . 2003. “Not All Cues Are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement.” The Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1041–61.

Lonna Rae Atekson , and Ronald B. Rapoport . 2003. “The More Things Change the More They Stay the Same: Examining Gender Differences in Political Attitude Expression, 1952–2000.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67 (4): 495521.

Albert Bandura . 1982. “Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency.” American Psychologist 37 (2): 122–47.

Linda L. M. Bennett , and Stephen Earl Bennett . 1989. “Enduring Gender Differences in Political Interest: The Impact of Socialization and Political Dispositions.” American Politics Research 17 (1): 105–22.

Sylvia Beyer . 1990. “Gendered Differences in the Accuracy of Self-Evaluations of Performance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (5): 960–70.

Sylvia Beyer , and Edward M. Bowden . 1997. “Gender Differences in Self-Perceptions: Convergent Evidence from Three Measures of Accuracy and Bias.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23 (2):157–72.

Barbara J. Burt-Way , and Rita Mae Kelly . 1992. “Gender and Sustaining Political Ambition: A Study of Arizona Elected Officials.” Political Research Quarterly 45 (1): 1125.

Wayne H. Bylsma , and Brenda Major . 1992. “Two Routes to Eliminating Gender Differences in Personal Entitlement: Social Comparisons and Performance Evaluations.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 16 (2): 193200.

David E. Campbell , and Christina Wolbrecht . 2006. “See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents.” The Journal of Politics 68 (2): 233–47.

Stephen C. Craig , Richard Niemi , and Glenn E. Silver . 1990. “Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items.” Political Behavior 12 (3): 289314.

Leanne Doherty . 2011. “Filling the Female Political Pipeline: Assessing a Mentor-Based Internship Program.” Journal of Political Science Education 7 (1): 3447.

Kathleen Dolan . 2011. “Do Women and Men Know Different Things? Measuring Gender Differences in Political Knowledge.” The Journal of Politics 73 (1): 97107.

Jay K. Dow 2009. “Gender Differences in Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Characteristics-Based and Returns-Based Differences.” Political Behavior 31 (1): 117–36.

Richard L. Fox , and Jennifer L. Lawless . 2010. “If Only They'd Ask: Gender, Recruitment, and Political Ambition.” The Journal of Politics 72 (2): 310–26.

Richard L. Fox , and Jennifer L. Lawless . 2011. “Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women's Equality in Electoral Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 5973.

Jill S. Greenlee , Mirya R. Holman , and Rachel VanSickle-Ward . 2014. “Making It Personal: Assessing the Impact of In-Class Exercises on Closing the Gender Gap in Political Ambition.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (1): 4861.

Kristin Kanthak , and Jonathan Woon . 2015. “Women Don't Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 595612.

Jeffrey A. Karp , and Susan A. Banducci . 2008. “When Politics Is Not Just a Man's Game: Women's Representation and Political Engagement.” Electoral Studies 27 (10): 105–15.

Christopher F. Karpowitz , and Tali Mendelberg . 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Jennifer L. Lawless , and Richard L. Fox . 2010. It Still Takes A Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jane Mansbridge . 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.

Matthew McGlone , Joshua Aronson , and Diane Kobrynowicz . 2006. “Stereotype Threat and the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 30 (4): 392–98.

Jeffery J. Mondak , and Mary R. Anderson . 2004. “The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge.” The Journal of Politics 66 (2): 492512.

Michael E. Morrell 2003. “Survey and Experimental Evidence for a Reliable and Valid Measure of Internal Political Efficacy.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67 (4): 589602.

Heather L. Ondercin , James C. Garand , and Lauren E. Crapanzano . 2011. “Political Learning during the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election: The Impact of the Campaign on the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Electoral Studies 30 (4): 727–37.

Frank Pajares . 2002. “Gender and Perceived Self-Efficacy in Self-Regulated Learning.” Theory into Practice 41 (2): 117–25.

K. V. Petrides , and Adrian Furnham . 2000. “Gender Differences in Measured and Self-Estimated Trait Emotional Intelligence.” Sex Roles 42 (5–6): 449–61.

Desdamona Rios , Abigail J. Stewart , and David G. Winter . 2010. “‘Thinking She Could Be the Next President’: Why Identifying with the Curriculum Matters.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 34 (3): 328–38.

Tomi-Ann Roberts , and Susan Nolen-Hoeksema . 1994. “Gender Comparisons in Responsiveness to Others’ Evaluations in Achievement Settings.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 18 (2): 221–40.

Virginia Sapiro . “Private Costs of Public Commitments or Public Costs of Private Commitments? Family Roles versus Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (2): 265–79.

Kay Lehman Schlozman , Nancy Burns , and Sidney Verba . 1994. “Gender and the Pathways to Participation: The Role of Resources.” The Journal of Politics 56 (4): 963–90.

Sidney Verba , Nancy Burns , and Kay Lehman Schlozman . 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” The Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1051–72.

Kristen C. Kling , Janet Shibley Hyde , Carolin J. Showers , and Brenda N. Buswell . 1999. Gender Differences in Self-Esteem: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin 125 (4): 470.

Jessica Preece , and Olga Stoddard . 2015. “‘Why Women Don't Run: Experimental Evidence on Gender Differences in Political Competition Aversion.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 117: 296308.

Rachel Silbermann . 2015. “Gender Roles, Work-Life Balance, and Running for Office.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10 (2): 123–53.

Jennifer Wolak , and Michael McDevitt . 2010. “The Roots of the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge in Adolescence.” Political Behavior 33 (3): 505–33.

Christina Wolbrecht , and David E. Campbell . 2007. “Leading by Example: Female Members of Parliament as Political Role Models.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 921–39.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Preece supplementary material
Preece supplementary material 1

 PDF (51 KB)
51 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 16
Total number of PDF views: 129 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 587 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.